| -Ralph Nader: Dems Face Losses to "Most Craven Republican Party in History" |
YankeeLeft7x |
Nov-02-10 12:42 PM |
#0 |
 -
Recommend. nt |
TBF |
Nov-02-10 12:43 PM |
#1 |
  -
ralph should know about craven, the bastard, STFU, Ralph. |
roguevalley |
Nov-02-10 04:55 PM |
#68 |
| -
you are part of the problem. nt |
tomp |
Nov-02-10 07:47 PM |
#101 |
| -
and you make me laugh. I am a hard left dem who was a member |
roguevalley |
Nov-03-10 12:25 AM |
#135 |
| -
Just because Nader went asshat, doesn't mean the words he spake are wrong... |
LooseWilly |
Nov-03-10 03:07 AM |
#154 |
| -
He's at least right about this, don't know about all of that |
CommonSensePLZ |
Nov-03-10 09:53 AM |
#227 |
| -
OK, but is he correct or not in what he says here? nt |
guruoo |
Nov-03-10 11:39 AM |
#249 |
| -
I have no love for ralph |
Confusious |
Nov-02-10 07:56 PM |
#106 |
| -
Nader gave the white house to Bush in 2000 |
txlibdem |
Nov-03-10 07:32 AM |
#192 |
| -
+1 |
BlancheSplanchnik |
Nov-03-10 08:05 AM |
#198 |
| -
:-) |
txlibdem |
Nov-03-10 08:31 AM |
#204 |
| -
for t hose of us who are interested in truth, anyway. |
BlancheSplanchnik |
Nov-03-10 08:47 AM |
#211 |
| -
for t hose of us who are interested in truth, anyway. |
AlbertCat |
Nov-03-10 09:26 AM |
#222 |
| -
The truth gets in the way of a good hippie punching. |
Ignis |
Nov-03-10 01:05 PM |
#301 |
| -
yep |
BlancheSplanchnik |
Nov-03-10 04:35 PM |
#329 |
| -
Yeah but |
NewYorkerfromMass |
Nov-03-10 08:33 AM |
#206 |
| -
Yep. |
peace frog |
Nov-03-10 08:41 AM |
#209 |
| -
It's Nader's "credibility" which creates fear for Repugs and Dems .... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 10:58 AM |
#236 |
| -
Nader can pontificate to his gingantic ego's content |
peace frog |
Nov-03-10 12:10 PM |
#277 |
| -
If YOU weren't listening, you wouldn't be posting on this thread ... nor |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 01:36 PM |
#311 |
| -
It's a simple statement of fact |
peace frog |
Nov-03-10 02:10 PM |
#314 |
| -
Rather, looks more like your "outsized ego" may be driving your anti-Nader comments ..... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 02:16 PM |
#315 |
| -
Project much? |
peace frog |
Nov-03-10 02:18 PM |
#316 |
| -
Were you "projecting" in the way you spoke of Nader ... ??? |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 03:52 PM |
#326 |
| -
Well, now I know projection is your problem |
peace frog |
Nov-03-10 04:21 PM |
#327 |
| -
I didn't know he was paid by the Bushies... |
PerpetuallyDazed |
Nov-03-10 08:58 AM |
#213 |
| -
Bush would not have won against Gore. |
AlbertCat |
Nov-03-10 09:22 AM |
#220 |
| -
Supreme Court had nothing to do with it .... nor |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 10:36 AM |
#232 |
| -
I know this will be lost in the hundreds of posts |
jimmil |
Nov-03-10 12:07 PM |
#273 |
| -
Gore actually won anyway. nt |
Enthusiast |
Nov-03-10 12:35 PM |
#293 |
| -
K&R -- terrific comments -- |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 01:41 PM |
#312 |
| -
Don't forget the 10's of thousands removed by Choicepoint for being "felons"... |
JanMichael |
Nov-03-10 09:46 PM |
#344 |
| -
I Agree |
WizardLeft62 |
Nov-06-10 01:24 AM |
#352 |
| -
+2 |
MidwestTransplant |
Nov-03-10 12:50 PM |
#298 |
| -
Give it a rest, stupid |
ProudDad |
Nov-03-10 01:03 PM |
#300 |
| -
goddamn! |
docvet |
Nov-03-10 02:04 PM |
#313 |
| -
It's easier to be simple-minded about Gore's and the DLC's fuckup |
ProudDad |
Nov-03-10 07:36 PM |
#334 |
| -
STFU, Ralph. The elections aren't over yet. n/t |
FSogol |
Nov-02-10 12:43 PM |
#2 |
| -
why isn't mine safety an issue? |
Enrique |
Nov-02-10 12:46 PM |
#3 |
| -
No one care about anything that doesn't affect them |
demosincebirth |
Nov-02-10 02:17 PM |
#27 |
| -
Didn't you hear? |
Capitalocracy |
Nov-02-10 03:16 PM |
#37 |
| -
Thanks Ralph for your indispensible help in enabling their victories! |
BzaDem |
Nov-02-10 12:49 PM |
#4 |
| -
+1 |
moondust |
Nov-02-10 12:53 PM |
#9 |
| -
Co-sign |
AspenRose |
Nov-02-10 12:55 PM |
#11 |
| -
Scooch over a little more, woodja? nt |
blondeatlast |
Nov-02-10 03:46 PM |
#45 |
| -
+1 |
gulliver |
Nov-02-10 01:26 PM |
#20 |
| -
+1000000000! |
UrbScotty |
Nov-02-10 02:20 PM |
#28 |
| -
Indeed. +1 |
apocalypsehow |
Nov-02-10 02:35 PM |
#34 |
| -
Why, because if he didn't run the Republicans wouldn't have stolen the election? nt |
Capitalocracy |
Nov-02-10 03:17 PM |
#38 |
| -
if ralph didn't run, then those 200,000+ dems would've never voted for bush |
frylock |
Nov-02-10 04:35 PM |
#51 |
| -
If Ralph didn't run, Gore would have been President even if the 200k dems voted for Bush. |
BzaDem |
Nov-02-10 04:36 PM |
#52 |
| -
who are you to decide who should and who shouldn't run? |
frylock |
Nov-02-10 04:41 PM |
#56 |
| -
Nope. When people disagree with "if ralph didn't run," our education system is FUCKING dead |
BzaDem |
Nov-02-10 04:48 PM |
#63 |
| -
+1 |
mac56 |
Nov-02-10 04:55 PM |
#67 |
| -
your argument is fucking ridiculous.. |
frylock |
Nov-02-10 04:59 PM |
#73 |
| -
That's too bad for you, since states containing over 1/8 of the population will be informing voters |
BzaDem |
Nov-03-10 05:43 AM |
#169 |
| -
I find it ironic how you are ranting about logic, but not using it. |
D23MIURG23 |
Nov-02-10 07:45 PM |
#100 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-02-10 11:36 PM |
#128 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-03-10 03:19 AM |
#158 |
| -
"You have no basis for assuming that they would have voted for Gore if Nader wasn't running." |
BzaDem |
Nov-03-10 05:27 AM |
#162 |
| -
if they "would have" voted for Gore, why didn't they? |
ima_sinnic |
Nov-03-10 06:21 AM |
#175 |
| -
"Who are you to presume who Nader voters "would have" voted for?" |
BzaDem |
Nov-03-10 06:27 AM |
#178 |
| -
no it's not "obvious," sheesh. if they "would have" voted for Gore, why didn't they? |
ima_sinnic |
Nov-03-10 06:53 AM |
#181 |
| -
Because Nader was an option. If he wasn't an option on the ballot, enough would have voted for Gore |
BzaDem |
Nov-03-10 11:43 AM |
#253 |
| -
I'm serious, and I argue otherwise, b/c all you can do is speculate, number 1, |
ima_sinnic |
Nov-03-10 04:58 PM |
#330 |
| -
According to you, California's voting system in 2012 will somehow be "fascist." |
BzaDem |
Nov-03-10 09:38 PM |
#340 |
| -
Do you have any idea how fucking fascist that sounds? |
PerpetuallyDazed |
Nov-03-10 09:06 AM |
#215 |
| -
That sounds like a corporatist authoritarian position? What? People who throw that word around... |
fishbulb703 |
Nov-03-10 04:31 PM |
#328 |
| -
Bullying others to vote in YOUR interest, yes |
PerpetuallyDazed |
Nov-03-10 09:09 PM |
#338 |
| -
Excellent points! |
pberq |
Nov-03-10 09:23 AM |
#221 |
| -
The Socialist Workers Party candidate got thousands of votes also, but they never |
John Q. Citizen |
Nov-03-10 11:45 AM |
#257 |
| -
So what? One person isn't responsible because there were other people also responsible? |
BzaDem |
Nov-03-10 11:47 AM |
#260 |
| -
Um.......yes that's how it works |
LiberalLovinLug |
Nov-03-10 02:49 PM |
#323 |
| -
I never said ALL the blame was on Nader. I simply said that if Nader didn't run, Gore would have |
BzaDem |
Nov-03-10 06:08 PM |
#333 |
| -
No, he wouldn't. Nader was not even a factor. The Neocons |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-03-10 08:05 PM |
#336 |
| -
People who admit that Nader prevented Gore from being inaugurated are in the MINORITY? |
BzaDem |
Nov-03-10 09:39 PM |
#341 |
| -
If Gore had given those 200K a reason to vote for him.... |
Prana69 |
Nov-02-10 11:56 PM |
#132 |
| -
Yes. |
suzie |
Nov-03-10 02:08 AM |
#137 |
| -
GORE lost the election. |
alarimer |
Nov-03-10 05:42 AM |
#168 |
| -
Ralph Nader did nothing to build his so-called party |
gort |
Nov-02-10 05:11 PM |
#78 |
| -
and what have democrats done to insure something like that never happens again? |
frylock |
Nov-02-10 05:21 PM |
#81 |
| -
What did Ralph do? |
gort |
Nov-02-10 05:44 PM |
#86 |
| -
What did Ralph do? |
Capitalocracy |
Nov-02-10 06:02 PM |
#91 |
| -
Seatbelts? That's All You Got??? |
ProfessorGAC |
Nov-02-10 06:12 PM |
#92 |
| -
Me too....nt |
Enthusiast |
Nov-03-10 12:39 PM |
#294 |
| -
you didn't answer my question.. |
frylock |
Nov-02-10 06:17 PM |
#93 |
| -
What Ralph did |
gort |
Nov-02-10 07:37 PM |
#98 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-02-10 07:43 PM |
#99 |
| -
The way I see it... |
Chulanowa |
Nov-03-10 12:47 AM |
#136 |
| -
Viewing the wars and the MFing Patriot act |
eilen |
Nov-03-10 06:56 AM |
#182 |
| -
It means more than not voting |
Chulanowa |
Nov-03-10 03:05 PM |
#324 |
| -
Tell it, Brother. Few words and straight to point. I salute you. |
Pooka Fey |
Nov-03-10 09:12 AM |
#216 |
| -
Al Gore won the 2000 election. The USSC stole it for Bush. |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-02-10 08:58 PM |
#114 |
| -
Nader delivered the election to Republicans for money and fame. |
suzie |
Nov-03-10 02:11 AM |
#138 |
| -
What's ugly is distorting history. |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-03-10 02:28 AM |
#143 |
| -
What's ugly is the constant apologism for an egomaniac who prefers enabling Republicans |
suzie |
Nov-03-10 02:36 AM |
#146 |
| -
Ding Ding Ding! |
Pooka Fey |
Nov-03-10 09:16 AM |
#218 |
| -
Right ... this DLC "chestnut" continues be put on display here -- silly as it is ...!! |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 11:13 AM |
#240 |
| -
Gore should have thrown his support to Nader and quit. |
AnArmyVeteran |
Nov-03-10 10:29 AM |
#230 |
| -
It was 300,000 "Democrats" in FLORIDA who voted for W ..... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 11:12 AM |
#239 |
| -
It was "300,000" Democrats in Florida who voted for W ..... but that was also Nader's fault--!! |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 11:09 AM |
#238 |
| -
Hear, hear. |
wakemewhenitsover |
Nov-02-10 11:13 PM |
#125 |
| -
Oh if I could recommend a post... |
calimary |
Nov-02-10 03:20 PM |
#39 |
| -
Nader had nothing to do with W stealing the election .... and GORE WON!! |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 11:20 AM |
#242 |
| -
Thank you for clarifying |
Enthusiast |
Nov-03-10 12:44 PM |
#295 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-02-10 04:34 PM |
#48 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-02-10 04:34 PM |
#50 |
| -
ooooooohh BURN.. |
frylock |
Nov-02-10 04:37 PM |
#53 |
| -
Sure. Let's talk about how Gore would have been President EVEN IF 200k dems voted for Bush |
BzaDem |
Nov-02-10 04:39 PM |
#55 |
| -
So actual leftists are supposed to drop out to allow status-quo centrists to win? |
Naturyl |
Nov-02-10 04:41 PM |
#57 |
| -
YES. How could this not be clear. They are supposed to run in a Democratic primary |
BzaDem |
Nov-02-10 04:46 PM |
#62 |
| -
ralph didn't run as a democrat.. |
frylock |
Nov-02-10 05:03 PM |
#75 |
| -
Again, what we really need is an open primary, so that the general is between the two candidates |
BzaDem |
Nov-03-10 05:33 AM |
#164 |
| -
They are only "supposed" to do that in your imagination. |
D23MIURG23 |
Nov-02-10 08:11 PM |
#109 |
| -
The real problem is that they are even allowed to run as a spoiler. The general election should be a |
BzaDem |
Nov-03-10 05:30 AM |
#163 |
| -
Wow, what a statement. I say NO. I say actual centrists are supposed to form their own party |
Leopolds Ghost |
Nov-03-10 03:14 AM |
#157 |
| -
yes, that's their argument.. |
frylock |
Nov-02-10 04:56 PM |
#69 |
| -
well gee, how can i argue with a roffle smiley.. |
frylock |
Nov-02-10 04:44 PM |
#60 |
| -
Gore WAS elected President in FL. But you apparently don't read newspapers so you wouldnt know that. |
Leopolds Ghost |
Nov-03-10 03:11 AM |
#156 |
| -
He may have been elected, but he wasn't President in 2001. He would have been had Ralph Nader |
BzaDem |
Nov-03-10 05:38 AM |
#165 |
| -
bullshit |
ima_sinnic |
Nov-03-10 06:39 AM |
#179 |
| -
Whoever said anything about "everybody?" If 1% of them voted for Gore, Gore would have been sworn in |
BzaDem |
Nov-03-10 06:48 AM |
#180 |
| -
gee, if Bush had dropped out, there would have been 100% certainty of Gore, right? |
ima_sinnic |
Nov-03-10 07:04 AM |
#186 |
| -
Thank you! |
M_A |
Nov-03-10 08:26 AM |
#202 |
| -
Ha Ha! - excellent! I love it! |
pberq |
Nov-03-10 09:31 AM |
#223 |
| -
Nope. But if Nader dropped out, Gore would have easily won. |
BzaDem |
Nov-03-10 11:01 AM |
#237 |
| -
there is no "difference" betw Bush dropping out & Nader dropping out, because |
ima_sinnic |
Nov-03-10 11:17 AM |
#241 |
| -
Just because you deny reality doesn't mean reality somehow isn't reality. |
BzaDem |
Nov-03-10 11:41 AM |
#251 |
| -
whatever. how about if they ran someone who people would RATHER vote for than Nader? problem solved! |
ima_sinnic |
Nov-03-10 05:27 PM |
#331 |
| -
Nonsense ... Bush won by 500+ votes in Florida ... Buchanan "won" 3,000+ votes on |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 11:34 AM |
#246 |
| -
Plus fucking one! |
Enthusiast |
Nov-03-10 12:48 PM |
#296 |
| -
Flash News: The 2000 election was stolen by GOP -- |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 11:30 AM |
#245 |
| -
Democratic Senators voted for Bush's Supreme Court appointments. |
Better Believe It |
Nov-02-10 04:52 PM |
#65 |
| -
You REALLY think that Republicans would just sit back and allow Democrats to deny him any |
BzaDem |
Nov-02-10 04:54 PM |
#66 |
| -
You're making my point. Thank you! Like I and others have pointed |
Better Believe It |
Nov-02-10 09:08 PM |
#118 |
| -
You are (as always) missing the point. Republicans didn't vote against cloture for any of Obama's |
BzaDem |
Nov-03-10 05:41 AM |
#167 |
| -
You're changing the subject. But the new point you made is just plain wrong. |
Better Believe It |
Nov-03-10 09:01 AM |
#214 |
| -
The SC Court in an act of treason, handed the election to George |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-02-10 08:51 PM |
#112 |
| -
Nader delivered the election to the Republicans. |
suzie |
Nov-03-10 02:13 AM |
#139 |
| -
Repeating a distortion doesn't make it true. |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-03-10 02:34 AM |
#145 |
| -
In your unending apologism for Ralph Nader, you're simply unwilling to look at the facts. |
suzie |
Nov-03-10 02:48 AM |
#149 |
| -
You can whine all you want about the electoral process and refuse |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-03-10 03:02 AM |
#153 |
| -
Re-read Sabrina's post. |
Enthusiast |
Nov-03-10 12:52 PM |
#299 |
| -
I don't contest that. |
suzie |
Nov-03-10 02:38 PM |
#320 |
| -
You're the one unwilling to face facts... |
ProudDad |
Nov-03-10 01:22 PM |
#308 |
| -
Thank you. |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-03-10 08:01 PM |
#335 |
| -
+1 |
Le Taz Hot |
Nov-03-10 05:55 AM |
#171 |
| -
+1000% -- |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 11:38 AM |
#248 |
| -
Exactly....nt |
Enthusiast |
Nov-03-10 12:50 PM |
#297 |
| -
No, it was Democratics falling over each other to get across that... |
TheMadMonk |
Nov-02-10 09:09 PM |
#119 |
| -
Your are |
wutangfan85 |
Nov-03-10 05:39 AM |
#166 |
| -
True... we now have one right wing party and one radical right wing party -- !! |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 11:39 AM |
#250 |
| -
Exactly. |
LiberalLovinLug |
Nov-03-10 03:09 PM |
#325 |
| -
+10 |
nilram |
Nov-03-10 02:19 AM |
#141 |
| -
+100000000000000000000 |
Zoeisright |
Nov-03-10 07:13 AM |
#190 |
| -
+1 |
Deep13 |
Nov-03-10 07:48 AM |
#194 |
| -
Right. Thanks, Ralph! nt |
onehandle |
Nov-03-10 08:15 AM |
#199 |
| -
+ thousands |
Joe Bacon |
Nov-03-10 09:15 AM |
#217 |
| -
Did asshole say something? |
BeyondGeography |
Nov-02-10 12:49 PM |
#5 |
| -
I'm still pissed at Ralph for 2000... but I agree with him here. |
apnu |
Nov-02-10 12:51 PM |
#6 |
| -
Ralph had nothing to do with Bush "win" .... by, eh, less than 600 votes in Florida .... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 11:42 AM |
#252 |
| -
Nader seems to have changed his tune from 2000. |
BootinUp |
Nov-02-10 12:52 PM |
#7 |
| -
Yeah, no kidding. I mean, I thought both parties were the SAME |
Zoeisright |
Nov-03-10 07:14 AM |
#191 |
| -
You know, anger can really be blinding ... you should reread the article .... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 11:44 AM |
#255 |
| -
Go Ralph! |
the redcoat |
Nov-02-10 12:53 PM |
#8 |
| -
Ralph Nader: instant unrecommend n/t |
LoZoccolo |
Nov-02-10 12:54 PM |
#10 |
| -
Ralph Nader instant rec. One of the smartest men in America |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-02-10 09:00 PM |
#116 |
| -
+1,000 and thank you - nt |
inna |
Nov-02-10 11:28 PM |
#126 |
| -
The SCOTUS simply stopped the vote-counting. |
suzie |
Nov-03-10 02:26 AM |
#142 |
| -
They interfered in the electoral process, a violation of the Constitution |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-03-10 02:48 AM |
#148 |
| -
Bugliosi uses the imagery of the giant squid that puts out clouds of ink |
suzie |
Nov-03-10 02:57 AM |
#152 |
| -
You are doing a fine job of defending criminals. I will leave you to |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-03-10 03:09 AM |
#155 |
| -
What are you even talking about--"Trial and conviction?". |
suzie |
Nov-03-10 03:36 AM |
#159 |
| -
+1000 nt |
pberq |
Nov-03-10 09:37 AM |
#224 |
| -
+1000% -- |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 11:44 AM |
#256 |
| -
I'm not a fan of his choice in 2000, but I do like seatbelts. nt |
Exultant Democracy |
Nov-03-10 11:59 AM |
#265 |
| -
I thought he made good points |
JonLP24 |
Nov-02-10 12:56 PM |
#12 |
| -
just another inconvenient truth for the nader haters |
frylock |
Nov-02-10 04:38 PM |
#54 |
| -
They really are an impressive bunch aren't they? |
depakid |
Nov-02-10 04:59 PM |
#72 |
| -
they rival the teabaggers in their ignorance.. |
frylock |
Nov-02-10 05:05 PM |
#76 |
| -
dupe |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 11:46 AM |
#258 |
| -
Quite a few of them know the truth ... but continue to try to spread animosity for Nader here .... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 11:47 AM |
#259 |
| -
Those same 300,000 dixiecrats vote for Republicans in every election. |
suzie |
Nov-03-10 02:28 PM |
#317 |
| -
Lotta un-reccing going on... |
disillusioned73 |
Nov-02-10 12:57 PM |
#13 |
| -
It's a conspiracy. |
Lil Missy |
Nov-02-10 01:19 PM |
#18 |
| -
nah... the truth just hurts |
fascisthunter |
Nov-02-10 03:46 PM |
#44 |
| -
Really? |
MilesColtrane |
Nov-02-10 01:01 PM |
#14 |
| -
Clear vision a decade late. |
hay rick |
Nov-02-10 01:02 PM |
#15 |
| -
The Republican Bush Pioneers Nader took money from didn't seem too bad. |
Ikonoklast |
Nov-02-10 05:20 PM |
#80 |
| -
Defend the voters from the Republicans? |
treestar |
Nov-02-10 01:03 PM |
#16 |
| -
K&R |
leftstreet |
Nov-02-10 01:04 PM |
#17 |
| -
Fuck Nader... |
SidDithers |
Nov-02-10 01:25 PM |
#19 |
| -
I wish people would channel their anger againt dems who fail to represent them |
beforeyoureyes |
Nov-02-10 01:29 PM |
#21 |
| -
Or against Republicans instead of one of our own progressives, Ralph Nader. |
Better Believe It |
Nov-02-10 02:28 PM |
#31 |
| -
Nader is not a progressive--he enabled the 8 years of the Bush presidency. |
suzie |
Nov-03-10 02:29 AM |
#144 |
| -
Good luck with that. |
mmonk |
Nov-02-10 05:23 PM |
#83 |
| -
+1 |
readmoreoften |
Nov-02-10 07:49 PM |
#103 |
| -
Until Dem recognize his wisdom, this country will be swallowed completely by corporate rule |
kgnu_fan |
Nov-02-10 01:58 PM |
#22 |
| -
I would, had he run as a Democrat. |
WinkyDink |
Nov-02-10 02:00 PM |
#25 |
| -
Democratic Party leaders like Rahm Emanuel would bury Ralph if he ran as a Democrat. |
Better Believe It |
Nov-02-10 04:43 PM |
#59 |
| -
I used past verb tense. :-) |
WinkyDink |
Nov-03-10 06:16 AM |
#172 |
| -
So only "democrats" have a lock on the Truth, eh? |
ProudDad |
Nov-03-10 01:16 PM |
#305 |
| -
Who, in their right mind, cares what... |
hayu_lol |
Nov-02-10 02:03 PM |
#26 |
| -
People who understand his decades long fight against corporatism, for one .... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 11:49 AM |
#261 |
| -
So he's found his voice against Republicans at last. |
WinkyDink |
Nov-02-10 01:59 PM |
#23 |
| -
More than a dime NOW, Nader? |
Canuckistanian |
Nov-02-10 02:00 PM |
#24 |
| -
You confusing Nader with George Wallace from the 60's. Might want to study political history a bit |
Better Believe It |
Nov-02-10 02:41 PM |
#35 |
| -
That's a curious reply. Just because Wallace said it, doesn't mean Nader hasn't acted like that's |
apocalypsehow |
Nov-02-10 03:33 PM |
#41 |
| -
Hmm... |
Canuckistanian |
Nov-02-10 03:40 PM |
#42 |
| -
Will "TweedleDum and TweedleDumber" do? Because I heard RN say that with my own 2 ears. |
WinkyDink |
Nov-02-10 04:34 PM |
#49 |
| -
Oh, bite me, Ralph. |
Skidmore |
Nov-02-10 02:21 PM |
#29 |
| -
Our progressive friend and truth teller Ralph Nader just nailed it! |
Better Believe It |
Nov-02-10 02:26 PM |
#30 |
| -
Bad news ... but DU has to hear it --- "Thank you," RALPH NADER... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-02-10 02:29 PM |
#32 |
| -
apocalypshow to Ralph Nader: FUCK OFF. n/t. |
apocalypsehow |
Nov-02-10 02:34 PM |
#33 |
| -
Ralph Nader isn't always right. |
glitch |
Nov-02-10 02:52 PM |
#36 |
| -
Ralph is Right. |
Naturyl |
Nov-02-10 03:25 PM |
#40 |
| -
So sez the poster who didn't vote. |
blondeatlast |
Nov-02-10 03:49 PM |
#46 |
| -
Thanks for the promise to harass me. |
Naturyl |
Nov-02-10 04:32 PM |
#47 |
| -
Please do. Please harass. We'll be sure to keep track of your violations. |
readmoreoften |
Nov-02-10 08:58 PM |
#113 |
| -
He _was_ wrong to try |
dbmk |
Nov-03-10 06:58 AM |
#183 |
| -
He's Right |
fascisthunter |
Nov-02-10 03:45 PM |
#43 |
| -
Might I point out that first little button with the little red arrow? |
Jackpine Radical |
Nov-02-10 04:42 PM |
#58 |
| -
Fuck you, Ralph |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody |
Nov-02-10 04:46 PM |
#61 |
| -
+1 |
proteus_lives |
Nov-02-10 05:07 PM |
#77 |
| -
Nader can go to hell! |
A Cooper |
Nov-02-10 04:50 PM |
#64 |
| -
Blurring the contrast between the parties is one of the reasons Dems are in this situation |
depakid |
Nov-02-10 04:56 PM |
#70 |
| -
word |
frylock |
Nov-02-10 05:21 PM |
#82 |
| -
+1,000,000 |
readmoreoften |
Nov-02-10 08:58 PM |
#115 |
| -
What?!? |
Spike from MN |
Nov-03-10 06:59 AM |
#184 |
| -
+1 n/t |
Catherina |
Nov-03-10 09:40 PM |
#342 |
| -
Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn once in awhile. |
mac56 |
Nov-02-10 04:58 PM |
#71 |
| -
While I do agree... |
kenfrequed |
Nov-02-10 05:00 PM |
#74 |
| -
Dear Ralph. Fuck you very much. Sincerely, Real Dems Everywhere. nt |
mistertrickster |
Nov-02-10 05:13 PM |
#79 |
| -
Looks like "real Dems" are having trouble distinguishing themselves |
depakid |
Nov-02-10 05:39 PM |
#84 |
| -
And yet, oddly, the voters had no trouble picking out the R's yesterday . . . nt |
mistertrickster |
Nov-03-10 08:35 AM |
#208 |
| -
Yep, they dumped your friends the blue-dogs |
ProudDad |
Nov-03-10 01:17 PM |
#306 |
| -
You have me confused with Art-in-Ark. I HATE the bluedogs. nt |
mistertrickster |
Nov-04-10 09:05 AM |
#347 |
| -
This real Dem, unless you're an authority on 'real Dems' |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-03-10 02:51 AM |
#150 |
| -
Being right is not enough. One also has to DO what's right. |
mistertrickster |
Nov-03-10 08:33 AM |
#207 |
| -
Some People Can't Handle The Truth... n/t |
humbled_opinion |
Nov-02-10 05:42 PM |
#85 |
| -
Nader was a Rove dirty trick |
bongbong |
Nov-02-10 05:52 PM |
#87 |
| -
Nader was around with the same message way before Rove got power. |
barb162 |
Nov-02-10 10:48 PM |
#123 |
| -
Your point? |
bongbong |
Nov-03-10 08:32 AM |
#205 |
| -
The point is Nader had his ideas fully formulated before Rove |
barb162 |
Nov-03-10 06:06 PM |
#332 |
| -
Your point? |
bongbong |
Nov-03-10 09:31 PM |
#339 |
| -
Nader has been fighting corporatism/fascism for decades...whether Rep or Dem ... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 11:53 AM |
#262 |
| -
Lots of explanation |
bongbong |
Nov-03-10 01:06 PM |
#302 |
| -
BEFORE you change the subject ... deal with FLORIDA and the less than 600 vote "win" .... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 01:31 PM |
#310 |
| -
asdf |
bongbong |
Nov-03-10 02:47 PM |
#322 |
| -
So still don't get your comment re "repigs" .... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 08:26 PM |
#337 |
| -
asdf 2 |
bongbong |
Nov-03-10 09:46 PM |
#343 |
| -
NPR has long been gone -- 20 years I'd say.... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-04-10 01:04 AM |
#345 |
| -
asdf 3 |
bongbong |
Nov-04-10 11:06 AM |
#348 |
| -
Yes ... Supreme Court put W in the White House in 2000 -- nothing to do with Nader --- |
defendandprotect |
Nov-04-10 05:19 PM |
#349 |
| -
asdf 4 |
bongbong |
Nov-05-10 06:18 AM |
#350 |
| -
I used to be a Nader hater |
Ratty |
Nov-02-10 05:55 PM |
#88 |
| -
It's a real dilemma, not something to hate people over |
Capitalocracy |
Nov-02-10 06:48 PM |
#96 |
| -
Honestly, the Democratic Party seems incapable of learning |
eilen |
Nov-03-10 07:09 AM |
#188 |
| -
Nader is a danger to both corporate parties ... that's why he was scapegoated ..... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 11:55 AM |
#264 |
| -
You people know there's an element of truth in his comments. That's why |
Marr |
Nov-02-10 05:57 PM |
#89 |
| -
Ummm...my anger is not a finite quantity. BTW: Is Nader a Democrat? No? So I am not breaking a DU |
WinkyDink |
Nov-03-10 06:19 AM |
#173 |
| -
Thanks for all your help, you bloated, egotistical gasbag! |
Arkana |
Nov-02-10 05:58 PM |
#90 |
| -
Supreme Court put Bush in White House ... not Nader -- |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:00 PM |
#266 |
| -
can't blame this one on Nader |
ibegurpard |
Nov-02-10 06:21 PM |
#94 |
| -
Nader and Goodman STILL saying vote 3rd party |
KossackRealityCheck |
Nov-02-10 06:30 PM |
#95 |
| -
There's no way to invent another party |
trukdivad |
Nov-02-10 07:01 PM |
#97 |
| -
Hey Ralph thanks for making this night possible...... |
Historic NY |
Nov-02-10 07:48 PM |
#102 |
| -
How in the hell did Ralph Nader make this possible? |
Marr |
Nov-02-10 07:52 PM |
#105 |
| -
Thanks Nader for starting the old ball rolling |
Raine |
Nov-02-10 07:52 PM |
#104 |
| -
Wish I could say he was wrong. |
The Gunslinger |
Nov-02-10 08:10 PM |
#107 |
| -
Strange talk from a third party candidate who split the progressive vote. |
herbm |
Nov-02-10 08:10 PM |
#108 |
| -
Perhaps you should re read the article .... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:01 PM |
#267 |
| -
Strange talk from a third party candidate who split the progressive vote. |
herbm |
Nov-02-10 08:12 PM |
#110 |
| -
STFU, Ralph. |
travelingtypist |
Nov-02-10 08:38 PM |
#111 |
| -
He is right, so he will be vilified... we OWN this loss BUT |
ShamelessHussy |
Nov-02-10 09:02 PM |
#117 |
| -
+1000% -- |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:02 PM |
#268 |
| -
thanks Ralph for Bushco |
glinda |
Nov-02-10 09:23 PM |
#120 |
| -
You nailed it, Ralph. But you're yelling into the abyss. Still, I thank you. Rec. |
bertman |
Nov-02-10 10:34 PM |
#121 |
| -
Rec. |
rtassi |
Nov-02-10 11:03 PM |
#124 |
| -
K&R -- Oh, they hear it .... and that's why they're so furious with Nader and criticism of Dems....! |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:03 PM |
#269 |
| -
I will exercise my first ammendment rights. Fuck Ralph Nader, and yes I believe he contributed to |
still_one |
Nov-02-10 10:36 PM |
#122 |
| -
those who deny it are idiots or teabaggers, oh, that's redundent |
digidigido |
Nov-02-10 11:38 PM |
#129 |
| -
Gore won 2000, including in Florida .... you're passing the point of |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:04 PM |
#270 |
| -
K&R +86 |
inna |
Nov-02-10 11:33 PM |
#127 |
| -
Naderbaiters are like Baggers--except that they should know better nt |
MisterP |
Nov-02-10 11:46 PM |
#130 |
| -
Think most of them do know better re 2000, but their main thrust is to try |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:06 PM |
#271 |
| -
He's right and he's always been right. |
RadicalTexan |
Nov-02-10 11:48 PM |
#131 |
| -
I agree with Nader |
stormpilot |
Nov-03-10 12:08 AM |
#133 |
| -
Nader has been dedicated to beating corporatism whether Rep or Dem..... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:07 PM |
#274 |
| -
once again thank you for President Bush |
bottomofthehill |
Nov-03-10 12:09 AM |
#134 |
| -
Another nonsensical statement about the theft of the 2000 election. |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-03-10 02:52 AM |
#151 |
| -
How do you think Florida was even close enough to steal? |
WinkyDink |
Nov-03-10 06:20 AM |
#174 |
| -
For the same reason that many elections are close enough to steal |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-03-10 07:07 AM |
#187 |
| -
The Supreme Court decided Florida |
Jim_Shorts |
Nov-03-10 10:23 AM |
#228 |
| -
Bush "won" in Florida by less than 600 votes ... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:08 PM |
#275 |
| -
People hate it when it turns out he was right |
upi402 |
Nov-03-10 02:16 AM |
#140 |
| -
And, boy has Nader been right ... been warning us about corporatism/fascism for decades!! |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:09 PM |
#276 |
| -
Ahh, Ralph, Cassandra of our time. But you're welcome to put out your eyes if you disagree. |
Umbral |
Nov-03-10 02:46 AM |
#147 |
| -
says the man who gave us 8 years of bush..... |
bowens43 |
Nov-03-10 04:54 AM |
#160 |
| -
Rec'd n/t |
Catherina |
Nov-03-10 05:20 AM |
#161 |
| -
Ralph is correct. |
Le Taz Hot |
Nov-03-10 05:45 AM |
#170 |
| -
Nader RAN AGAINST GORE. This is DU. We here do NOT have to speak or think favorably of him. |
WinkyDink |
Nov-03-10 06:23 AM |
#176 |
| -
You might consider listening to honest and accurate analysis wherever you find it |
depakid |
Nov-03-10 07:00 AM |
#185 |
| -
Oh, nice condescension. |
WinkyDink |
Nov-03-10 07:50 AM |
#195 |
| -
And we call the T-baggers "ignorant" ... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:11 PM |
#278 |
| -
I had serious issues with .. |
The Uncola |
Nov-03-10 06:25 AM |
#177 |
| -
Fuck you, Nader. |
Zoeisright |
Nov-03-10 07:13 AM |
#189 |
| -
From the guy who made George W. Bush possible . . . |
h9socialist |
Nov-03-10 07:47 AM |
#193 |
| -
All of these negative comments about Nader... |
dotymed |
Nov-03-10 07:56 AM |
#196 |
| -
Agree ... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:13 PM |
#279 |
| -
There are two ways to view the quotes in the OP: |
Nihil |
Nov-03-10 08:02 AM |
#197 |
| -
Nader's analysis is correct. |
MilesColtrane |
Nov-03-10 11:43 AM |
#254 |
| -
For the same reason DLC/New Dems scapegoated Nader for 2000 .... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:15 PM |
#280 |
| -
STFU. And thanks for Bush. nt |
onehandle |
Nov-03-10 08:16 AM |
#200 |
| -
K&R'd |
snot |
Nov-03-10 08:20 AM |
#201 |
| -
Gee, Ralph. Why don't you run as a Democrat somewhere? |
mistertrickster |
Nov-03-10 08:30 AM |
#203 |
| -
this thread exhibits part of the problem in this Party |
fascisthunter |
Nov-03-10 08:44 AM |
#210 |
| -
+1000% -- |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:16 PM |
#281 |
| -
Ralph is correct |
M_A |
Nov-03-10 08:49 AM |
#212 |
| -
+1000 |
pberq |
Nov-03-10 09:43 AM |
#226 |
| -
Prosecution of war criminals |
Jennifer Stream |
Nov-03-10 09:21 AM |
#219 |
| -
Agree -- and a serious failure .... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:17 PM |
#282 |
| -
Sickening, sickening the Nader haters. So misled for so long. |
The Stranger |
Nov-03-10 09:39 AM |
#225 |
| -
They attack Nader even though he's the only one who is a real high profile progressive. |
AnArmyVeteran |
Nov-03-10 10:26 AM |
#229 |
| -
I'd like him to join my Party. |
WinkyDink |
Nov-03-10 10:32 AM |
#231 |
| -
But then he would have to sell out his values. |
AnArmyVeteran |
Nov-03-10 10:48 AM |
#234 |
| -
And that's a reflection of how bad our party has become more than it is a reflection on Nader. nt |
Selatius |
Nov-03-10 11:22 AM |
#243 |
| -
I absolutely agree. |
AnArmyVeteran |
Nov-03-10 11:27 AM |
#244 |
| -
Has Kucinich? |
WinkyDink |
Nov-03-10 11:54 AM |
#263 |
| -
Yes -- we all understand that -- in order to exist as a Democrat Kucinich cannot |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:22 PM |
#285 |
| -
+1000% |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:21 PM |
#284 |
| -
Do you realize you're in a party which is pro-corporate? And moving more to the right? |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:20 PM |
#283 |
| -
Thank you. Agree 100% |
jeffrey_X |
Nov-03-10 02:38 PM |
#321 |
| -
Did Nader do much to prevent this??? Does he live in a cave except during November of election yrs? |
BrklynLiberal |
Nov-03-10 10:43 AM |
#233 |
| -
Obviously, your comments are based on very little knowledge of Nader .... |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:26 PM |
#287 |
| -
You want to make the argument that Nader fights against fascism? |
suzie |
Nov-03-10 02:33 PM |
#318 |
| -
... |
BrklynLiberal |
Nov-04-10 08:03 AM |
#346 |
| -
Nailed It! |
bvar22 |
Nov-03-10 10:49 AM |
#235 |
| -
Well, ain't Ralphie a little genius and all. |
Owl |
Nov-03-10 11:35 AM |
#247 |
| -
Nader's message is right, even if I have little love for the messenger. |
Laelth |
Nov-03-10 12:06 PM |
#272 |
| -
Nader has for decades fought corporatism/fascism ... why would you |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:28 PM |
#288 |
| -
Thanks for posting!!! Nice analysis. |
rainy |
Nov-03-10 12:23 PM |
#286 |
| -
Thanks for posting this -- I didn't get to tune in yesterday ... wish I had -- !! |
defendandprotect |
Nov-03-10 12:28 PM |
#289 |
| -
Ralph is exactly correct. |
Enthusiast |
Nov-03-10 12:32 PM |
#290 |
| -
Rec. Not exactly crazy talk. nt |
Smarmie Doofus |
Nov-03-10 12:32 PM |
#291 |
| -
Rec. Not exactly crazy talk. nt |
Smarmie Doofus |
Nov-03-10 12:32 PM |
#292 |
| -
Discussion in this thread should be about what Ralph said, not about |
Bryn |
Nov-03-10 01:10 PM |
#303 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-03-10 01:12 PM |
#304 |
| -
I don't like people quoting Nader on almost anything. |
Stuart G |
Nov-03-10 01:19 PM |
#307 |
| -
Kick +10,000 |
ProudDad |
Nov-03-10 01:23 PM |
#309 |
| -
Funny to see party hacks now admitting Ralph was right ... |
upi402 |
Nov-03-10 02:37 PM |
#319 |
| -
Ralph Nader is Spot-On!!!!!! |
WizardLeft62 |
Nov-06-10 12:38 AM |
#351 |
| -
And yes, Very Craven and Evil GOP Batards |
WizardLeft62 |
Nov-08-10 04:12 AM |
#353 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore