You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #57: OK. Let us now send the REAL Carlson away into retirement. nt [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-10 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
57. OK. Let us now send the REAL Carlson away into retirement. nt
Edited on Wed Nov-10-10 01:00 PM by thereismore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -UPDATE: Tucker Carlson ADMITS he sent the fake Keith Olbermann emails Tx4obama  Nov-10-10 01:24 AM   #0 
  - Time for a suit  sakabatou   Nov-10-10 01:26 AM   #1 
  - Yes n/t  me b zola   Nov-10-10 12:13 PM   #49 
  - Yes  lsewpershad   Nov-10-10 12:31 PM   #55 
  - Need a bow tie with that suit?  Blue Owl   Nov-10-10 01:08 PM   #60 
  - Keith, call one of the "trial lawyers" that Carlson & his ilk hate.  Bluebear   Nov-10-10 01:27 AM   #2 
  - Absolutely.  de novo   Nov-10-10 12:23 PM   #53 
  - Kick nt  laughingliberal   Nov-10-10 01:33 AM   #3 
  - weak  Skittles   Nov-10-10 02:08 AM   #4 
  - Republicon propaganda pimps don't do ethics  SpiralHawk   Nov-10-10 07:45 AM   #21 
  - when pushed....they call it comedy...or satire...or some other lame alibi...when really  Supersedeas   Nov-10-10 09:12 AM   #31 
  - That is not the only place ...  butterfly77   Nov-10-10 12:06 PM   #42 
  - totally weak  proud patriot   Nov-10-10 09:27 PM   #89 
  - Not only is this a civil lawsuit it sounds criminal.  EmeraldCityGrl   Nov-10-10 02:21 AM   #5 
  - Oh Please... "CALL IN THE NATIONAL GUARD!!"  crazyjoe   Nov-10-10 12:00 PM   #40 
     - Really...there's nothing to see here  Wednesdays   Nov-10-10 12:10 PM   #47 
     - Excuse me?  me b zola   Nov-10-10 12:17 PM   #51 
     - It is a serious offense. He could have cost KO his job and totally ruined his  tblue37   Nov-10-10 02:53 PM   #70 
     - actually people get prosecuted for cyberstalking for less than this.  datasuspect   Nov-10-10 05:39 PM   #81 
     - really, give me an example of someone being prosecuted  crazyjoe   Nov-10-10 06:04 PM   #82 
        - do your own goddamned research  datasuspect   Nov-10-10 06:12 PM   #83 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-10-10 06:18 PM   #85 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-10-10 06:27 PM   #86 
        - Lori Drew.  boppers   Nov-11-10 12:25 AM   #95 
           - BWAHAHAHA!!!!  crazyjoe   Nov-11-10 06:45 AM   #99 
              - You asked for an example of prosecution for something lesser, and got one.  boppers   Nov-12-10 07:56 PM   #104 
     - libel...  awoke_in_2003   Nov-10-10 11:52 PM   #93 
        - so is robbery and insurance fraud, what's your point?  crazyjoe   Nov-11-10 06:48 AM   #100 
           - Tucker, is that you? You're the only person who would come on here and defend this shit. n/t  Exilednight   Nov-11-10 06:52 AM   #101 
           - show me where i defended tucker carlson....you can't because i didn't  crazyjoe   Nov-11-10 11:34 AM   #102 
              - Damages do not have to be shown for identity theft. All you need is proof of malice intent. n/t  Exilednight   Nov-11-10 11:40 AM   #103 
           - my point is...  awoke_in_2003   Nov-12-10 11:46 PM   #105 
  - The petard fields are ripe! Harvest time! (nt)  Posteritatis   Nov-10-10 02:32 AM   #6 
  - wtf? fire that no-talent, no-brain preppie twit.  Hannah Bell   Nov-10-10 03:31 AM   #7 
  - Only problem with that is...  polmaven   Nov-10-10 07:54 AM   #24 
     - Exactly. Faux isn't going to fire him.  Terra Alta   Nov-10-10 09:14 AM   #32 
     - yes, that *is* a problem. brownshirts running the media is a big problem.  Hannah Bell   Nov-10-10 02:16 PM   #68 
        - Personally,  polmaven   Nov-10-10 09:03 PM   #88 
  - Ouch. bowtie boy, that's gonna be expensive  tavalon   Nov-10-10 03:33 AM   #8 
  - This dude has a sick obsession with Keith  Ramulux   Nov-10-10 03:56 AM   #9 
  - Fucker Carlson once again proves he's a sleazeball.  Hissyspit   Nov-10-10 04:38 AM   #10 
  - Creepy. It was pretty bizarre for him to buy that domain name to begin with  Cass   Nov-10-10 04:45 AM   #11 
  - Do you have any idea how anyone traced the purchased to Insanity?  The Backlash Cometh   Nov-10-10 10:43 AM   #35 
  - He shouldn't have admitted.  TexasObserver   Nov-10-10 04:50 AM   #12 
  - Doubtful since he has been upfront and honest(relative word)  whistler162   Nov-10-10 07:45 AM   #20 
     - I have no doubt he can be successfully sued for misrepresenting his identity.  TexasObserver   Nov-10-10 01:00 PM   #58 
  - k + r  deacon   Nov-10-10 05:31 AM   #13 
  - Exhibit A, your honor.  tanyev   Nov-10-10 07:31 AM   #14 
  - almost as funny as that teabaggers "satire" Obama letter  lame54   Nov-10-10 07:32 AM   #15 
  - 2 highly intillegint people exchanging barbs!  whistler162   Nov-10-10 07:36 AM   #16 
  - "Carlson said he didn't expect the email exchange to be published."  blondeatlast   Nov-10-10 07:38 AM   #17 
  - Jesus, grow up Tucker  ellie   Nov-10-10 07:39 AM   #18 
  - He'll just say it was "satire" and get off the hook.  cbdo2007   Nov-10-10 07:44 AM   #19 
  - You know that pathetic has-been was PRAYING that those emails would be published.  beac   Nov-10-10 07:48 AM   #22 
  - Carlson is typical of born-rich conservatives.  Jim__   Nov-10-10 07:51 AM   #23 
  - Stupid motherfucker.  Dappleganger   Nov-10-10 08:15 AM   #25 
  - How pathetic.  City Lights   Nov-10-10 08:28 AM   #26 
  - Wow, he's 41 years old  TuxedoKat   Nov-10-10 08:32 AM   #27 
  - Hey Tucker  JitterbugPerfume   Nov-10-10 08:38 AM   #28 
  - I don't suppose Griffin's going to indefinitely suspend him...  backscatter712   Nov-10-10 08:41 AM   #29 
  - K&R..nt  SidDithers   Nov-10-10 08:42 AM   #30 
  - K&R. nt  Chorophyll   Nov-10-10 09:24 AM   #33 
  - Oh, just another silly good ole boy tactic. ha-ha.  The Backlash Cometh   Nov-10-10 10:41 AM   #34 
  - Tucker should have spoken to his Attorney first.  formercia   Nov-10-10 11:25 AM   #36 
  - Weird sense of humor.  Cleita   Nov-10-10 11:37 AM   #37 
  - lets get a grip people, this is kinda funny.  crazyjoe   Nov-10-10 11:58 AM   #38 
  - "It's out there now so it really doesn't matter who said it."  sufrommich   Nov-10-10 11:59 AM   #39 
  - uhh...ok.....what?  crazyjoe   Nov-10-10 12:04 PM   #41 
     - What part of my post didn't you understand? nnt  sufrommich   Nov-10-10 12:07 PM   #43 
        - I understood none of it, maybe you could explain.  crazyjoe   Nov-10-10 12:09 PM   #46 
           - Are you OK with Tucker Carlson putting words in KOs  sufrommich   Nov-10-10 12:17 PM   #50 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-10-10 12:21 PM   #52 
  - It is kind of funny. It's also kind of fraudulent  Renew Deal   Nov-10-10 01:09 PM   #61 
  - Wow, I don't find it funny in the least. Fucker Carlson's behaviour was  arthritisR_US   Nov-10-10 02:08 PM   #67 
  - what is the problem we have with this again???  crazyjoe   Nov-10-10 12:08 PM   #44 
  - The problem, sir, is that there is no way in hell I would purport to know what is  blondeatlast   Nov-10-10 12:24 PM   #54 
  - Hint: You don't want to be too obvious  tkmorris   Nov-10-10 12:54 PM   #56 
  - He could have cost KO his job with that sort of nonsense. That is no minor thing. nt  tblue37   Nov-10-10 02:57 PM   #71 
  - Fraud.  LanternWaste   Nov-10-10 05:34 PM   #80 
     - anyone with access to a linux machine can send an email using  crazyjoe   Nov-10-10 06:13 PM   #84 
        - Linux has nothing to do with it. At all. Linux didn't exist in 1982.  boppers   Nov-11-10 12:38 AM   #98 
  - what an ass.  tigereye   Nov-10-10 12:08 PM   #45 
  - Petulant little child.  Fuzz   Nov-10-10 12:12 PM   #48 
  - No. Adult felon.  JackRiddler   Nov-10-10 01:37 PM   #65 
  - OK. Let us now send the REAL Carlson away into retirement. nt  thereismore   Nov-10-10 01:00 PM   #57 
  - A few months in prison would be better.  JackRiddler   Nov-10-10 03:11 PM   #76 
  - The mind is weak.  deutsey   Nov-10-10 01:05 PM   #59 
  - This is not a prank or a stupid act. It is crime.  JackRiddler   Nov-10-10 01:10 PM   #62 
  - That's the point some people don't understand  formercia   Nov-10-10 01:27 PM   #63 
  - Yes, once again dirty tricks of the Watergate/COINTELPRO type are trivialized as "pranks"  JackRiddler   Nov-10-10 01:36 PM   #64 
  - And the spinmasters try to shift the discourse to one of humor.  formercia   Nov-10-10 03:01 PM   #74 
  - Oh, they DO understand, but the thing is...  Commie Pinko Dirtbag   Nov-10-10 03:01 PM   #73 
  - what is the crime? civil/misdemeanor? The whole thing really  arthritisR_US   Nov-10-10 01:44 PM   #66 
     - Impersonation...  JackRiddler   Nov-10-10 03:10 PM   #75 
     - it looks like it falls just short of a federal crime because Keith isn't an  arthritisR_US   Nov-10-10 04:49 PM   #79 
     - The crime behind the "joke"  nightgaunt   Nov-10-10 11:35 PM   #92 
     - Wire fraud. (nt)  Posteritatis   Nov-10-10 07:01 PM   #87 
  - "Could you resist?" .....Um...YES!  SoCalDem   Nov-10-10 02:19 PM   #69 
  - Idiot frat boy who never grew up!  Pisces   Nov-10-10 02:57 PM   #72 
  - he forgets, there are still courts... I hope he loses several hundred grand in a suit, and I hope he  Divine Discontent   Nov-10-10 04:05 PM   #78 
  - hubris.  NoSheep   Nov-10-10 03:29 PM   #77 
  - I always expected that Tucker was an idiot  jimlup   Nov-10-10 09:31 PM   #90 
  - I wonder what Jon Stewart will have to say!  Blacksheep214   Nov-10-10 09:52 PM   #91 
  - Tells you a lot about his character that he doesn't think it was wrong.  Jakes Progress   Nov-11-10 12:06 AM   #94 
  - I'm not surprised that he wrote them, but I thought he'd blame it on someone else. What a weasel. nt  Liquorice   Nov-11-10 12:27 AM   #96 
  - Nothing will happen except that he'll get a promotion and maybe a ne prime time show.  Atman   Nov-11-10 12:32 AM   #97 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC