Misskittycat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-14-10 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
| 38. I'm confused. Where in this article is there a reference to someone named Schoen? |
| -Aides: Obama to prove he's a different kind of Democrat |
somone |
Nov-13-10 11:20 PM |
#0 |
 -
Dupe. Here: |
Poll_Blind |
Nov-13-10 11:21 PM |
#1 |
| -
they figured this out only in the last two weeks |
Skittles |
Nov-13-10 11:21 PM |
#2 |
  -
Don't you mean... |
lame54 |
Nov-13-10 11:36 PM |
#3 |
| -
they didn't listen to their base until after they got "shellacked" |
Skittles |
Nov-13-10 11:53 PM |
#10 |
| -
they're still not |
ibegurpard |
Nov-13-10 11:58 PM |
#13 |
| -
yup |
Skittles |
Nov-14-10 12:02 AM |
#15 |
| -
doing the same thing over and over....... |
xxqqqzme |
Nov-14-10 12:07 AM |
#20 |
| -
yep - "a different kind of Democrat" -- otherwise known as a REPUBLICAN, dammit. |
kath |
Nov-14-10 02:03 AM |
#36 |
| -
In other words...triangulation... |
nadinbrzezinski |
Nov-13-10 11:41 PM |
#4 |
| -
Rahm probably did all the pissing but with the wind. |
LiberalFighter |
Nov-13-10 11:43 PM |
#5 |
| -
Indeed. When is he going to decide to win his own base? We need a Democrat! |
ThomCat |
Nov-14-10 06:33 AM |
#44 |
| -
He's already proved it to anyone paying attention |
ibegurpard |
Nov-13-10 11:44 PM |
#6 |
| -
Too little too late. He's already passed a massive amount of the RW agenda. |
Edweird |
Nov-13-10 11:45 PM |
#7 |
| -
The people pushing the change--The Ruling Class believe |
OHdem10 |
Nov-13-10 11:57 PM |
#11 |
| -
This. |
Poll_Blind |
Nov-13-10 11:59 PM |
#14 |
| -
I don't believe that this is anything more than a marketing ploy. |
Edweird |
Nov-14-10 01:58 AM |
#34 |
| -
Can you elaborate? |
Poll_Blind |
Nov-14-10 02:03 AM |
#37 |
| -
What (of what he's signed so far) was part of this so-called "RW agenda"? |
Proud Liberal Dem |
Nov-14-10 12:10 AM |
#22 |
| -
Privatization, union busting, the individual mandate, attacking social security, |
Edweird |
Nov-14-10 02:03 AM |
#35 |
| -
Links? |
Proud Liberal Dem |
Nov-14-10 09:04 AM |
#50 |
| -
Trying to reinstate DADT and keeping troops in Iraq and Afghanistan both leap to mind. |
Donald Ian Rankin |
Nov-14-10 07:03 AM |
#47 |
| -
Disagree |
Proud Liberal Dem |
Nov-14-10 09:15 AM |
#51 |
| -
Notice they say nothing about meeting the expectations |
adnelson60087 |
Nov-13-10 11:51 PM |
#8 |
| -
Oh, they GET it. But the DC Dems exist solely to suppress their base. |
Jim Sagle |
Nov-14-10 01:40 AM |
#30 |
| -
Of course not. The only people who never count are the Dem Base. |
ThomCat |
Nov-14-10 06:35 AM |
#45 |
| -
YeP. Different Democrat = DINO |
aquart |
Nov-13-10 11:53 PM |
#9 |
| -
So he will tilt at the same windmills he has been for the last two years? |
iris27 |
Nov-13-10 11:57 PM |
#12 |
| -
sounds like he just does NOT.FUCKING.GET.IT. |
Skittles |
Nov-14-10 12:02 AM |
#16 |
| -
I think he gets it |
ibegurpard |
Nov-14-10 12:09 AM |
#21 |
| -
it's very hard to think otherwise |
Skittles |
Nov-14-10 12:11 AM |
#23 |
| -
"they think he must forge partnerships with Republicans" |
Amonester |
Nov-14-10 12:02 AM |
#17 |
| -
What different? We already had bill Clinton. Nt |
xchrom |
Nov-14-10 12:05 AM |
#18 |
| -
I'm already convinced |
MannyGoldstein |
Nov-14-10 12:07 AM |
#19 |
| -
Did you read the article at WAPO? The election was a |
OHdem10 |
Nov-14-10 12:13 AM |
#24 |
| -
It flies in the face of the evidence, *but* it's a nice prelude to supporting Social Security cuts. |
Marr |
Nov-14-10 12:13 AM |
#25 |
| -
This article is nonsense double-talk. It jumps all over the place |
Misskittycat |
Nov-14-10 12:20 AM |
#26 |
| -
Schoen annoys the heck out of me, but. He would never write |
OHdem10 |
Nov-14-10 12:30 AM |
#28 |
| -
I'm confused. Where in this article is there a reference to someone named Schoen? |
Misskittycat |
Nov-14-10 02:13 AM |
#38 |
| -
"Forge partnerships with Republicans". |
pa28 |
Nov-14-10 12:26 AM |
#27 |
| -
Has the shellacking dried yet? He'd better listening to those who elected him... |
Historic NY |
Nov-14-10 01:40 AM |
#29 |
| -
Sounds like a good plan to get "shellacked" again in 2012. No thank you. |
leveymg |
Nov-14-10 01:42 AM |
#31 |
| -
Let me save them the "months" they're claiming it'll take. Whatever the problem, he'll move right. |
Warren DeMontague |
Nov-14-10 01:47 AM |
#32 |
| -
Yup. I do believe you are right. |
ThomCat |
Nov-14-10 06:38 AM |
#46 |
| -
How about trying to win back your base first, then try to get the independents? Forget the repugs - |
jillan |
Nov-14-10 01:53 AM |
#33 |
| -
Not sure why anyone thought that anything other than this was going to happen after the election. |
BzaDem |
Nov-14-10 02:17 AM |
#39 |
| -
Exactly. n/t |
JTFrog |
Nov-14-10 04:48 AM |
#43 |
| -
If Democrats had won, the same people would now be proclaiming |
Marr |
Nov-14-10 10:24 AM |
#56 |
| -
So two MORE years of the same as the last |
Raine |
Nov-14-10 02:18 AM |
#40 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-14-10 04:14 AM |
#41 |
| -
I believe he has already proven that |
Skittles |
Nov-14-10 04:36 AM |
#42 |
| -
It gets harder . . . and harder . . . . and harder . . . . |
Stinky The Clown |
Nov-14-10 07:04 AM |
#48 |
| -
I'd like to hear just exaclty how they intend to 'forge' patnerships |
Bluenorthwest |
Nov-14-10 07:42 AM |
#49 |
| -
... |
woo me with science |
Nov-14-10 09:50 AM |
#52 |
| -
He will lose '12 in this approach, but I don't think he cares a bit about that. |
stillwaiting |
Nov-14-10 09:53 AM |
#53 |
| -
P.S. He's ALREADY established very well that he's a "different" kind of Democrat. |
stillwaiting |
Nov-14-10 09:56 AM |
#54 |
| -
Yeah, the different kind of Dem he's talking about is called a "Republican"!!! |
grahamhgreen |
Nov-14-10 09:58 AM |
#55 |
| -
+1 nt |
TBF |
Nov-14-10 11:15 AM |
#59 |
| -
The Washington Post doing it's best to wimpify Obama as much as possible |
lunatica |
Nov-14-10 10:33 AM |
#57 |
| -
Trojan Horse presidency. -nt |
Poboy |
Nov-14-10 11:12 AM |
#58 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread