BzaDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-06-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
| 43. Yeah, like they flushed down Alan Grayson, and Russ Feingold, and Tom Perriello. |
|
Those were "watered-down crap" to you. If only they were "economic populists," they would have won. Got it. 
|
| -House- Progressive Caucus is now the plurality. How the Blue Dogs and New Dems did (badly) |
underpants |
Nov-06-10 10:47 AM |
#0 |
-
Countdown to claims that the progressives caused the losses in... |
Goblinmonger |
Nov-06-10 10:50 AM |
#1 |
-
Excellent. This may make for more of a two party system the |
mmonk |
Nov-06-10 10:52 AM |
#2 |
-
Thanks for this..and the post on the blue Dogs. |
BrklynLiberal |
Nov-06-10 11:10 AM |
#3 |
 -
There was plenty of enthusiasm in the districts the blue dogs lost. |
Recursion |
Nov-06-10 11:53 AM |
#10 |
 -
Yes, we voted enthusiastically. the problem was that there just isn't enough of us. |
CTyankee |
Nov-06-10 04:49 PM |
#37 |
-
That's the upside of this election. k&r |
polichick |
Nov-06-10 11:18 AM |
#4 |
-
It is easy to have a vast majority progressive caucus if your caucus is a powerless minority. |
BzaDem |
Nov-06-10 11:23 AM |
#5 |
 -
I'd rather have a powerless minority than a powerless majority. |
PassingFair |
Nov-06-10 01:37 PM |
#13 |
-
What you are missing is that it is impossible to have a majority AT ALL without significant numbers |
BzaDem |
Nov-06-10 01:50 PM |
#14 |
-
What you are missing is that it is possible to tackle the New Dems head on... |
PassingFair |
Nov-06-10 01:54 PM |
#15 |
 -
The next wave election will either elect lots of blue dogs/new dems, or will not elect a majority. |
BzaDem |
Nov-06-10 02:11 PM |
#17 |
-
How the hell do YOU know? |
PassingFair |
Nov-06-10 02:17 PM |
#18 |
 -
"and people will be desperate for real progress and real representation" |
BzaDem |
Nov-06-10 02:21 PM |
#19 |
-
I am assuming that the people of conservative districts won't continue... |
PassingFair |
Nov-06-10 02:27 PM |
#20 |
-
That is kind of a false assumption though. If they lose their homes, they will blame it on liberals |
BzaDem |
Nov-06-10 03:48 PM |
#24 |
-
Then I guess there is nothing we can do for them. |
PassingFair |
Nov-06-10 04:18 PM |
#29 |
-
Yes, we do need to try to provide for all. To do that, we need a majority, and to get that, we need |
BzaDem |
Nov-06-10 04:40 PM |
#32 |
-
Jeebus, it's the conservative DEMS who stop us from putting the case to the people! |
PassingFair |
Nov-06-10 04:45 PM |
#35 |
-
Yeah, like they flushed down Alan Grayson, and Russ Feingold, and Tom Perriello. |
BzaDem |
Nov-06-10 05:07 PM |
#43 |
 -
TWO Progressives lost. |
PassingFair |
Nov-06-10 05:24 PM |
#47 |
-
Umm, bullshit. You said people were looking for a choice. Grayson was a choice. He lost. n/t |
BzaDem |
Nov-06-10 05:25 PM |
#48 |
-
He also WON. |
PassingFair |
Nov-06-10 05:32 PM |
#50 |
-
He won before he cast votes. As soon as he was actually a Congressperson and cast votes, he lost. |
BzaDem |
Nov-06-10 05:33 PM |
#51 |
-
Bull. He never hid who he was. |
PassingFair |
Nov-06-10 05:40 PM |
#52 |
-
He won on coattails and lost on a wave. That's how those districts work. |
Recursion |
Nov-07-10 12:24 PM |
#64 |
-
And this is what is not being tried. The knee jerk reaction is "move right." |
CTyankee |
Nov-07-10 01:24 PM |
#74 |
-
"These rednecks will turn economic populists soon enough" |
Recursion |
Nov-07-10 01:07 PM |
#72 |
-
I think these center-right Dem coalitions are dead or dying. |
Chan790 |
Nov-06-10 04:43 PM |
#33 |
-
Then there won't be a next time for a Dem House. Once center-right-Dems are revived, then we might |
BzaDem |
Nov-06-10 04:44 PM |
#34 |
-
You need to lay-off the acid koolaid. |
Chan790 |
Nov-06-10 04:55 PM |
#40 |
-
You are correct that the type of Democrat needed to win in some districts might no longer be |
BzaDem |
Nov-06-10 05:05 PM |
#42 |
-
We keep losing the argument and the right keeps moving us more to the right. |
CTyankee |
Nov-06-10 07:05 PM |
#57 |
-
The whole world is moving to the right. Look at europe. |
Recursion |
Nov-07-10 12:32 PM |
#67 |
-
Thankfully you state your basic assumption upfront. |
Chan790 |
Nov-06-10 04:36 PM |
#31 |
-
Have you ever considered that the only way to "fix our message so we can be competitive in those |
BzaDem |
Nov-06-10 04:46 PM |
#36 |
-
Have you considered that people in those districts are rarely offered a choice? |
PassingFair |
Nov-06-10 04:51 PM |
#39 |
 -
Alan Grayson just found out that he can't continue to win in a conservative district. |
BzaDem |
Nov-06-10 05:08 PM |
#44 |
 -
He just did a pretty good job of proving that himself (nt) |
Recursion |
Nov-07-10 05:47 PM |
#76 |
-
No, that's the problem and not the solution. |
Chan790 |
Nov-06-10 05:02 PM |
#41 |
-
I think the problem with your Bohemia-analogy is that it is false. |
BzaDem |
Nov-06-10 05:11 PM |
#45 |
-
Okay, now I see our communication breakdown. |
Chan790 |
Nov-06-10 05:45 PM |
#53 |
-
"..abandoning our own Wall St. friends". Now you've done it! |
PassingFair |
Nov-06-10 05:48 PM |
#54 |
-
Hence, why I say the DLC is dead. n/t |
Chan790 |
Nov-06-10 05:57 PM |
#55 |
-
Hence, why I hope you are right. |
PassingFair |
Nov-06-10 06:00 PM |
#56 |
-
Mikulski, Reid, Feinstein, Nelson, Landrieu, Kerry, Stabenow... |
Recursion |
Nov-07-10 09:26 AM |
#60 |
-
We were talking about the House. |
PassingFair |
Nov-07-10 12:15 PM |
#61 |
-
If Kerry doesn't want to be identified as a DLC member he should leave that caucus |
Recursion |
Nov-07-10 12:21 PM |
#63 |
-
He's not "in" that caucus. He's a Senator n/t |
PassingFair |
Nov-07-10 12:28 PM |
#65 |
-
Yes, he is in the Senate New Democrat Coalition |
Recursion |
Nov-07-10 12:29 PM |
#66 |
-
You're right...I had no idea he'd become so "out" about it. |
PassingFair |
Nov-07-10 12:43 PM |
#68 |
-
Sure, in the primaries. He was trying to capitalize on Dean's momentum |
Recursion |
Nov-07-10 12:46 PM |
#69 |
-
DLC=Democrats Lose Congress |
MannyGoldstein |
Nov-06-10 11:29 AM |
#6 |
-
95% of the Progressive Caucus won reelection, eh? |
Arkana |
Nov-06-10 11:30 AM |
#7 |
 -
It's now buttered in a much smaller part of the country |
Recursion |
Nov-06-10 11:49 AM |
#8 |
 -
And what does that prove? That if you draw a district so that the Democrat can't lose |
tritsofme |
Nov-06-10 02:09 PM |
#16 |
-
That's a new euphemisim..'front line districts' |
Bluenorthwest |
Nov-06-10 04:05 PM |
#26 |
 -
Yep. And progressives would never have won those districts in the first place. (nt) |
Recursion |
Nov-07-10 12:49 PM |
#70 |
-
Yes there is that |
underpants |
Nov-06-10 08:58 PM |
#59 |
-
Good data. Now find a progressive that can win in the districts the blue dogs lost |
Recursion |
Nov-06-10 11:50 AM |
#9 |
 -
Clone Rep. DeFazio? |
0rganism |
Nov-06-10 02:27 PM |
#21 |
  -
Coastal Oregon? |
Recursion |
Nov-06-10 03:46 PM |
#23 |
   -
'Costal Oregon' is a terrible descriptor for the 4th |
Bluenorthwest |
Nov-06-10 04:14 PM |
#28 |
  -
+1 |
LWolf |
Nov-06-10 04:24 PM |
#30 |
  -
who says that OR-4 is a "republican advantage district"? |
onenote |
Nov-07-10 01:21 PM |
#73 |
 -
Yeah, I still don't get that. They elected a Democrat for the 12 years before DeFazio (nt) |
Recursion |
Nov-07-10 05:46 PM |
#75 |
 -
New Deal |
countrydad58 |
Nov-06-10 03:53 PM |
#25 |
 -
This is the rub |
treestar |
Nov-06-10 04:49 PM |
#38 |
  -
The American voters, even in conservative leaning districts would not |
de novo |
Nov-07-10 12:50 PM |
#71 |
 -
I expect it will be: |
Chan790 |
Nov-06-10 05:16 PM |
#46 |
-
Good riddance. |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Nov-06-10 01:26 PM |
#11 |
-
K&R. |
Greyhound |
Nov-06-10 01:33 PM |
#12 |
-
Kick. n/t |
PassingFair |
Nov-06-10 03:19 PM |
#22 |
-
You can only sell Blue Dog bullshit for so long, then it catches up with you. n/t |
Jefferson23 |
Nov-06-10 04:10 PM |
#27 |
-
It's still a 64 seat deficit. |
Skidmore |
Nov-06-10 05:29 PM |
#49 |
-
"Mommy, I'm thirsty" |
SoCalDem |
Nov-06-10 07:15 PM |
#58 |
-
There you have it. The silver lining in the 2010 election debacle. eom |
NorthCarolina |
Nov-07-10 12:20 PM |
#62 |