You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #56: i read it when it was first posted. guess i'm challenged. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-10 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. i read it when it was first posted. guess i'm challenged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -MSNBC's Shame: Keith Olbermann xocet  Nov-01-10 07:55 PM   #0 
  - Good-bye  Doctor_J   Nov-01-10 07:55 PM   #1 
  - I unrecced, but then I began to suspect that Poe's Law had come into play.  JVS   Nov-01-10 07:56 PM   #2 
  - Poe's Law or not, it's inappropriate, especially with that link. n/t  qnr   Nov-01-10 08:01 PM   #13 
  - Rii-ight..  Skidmore   Nov-01-10 07:57 PM   #3 
  - Is it already Nov 2?  HipChick   Nov-01-10 07:58 PM   #6 
     - LOL that was my first thought.  laundry_queen   Nov-01-10 08:31 PM   #52 
  - Liberal Extremist?! Keith? Hell No... Now my wife... Hell Yeah!  redirish28   Nov-01-10 07:57 PM   #4 
  - GOPers = Eternal Cynical Drama Mongers...always with Drama and Trouble...Never Positive  opihimoimoi   Nov-01-10 07:58 PM   #5 
  - i hit the button!  spanone   Nov-01-10 07:58 PM   #7 
  - what kind of pizza do you like?  madrchsod   Nov-01-10 07:59 PM   #8 
  - LOL  polichick   Nov-01-10 07:59 PM   #9 
  - I don't click mysterious blue links - so if you're trying to  myrna minx   Nov-01-10 07:59 PM   #10 
  - The Fuck?  liberalmuse   Nov-01-10 08:00 PM   #11 
  - This is why we have the sarcasm smiley  JVS   Nov-01-10 08:00 PM   # 
  - To save the DUers that don't read all that thoroughly from being embarrassed  thunder rising   Nov-01-10 08:16 PM   #37 
     - Ding, ding, ding, ding!!  kath   Nov-01-10 08:19 PM   #44 
  - This is why we have the sarcasm smiley  JVS   Nov-01-10 08:00 PM   #12 
  - Like this one?  liberalmuse   Nov-01-10 08:04 PM   #20 
  - there's a turd in the punchbowl  spanone   Nov-01-10 08:01 PM   #14 
  - I see it too, but I'm not going in after it. This one looks like a real oozer.  LibraLiz1973   Nov-01-10 09:39 PM   #63 
  - Actually, its fruit in the punchbowl. You just didn't look close enough.  cleanhippie   Nov-02-10 11:10 AM   #78 
  - Link goes to Republican Party - alert on this, please.  Pathwalker   Nov-01-10 08:01 PM   #15 
  - deleted  CommonSensePLZ   Nov-01-10 08:01 PM   #16 
  - Unrec (nt)  bigwillq   Nov-01-10 08:02 PM   #17 
  - I've never done this before, but you are an idiot.  pacalo   Nov-01-10 08:03 PM   #18 
  - You have to be kidding ....  tabatha   Nov-01-10 08:04 PM   #19 
  - Nicely done!  arcane1   Nov-01-10 08:05 PM   #21 
  - Nicely done!  arcane1   Nov-01-10 08:05 PM   #22 
  - it went right over everybody's head so far!  jonnyblitz   Nov-01-10 08:06 PM   #23 
  - Whoa - this thread shows once again just how pitifully low the ability to read-for-comprehension is  kath   Nov-01-10 08:12 PM   #30 
  - This is really embarrassing. (I'm laughing) Not only do they not read the OP, they don't read the  thunder rising   Nov-01-10 08:23 PM   #47 
     - No shit, I wish I could re-rec!  arcane1   Nov-01-10 08:27 PM   #49 
  - Lately, one MUST use  SoCalDem   Nov-01-10 08:16 PM   #36 
  - well welcome and it is so nice to have a discussion with you  SargeUNN   Nov-01-10 08:07 PM   #24 
  - Surely you jest...  Deuce   Nov-01-10 08:07 PM   #25 
  - Com'on, this OP drips with sarcasm ... and it's pretty good too. "impeccable intellectual honesty  thunder rising   Nov-01-10 08:09 PM   #26 
  - It's even more sarcastically fun if you imagine Keith's voice as you read  arcane1   Nov-01-10 08:13 PM   #32 
  - I'm going to insist on an actual smilie for this one.  Canuckistanian   Nov-01-10 08:16 PM   #35 
  - Hard to tell considering how smug and proud conservatives tend to be  CommonSensePLZ   Nov-01-10 08:19 PM   #41 
  - I have problems believing that anybody who has racked up 379 posts  tularetom   Nov-01-10 08:10 PM   #27 
  - "constructed an awesome example of sarcasm" and it's obvious ... read it again.  thunder rising   Nov-01-10 08:11 PM   #29 
     - if 27 out of 29 don't get it, it's not too awesomely constructed.  spanone   Nov-01-10 08:14 PM   # 
        - or ...  thunder rising   Nov-01-10 08:17 PM   #39 
        - it fails.  spanone   Nov-01-10 08:19 PM   #42 
           - Or, a large majority of DUers didn't read the OP. Hey, I've been guilty of this too. Just not now.  thunder rising   Nov-01-10 08:29 PM   #50 
              - i read it when it was first posted. guess i'm challenged.  spanone   Nov-01-10 08:40 PM   #56 
        - Depends on the target.  Sonoman   Nov-01-10 08:31 PM   #53 
           - if only the comedian and the band get it, who cares? hence the edit from the op  spanone   Nov-01-10 08:41 PM   #57 
              - Yeah, that was good. nt  Sonoman   Nov-01-10 08:48 PM   #59 
  - Welcome to DU!!!  cliffordu   Nov-01-10 08:10 PM   #28 
  - Erm.... what?  Canuckistanian   Nov-01-10 08:13 PM   #31 
  - Folks, you need to reread the op, click the link and change your negative posts.  thunder rising   Nov-01-10 08:13 PM   #33 
  - Yep - the article at the link says "the Koch brothers are more American than Obama" - that was  kath   Nov-01-10 08:17 PM   #38 
     - and that is a "civilized, fact-based debate."? This is like you fell for an Onion OP.  thunder rising   Nov-01-10 08:20 PM   #45 
  - Exactly. No matter how logical or well-reasoned or polite one may be...  Tatiana   Nov-01-10 08:14 PM   #34 
  - Not quite sure what the intent of the OP is but the article linked to was about Rachel and  Erose999   Nov-01-10 08:19 PM   #40 
  - I fart in the general direction of the expressed sentiment  TheKentuckian   Nov-01-10 08:19 PM   #43 
  - Wow.  Lucian   Nov-01-10 08:21 PM   #46 
  - Um, you either forgot the "sarcasm" smilie, or meant this?  vixengrl   Nov-01-10 08:23 PM   #48 
  - Go back to Freeperville, troll.  Archae   Nov-01-10 08:30 PM   #51 
  - I'm an extremist -Keiths an entertaining moderate.  Scruffy1   Nov-01-10 08:38 PM   #54 
  - I love this thread.  mmonk   Nov-01-10 08:40 PM   #55 
  - EPIC DU FAIL  Hubert H. Hubert   Nov-01-10 08:47 PM   #58 
  - No shit. DU home of the sarcasm-impaired!  xultar   Nov-01-10 09:10 PM   #60 
  - Make it 3: No shit. DU home of the sarcasm-impaired!  thunder rising   Nov-01-10 09:30 PM   #61 
  - +10000 nt  Lost-in-FL   Nov-01-10 09:37 PM   #62 
  - Good job...sorry most didn't get it....but on election eve..most are on edge !  RagAss   Nov-01-10 09:40 PM   #64 
  - Civility DOES NOT WORK against lunatics and morons.  alarimer   Nov-01-10 09:42 PM   #65 
  - Piss off wanker...nt  and-justice-for-all   Nov-01-10 09:51 PM   #66 
  - Whatever  Raine   Nov-01-10 09:52 PM   #67 
  - EXCELLEN T post... satire is SO hard to do w/o going over the edge to just plain smartass snark...  MiddleFingerMom   Nov-01-10 10:08 PM   #68 
  - This thing has really been down-rec'd. Come on people,  HubertHeaver   Nov-01-10 10:26 PM   #69 
  - Yes, please rec!!!  arcane1   Nov-01-10 10:56 PM   #70 
  - F*CK!  DFab420   Nov-01-10 11:02 PM   #71 
  - Hahahaha "Another Maddow objective that failed was to rebunk..."  the redcoat   Nov-01-10 11:10 PM   #72 
  - well, I'll admit to not realizing it's satire, but I don't feel stupid about it  renate   Nov-02-10 12:06 AM   #73 
  - What the hell, I'm kicking  arcane1   Nov-02-10 10:41 AM   #74 
  - ROFL  kick-ass-bob   Nov-02-10 10:51 AM   #75 
  - You set the bait  Renew Deal   Nov-02-10 10:55 AM   #76 
  - Its a clever setup...run a title to provocate, then clean it up later  opihimoimoi   Nov-02-10 11:04 AM   #77 
  - I think the problem here is that the wingnuts have descended into self-parody.  Berry Cool   Nov-02-10 05:56 PM   #79 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC