You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: Your response shows you haven't read my post at all... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
DutchLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-13-10 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Your response shows you haven't read my post at all...
I know the title of my thread had the form of a question, but that doesn't mean you don't have to read the post before answering. I specifically addressed your point and explained why I don't think it's true. I'll repeat it here for you:

It seems the main offense Stewart supposedly has committed, is falsely equating the 'liberal' media (or the liberal elements in the corporate media) to the right-wing, conservative (batshit) media. I also believe this was Maddow's criticism. However, as Stewart tried to point out numerous times during the interview, that was not his intention. People may have perceived it that way, but he has no control over that perception. Leftists and liberals have been mad, because it seemed like Stewart equated conspiracy theories about Obama ("the socialist muslim from Kenya") with legitimate anger from the left toward the Bush cabal (e.g. Code Pink). Stewart said to Maddow that he wasn't going at substance, but at tone. <...>

Important detail is that Stewart said to Maddow: "you know we, on the show, have a special place in our hearts for Fox". Meaning that he doesn't really think Fox and MSNBC are equals, and that Fox is a category all by it itself. At one point during the interview, he said to Maddow that she was defending herself about something he didn't accuse her of. He even complimented her and, in a way, Keith Olbermann too, by pointing out how he had been the pioneer for liberal voices on television. So this is why I don't get some poster's comment that Stewart has been working against liberal voices on television, going even as far to cite 'Crossfire' as a show for liberals. Stewart's little crusade is directed against bad media, and I thought most on DU agreed that constitutes almost all mainstream media.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC