You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #74: Why thank you. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-10 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #68
74. Why thank you.
Back at ya! :hug:

I should reference here this recent DU thread, which perhaps gives an answer to my question.

Strange times, innit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Obama admin. cutting gay soldiers pay in half once discharged, when they don't have to Bluebear  Nov-10-10 11:40 PM   #0 
  - ....so tiring to keep up with all the hope.  Hannah Bell   Nov-10-10 11:42 PM   #1 
  - god--well said. extremely well said. exactly how i've felt. n/t  orleans   Nov-12-10 01:23 AM   #70 
  - I'm not familiar with the referenced site, but it's possible that you all are being gamed.  MrsCorleone   Nov-12-10 02:38 AM   #76 
     - Oh, for crying out loud! Here, from the ACLU website:  laughingliberal   Nov-12-10 02:44 AM   #77 
        - Hey, don't get me wrong. This is one of the most onerous parts of this ridiculous & discriminatory  MrsCorleone   Nov-12-10 03:25 AM   #79 
  - Speechless. n/t  TriMera   Nov-10-10 11:48 PM   #2 
  - HOPETASTIC! n/t  QC   Nov-10-10 11:49 PM   #3 
  - What a shocker!  Behind the Aegis   Nov-10-10 11:50 PM   #4 
  - You're an optimist.  Starry Messenger   Nov-10-10 11:53 PM   #6 
  - Butt, butt, something must be done to combat affirmative action.  TheMadMonk   Nov-11-10 12:08 AM   #11 
  - You are such an optimist. n/t  Jamastiene   Nov-11-10 12:10 AM   #13 
  - They all KNOW it's discriminatory.  donco6   Nov-11-10 06:21 AM   #24 
  - This is an outrage, and heads should roll over it.  TexasObserver   Nov-10-10 11:53 PM   #5 
  - If I'm reading this correctly, it was implemented in 1991. Whose heads should roll? nt  gateley   Nov-10-10 11:56 PM   #8 
     - Everyone associated with the decision and enforcement.  TexasObserver   Nov-11-10 12:05 AM   #10 
     - Hush, with your inconvenient "facts" and "knowledge."  TheWraith   Nov-11-10 01:40 AM   #15 
     - What "facts" or "knowledge" did 'gateley' introduce?  Behind the Aegis   Nov-11-10 03:28 AM   #19 
     - :crickets:  Bluebear   Nov-11-10 05:36 AM   #22 
     - Could we have some coyotes, too? And maybe a tumbleweed? n/t  QC   Nov-11-10 09:05 AM   #42 
     - Oh, was there a timeline in which I was supposed to answer? Damn, I guess  gateley   Nov-11-10 02:06 PM   #52 
        - You "fuck it", QC's question here was not directed at you.  Bluebear   Nov-11-10 02:08 PM   #54 
           - Okay. Done. nt  gateley   Nov-11-10 02:17 PM   #57 
     - Aravosis blamed it on Obama, trying to cover the fact that it's been the case since 1991.  TheWraith   Nov-11-10 12:58 PM   #47 
     - So, the answer to my question is "no."  Behind the Aegis   Nov-11-10 11:47 PM   #63 
     - Suppose I have a corporate fraud case.  Occulus   Nov-12-10 02:21 AM   #75 
     - Here you go:  laughingliberal   Nov-12-10 02:50 AM   #78 
     - No, people are misunderstanding my point and I obviously didn't make that  gateley   Nov-11-10 01:29 PM   #49 
        - You should read more closely.  Behind the Aegis   Nov-11-10 11:44 PM   #62 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-11-10 06:27 AM   #26 
     - Did he know about it going in? When did he become aware of it? I'm guessing there's  gateley   Nov-11-10 01:55 PM   #50 
     - Ain't in the truth  HughMoran   Nov-11-10 08:48 AM   #34 
     - GOOD RIDDANCE  Bluebear   Nov-11-10 07:24 PM   #59 
     - +1000 n/t  Tx4obama   Nov-12-10 12:19 AM   #65 
     - The ones keeping the policy in place, of course.  Occulus   Nov-11-10 01:44 AM   #16 
        - Why all of a sudden now? It's been in place for over 10 years. Don't you find  gateley   Nov-11-10 02:05 AM   #17 
           - "Why all of a sudden now?"  Occulus   Nov-11-10 03:42 AM   #21 
           - Yeah, because if they didn't scream about it before, they have no right to now.  donco6   Nov-11-10 06:20 AM   #23 
              - Yes! That's EXACTLY what I meant!  gateley   Nov-11-10 07:17 AM   #28 
                 - He has been President for two years  dsc   Nov-11-10 07:26 AM   #29 
                 - He didn't put it into play, but maintaining an obviously discriminatory procedure is just as bad.  donco6   Nov-11-10 08:45 AM   #32 
                 - Agree. But do we know he's even aware of it? Or if he is that he's NOT doing  gateley   Nov-11-10 02:14 PM   #56 
                 - He's not NOT doing it = he's doing it.  piratefish08   Nov-11-10 08:49 AM   #35 
                 - "why are they making it sound as though it's Obama's doing?"  Occulus   Nov-11-10 08:49 AM   #36 
                 - I'm making it sound that way? How about the title of the thread:  gateley   Nov-11-10 01:23 PM   #48 
                 - Obama does like gays and has done quite a bit so far for the LGBT community.  Tx4obama   Nov-12-10 12:31 AM   #67 
                    - "Obama does like gays" - that's why he doesn't believe in our equality  Bluebear   Nov-12-10 01:27 AM   #71 
                 - You know why  HughMoran   Nov-11-10 08:50 AM   #37 
                 - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-11-10 08:55 AM   #38 
                 - "You people"???  SeattleGirl   Nov-11-10 11:10 AM   #46 
                 - Yep.  MrsCorleone   Nov-12-10 01:57 PM   #80 
                 - Aravosis had a choice to make.  Radical Activist   Nov-11-10 09:02 AM   #41 
                    - yeah it is his fault Obama didn't do a damn thing for two years  dsc   Nov-11-10 02:12 PM   #55 
                       - !  Bluebear   Nov-11-10 07:56 PM   #60 
                          - Hey Bluebear, have you ever noticed how,  Occulus   Nov-12-10 12:23 AM   #66 
                             - Curious, ain't it?  Bluebear   Nov-12-10 01:11 AM   #68 
                                - Why thank you.  Occulus   Nov-12-10 02:05 AM   #74 
  - Agree -- why sue Obama's administration? Why now? Why not Clinton's or Bush's? nt  gateley   Nov-10-10 11:54 PM   #7 
  - Why was the Civil Rights Act enacted in the 60s? Why not under Eisenhower? Or Polk?  Bluebear   Nov-11-10 03:39 AM   #20 
  - What's your point? That the policy should be preserved so as not to embarrass Obama?  WinkyDink   Nov-11-10 06:25 AM   #25 
  - No -- why do people think I'm trying to 'shield' Obama? The title thread subject  gateley   Nov-11-10 02:01 PM   #51 
  - Because they no longer exist  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-11-10 08:57 AM   #39 
  - Because NOW is when the practice has been revealed.  TexasObserver   Nov-11-10 11:06 AM   #44 
  - I seriously hope seperation-pay policy is ammended....  midnight   Nov-10-10 11:59 PM   #9 
  - Fierce! I tell ya! Fierce!  Jamastiene   Nov-11-10 12:09 AM   #12 
  - Unf#cking believable.  EFerrari   Nov-11-10 12:18 AM   #14 
  - Recommended.  Heidi   Nov-11-10 02:09 AM   #18 
  - There are, and have been, two tiers of separation pay -  Obamanaut   Nov-11-10 06:43 AM   #27 
  - !!!! KEY POINT !!!!!  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-11-10 08:59 AM   #40 
  - Ugly ass shit. nt  BlueIris   Nov-11-10 07:28 AM   #30 
  - But Bluebear, you keep forgetting one thing...  muffin1   Nov-11-10 07:39 AM   #31 
  - Love to you  Bluebear   Nov-11-10 04:47 PM   #58 
  - hope in one hand, change in the other -  piratefish08   Nov-11-10 08:47 AM   #33 
  - They still pay you when they discharge you?  Life Long Dem   Nov-11-10 09:31 AM   #43 
  - I Swear he acts more Repuklican by the Day  fascisthunter   Nov-11-10 11:09 AM   #45 
  - Oh nooes! You want Palin! No pony for you!  Catherina   Nov-11-10 02:06 PM   #53 
     - !  Bluebear   Nov-12-10 10:52 PM   #82 
  - K&R  amborin   Nov-11-10 08:42 PM   #61 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-12-10 12:17 AM   #64 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-12-10 01:14 AM   #69 
     - I have never used those words that you typed. n/t  Tx4obama   Nov-12-10 01:42 AM   #73 
        - Right.  Bluebear   Nov-12-10 02:13 PM   #81 
  - Sounds like a bout of 'shithead in charge' making evil decisions.  Rex   Nov-12-10 01:35 AM   #72 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC