You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #5: We don't know yet if she's wrong [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. We don't know yet if she's wrong
Let's just say there's plenty of evidence against that position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Here's my theory re: Olbermann Hailtothechimp  Nov-06-10 11:34 AM   #0 
  - I suspect there was a tip-off, but I hypothesize that "the event"  HereSince1628   Nov-06-10 11:46 AM   #1 
  - Rachel Maddow says the rule applies to all MSNBC hosts. Is she wrong?  emulatorloo   Nov-06-10 11:53 AM   #3 
     - We don't know yet if she's wrong  jgraz   Nov-06-10 12:04 PM   #5 
     - dunno she's right about pretty much everything.  emulatorloo   Nov-06-10 12:10 PM   #7 
        - Almost everything. But when she's wrong, she can be really, really wrong.  jgraz   Nov-06-10 12:20 PM   #9 
           - She probably knows how to read her contract, don't you think?  emulatorloo   Nov-06-10 12:30 PM   #13 
              - That may well be. But it raises the question of unequal enforcement.  EFerrari   Nov-06-10 12:32 PM   #16 
              - she addressed the Joe Scar thing in her comment. She said rule applied to hosts  emulatorloo   Nov-06-10 12:36 PM   #17 
                 - Right. Occam's Razor would say tha a new right wing owner  EFerrari   Nov-06-10 12:39 PM   #19 
                    - then why is Keith's Face and Name still all over the network? Ads, Promos, Pictures  emulatorloo   Nov-06-10 12:50 PM   #20 
                       - We seem to be watching some kind of power struggle.  EFerrari   Nov-06-10 12:52 PM   #22 
              - They've been pretty clear from the beginning this was not a contract violation  jgraz   Nov-06-10 01:34 PM   #24 
     - Sorry, I dropped off to rake leaves...I think it's arguable.  HereSince1628   Nov-06-10 01:24 PM   #23 
     - It's not clear  jeff47   Nov-06-10 03:33 PM   #26 
  - "They want him off the air, because he eviscerated Sister Sarah so completely" That gets RATINGS!  emulatorloo   Nov-06-10 11:50 AM   #2 
  - The problem is ratings are not everything  jeff47   Nov-06-10 03:37 PM   #27 
  - I hadn't heard of the Lewis Black thing until now  arcane1   Nov-06-10 12:00 PM   #4 
  - Thanks, hadn't seen that.  EFerrari   Nov-06-10 12:30 PM   #14 
     - Yeah, that was hilarious and very true. The voice over is Robotic!  emulatorloo   Nov-06-10 12:51 PM   #21 
  - Yeah, he's never done a beat-down before.  HughMoran   Nov-06-10 12:07 PM   #6 
  - Oh, C'mon!! Did you not see the beatdowns Lawrence O'Donnell did on his NEW show??  HughMoran   Nov-06-10 12:11 PM   #8 
  - KO Beatdowns = Ratings = MSNBC gets to Raise its Advertising Rates = $$$$$$$  emulatorloo   Nov-06-10 12:28 PM   #12 
  - So suddenly political contributions are all hush-hush, save  Dreamer Tatum   Nov-06-10 12:22 PM   #10 
  - Someone gave her the story. That's all I'm saying.  Hailtothechimp   Nov-06-10 05:30 PM   #29 
  - I think it's simpler than that...  gmoney   Nov-06-10 12:26 PM   #11 
  - he tested the waters (contributions are public) and got burned  Gin   Nov-06-10 12:31 PM   #15 
     - every mention on MSNBC last night said he will be back.  emulatorloo   Nov-06-10 12:38 PM   #18 
        - Well, this 'temporary' suspension has created quite the shitstorm  jeff47   Nov-06-10 03:41 PM   #28 
  - I think it's one of those useful rules  Liberal Gramma   Nov-06-10 02:07 PM   #25 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC