ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-11-10 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 7. " I still don't see the issue." |
|
Issue: 56 blue dogs.
A few of them voted against unemployment benefits.
|
| -Someone tell me why Obama can't just propose the middle class cuts in the lame duck House session, |
coti |
Nov-11-10 01:32 AM |
#0 |
 -
The |
ProSense |
Nov-11-10 01:35 AM |
#1 |
  -
Pass the permanent middle class cuts through the House and let him argue with the middle class. |
coti |
Nov-11-10 01:38 AM |
#4 |
| -
" I still don't see the issue." |
ProSense |
Nov-11-10 01:44 AM |
#7 |
| -
You were talking about the Senate, first. Now it's the House? |
coti |
Nov-11-10 01:47 AM |
#11 |
| -
"Pass the permanent middle class cuts through the House" |
ProSense |
Nov-11-10 01:53 AM |
#16 |
| -
The Senate wasn't an issue. You're just throwing crap at the wall and hoping it sticks. nt |
coti |
Nov-11-10 01:55 AM |
#17 |
| -
wow, as usual, the excuse that "well, it will never pass so let's not even try" |
ima_sinnic |
Nov-11-10 04:43 AM |
#40 |
| -
because Republicans would offer amendments |
hfojvt |
Nov-11-10 01:37 AM |
#2 |
| -
We don't know that.. |
Hardrada |
Nov-11-10 01:39 AM |
#5 |
| -
There's something wrong with this reasoning. If it was valid, nothing would ever |
coti |
Nov-11-10 01:42 AM |
#6 |
| -
Guess what? Reid managed to keep amendments out of the final fix to the health care bill that was... |
laughingliberal |
Nov-11-10 01:58 AM |
#19 |
| -
shhhhhh. |
Hannah Bell |
Nov-11-10 01:37 AM |
#3 |
| -
Because he is a corporatist wuss? |
Hawkowl |
Nov-11-10 01:44 AM |
#8 |
| -
+1 |
grahamhgreen |
Nov-11-10 01:51 AM |
#13 |
| -
+2 |
Hoopla Phil |
Nov-11-10 02:14 AM |
#26 |
| -
bingo (n/t) |
ima_sinnic |
Nov-11-10 01:59 PM |
#46 |
| -
They may. But I wouldn't count on the Repubs not filibustering. |
TheWraith |
Nov-11-10 01:45 AM |
#9 |
| -
Because, ultimately, he doesn't want to |
demwing |
Nov-11-10 01:47 AM |
#10 |
| -
Because he is not a member of Congress. |
Ozymanithrax |
Nov-11-10 01:50 AM |
#12 |
| -
Nope. That whole tax cut was passed under reconciliation. No reason the middle class tax cut... |
laughingliberal |
Nov-11-10 01:51 AM |
#14 |
| -
He would have a Representative propose it for him and there is no way in HELL |
coti |
Nov-11-10 01:53 AM |
#15 |
| -
Really? |
ProSense |
Nov-11-10 01:55 AM |
#18 |
| -
Tax cuts for the middle class? TAX CUTS?? |
coti |
Nov-11-10 02:04 AM |
#20 |
| -
Tax cuts and Republicans will filibuster it |
ProSense |
Nov-11-10 02:07 AM |
#21 |
| -
Fine, let 'em do it and we'll KILL them in 2012! |
coti |
Nov-11-10 02:09 AM |
#22 |
| -
Did you know they're |
ProSense |
Nov-11-10 02:13 AM |
#25 |
| -
Most of them would lose their jobs, and they'd know it. |
coti |
Nov-11-10 02:15 AM |
#27 |
| -
Let me see if I understand your argument: |
ProSense |
Nov-11-10 02:18 AM |
#29 |
| -
??? Get some sleep. |
coti |
Nov-11-10 02:21 AM |
#31 |
| -
You were better off arguing about the House. nt |
coti |
Nov-11-10 02:16 AM |
#28 |
| -
Sorry, I disagree. |
Ozymanithrax |
Nov-11-10 02:10 AM |
#23 |
| -
Not even people as stupid as teabaggers would buy that. |
coti |
Nov-11-10 02:11 AM |
#24 |
| -
They have bought every Republican filibuster. |
Ozymanithrax |
Nov-11-10 02:18 AM |
#30 |
| -
They're awfully gullible, but the Republicans don't believe enough in their gullibility on |
coti |
Nov-11-10 02:22 AM |
#32 |
| -
The tax cut that's expiring was passed under reconciliation. I don't see why an middle class cut... |
laughingliberal |
Nov-11-10 02:33 AM |
#34 |
| -
Here is the process... |
Ozymanithrax |
Nov-11-10 11:06 AM |
#43 |
| -
+1 OP just assumes that the President is in charge of what goes |
treestar |
Nov-11-10 11:08 AM |
#44 |
| -
it's like when they post a list of congressional accomplishments and try and give the pres credit.. |
frylock |
Nov-11-10 12:55 PM |
#45 |
| -
Because every time Democrats behave like they have a pair |
Warren DeMontague |
Nov-11-10 02:33 AM |
#33 |
| -
Too many Dems in the current Senate would not vote for it because |
DeltaLitProf |
Nov-11-10 02:34 AM |
#35 |
| -
Wouldn't even have to pass the lame duck Senate, it could carry over |
coti |
Nov-11-10 02:36 AM |
#36 |
| -
It can't. All legislation has to start anew in each new Congress. |
DeltaLitProf |
Nov-11-10 02:38 AM |
#37 |
| -
Why would the lame duck Senate be okay with passing both the middle class and high end cuts, but |
coti |
Nov-11-10 02:38 AM |
#38 |
| -
Yes, isn't it crucial that they try to do it? and if necessary isolate recalcitrant Dems? |
anAustralianobserver |
Nov-11-10 04:01 AM |
#39 |
| -
outgoing house members are playing to their next lucratic gig, not to the voters. |
unblock |
Nov-11-10 06:37 AM |
#41 |
| -
Well . . . isn't it obvious? |
Vinca |
Nov-11-10 06:39 AM |
#42 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread