WillyT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-30-10 02:28 PM
Response to Original message |
| -Ralph Nader: The Road to Corporate Serfdom |
Better Believe It |
Oct-30-10 11:24 AM |
#0 |
 -
This is rich coming from Nader. |
Lil Missy |
Oct-30-10 11:27 AM |
#1 |
 -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Oct-30-10 11:37 AM |
#2 |
| -
I fully understand the irony, but |
Jackpine Radical |
Oct-30-10 11:40 AM |
#4 |
| -
You question Nader's character???? He said the same thing in 2000, 2004 and 2008. |
Better Believe It |
Oct-30-10 12:09 PM |
#7 |
 -
I somewhat mis-expressed myself. |
Jackpine Radical |
Oct-30-10 02:45 PM |
#51 |
| -
Ironic because it wouldn't be this bad if not for him. |
Lil Missy |
Oct-30-10 12:56 PM |
#13 |
| -
He made the Democrats cave when the 2000 election was stolen? |
Karmadillo |
Oct-30-10 01:04 PM |
#17 |
| -
Ha! You like to make shit up? |
Lil Missy |
Oct-30-10 01:17 PM |
#25 |
| -
How did the Democrats respond when the 5 Supreme Court Justices committed their crime? |
Karmadillo |
Oct-30-10 01:19 PM |
#27 |
| -
What are you suggesting? They should overthrow the government? Overrule the Supreme Court? |
Lil Missy |
Oct-30-10 01:28 PM |
#31 |
| -
I asked you what did the Democrats do when the election was stolen. You didn't answer. Why? |
Karmadillo |
Oct-30-10 01:30 PM |
#34 |
| -
No you didn't. You asked "How did the Democrats respond when the 5 Supreme Court Justices committed |
Lil Missy |
Oct-30-10 01:48 PM |
#40 |
| -
Why so much trouble answering a simple question? What did the Democrats do |
Karmadillo |
Oct-30-10 02:30 PM |
#48 |
| -
That has nothing to do with Nader being an arrogant asshole, or |
Lil Missy |
Oct-30-10 03:25 PM |
#52 |
| -
I know many people who would have nOT VOTED if Nader hadn't run |
Lorien |
Oct-30-10 01:20 PM |
#29 |
| -
I know many people who would have voted for GORE if Nader hadn't run |
Lil Missy |
Oct-30-10 01:30 PM |
#33 |
| -
and many more who would have voted if Nader hadn't put up his "They're both the Same" trope |
Capn Sunshine |
Oct-30-10 05:20 PM |
#63 |
| -
He's been fighting against corporate rule since day one |
Lorien |
Oct-30-10 01:08 PM |
#19 |
| -
And thanks to Nader we now have corporate rule. |
Lil Missy |
Oct-30-10 01:13 PM |
#22 |
| -
You're as bad as Beck at re-writing history. The GOP stole the election Lil Missy . |
Lorien |
Oct-30-10 01:17 PM |
#24 |
| -
Talk about re-writing history. |
Lil Missy |
Oct-31-10 02:50 PM |
#85 |
| -
Nader has been a TRUE progressive all his life. |
AnArmyVeteran |
Oct-30-10 02:21 PM |
#43 |
| -
Nevertheless, the article is rich coming from Nader. |
Lil Missy |
Oct-30-10 03:27 PM |
#53 |
| -
Thank you, Lil Missy. You're exactly right. |
Zoeisright |
Oct-30-10 11:56 PM |
#76 |
| -
Excellent article. |
mzmolly |
Oct-30-10 11:37 AM |
#3 |
| -
False quote from Abraham Lincoln. |
SemiCharmedQuark |
Oct-30-10 11:43 AM |
#5 |
| -
Indeed. |
Robb |
Oct-30-10 12:16 PM |
#9 |
| -
"His lack of contrition, his greatest flaw" Huh? You want Nader to apologize for |
Better Believe It |
Oct-30-10 12:31 PM |
#11 |
| -
Quick! Breathe into a paper bag! |
Lil Missy |
Oct-30-10 01:08 PM |
#20 |
| -
Yes, yes. I also want him to apologize for inventing chocolate |
Robb |
Oct-30-10 02:25 PM |
#46 |
| -
I don't understand how anyone who condones the use of swiftboating type tactics |
Better Believe It |
Oct-30-10 03:36 PM |
#54 |
| -
OK. Good luck! |
Robb |
Oct-30-10 05:48 PM |
#69 |
| -
lolz |
JNelson6563 |
Oct-30-10 11:56 AM |
#6 |
| -
Enough bull shit. You're now on ignore. |
Better Believe It |
Oct-30-10 12:11 PM |
#8 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-30-10 12:19 PM |
#10 |
| -
Not the same. Saddam was not involved in 911. Nader WAS involved in election 2000, (and loss) |
Lil Missy |
Oct-30-10 01:03 PM |
#16 |
| -
If Gore had managed to win his own home state of Tennessee.. |
Fumesucker |
Oct-30-10 01:07 PM |
#18 |
| -
now you're changing the subject. |
Lil Missy |
Oct-30-10 01:19 PM |
#28 |
| -
I thought the subject was "reasons for Gore not being POTUS in 2001"? |
Fumesucker |
Oct-30-10 01:28 PM |
#32 |
| -
follow a thread much? |
Lil Missy |
Oct-30-10 01:34 PM |
#37 |
| -
I wasn't the one who brought up the 2000 election.. |
Fumesucker |
Oct-30-10 02:21 PM |
#44 |
| -
Yes, you are the one who brought up the 2000 election. |
Lil Missy |
Oct-31-10 02:55 PM |
#88 |
| -
I seem to remember some election shenanigans in Tenn in election 2000. |
SammyWinstonJack |
Oct-30-10 04:19 PM |
#59 |
| -
Did Gore contest the election in Tennessee in 2000? |
Fumesucker |
Oct-30-10 07:16 PM |
#70 |
| -
Do you know what a straw man is? |
Zoeisright |
Oct-30-10 11:56 PM |
#78 |
| -
That would be Ralph Nader. Right? |
Better Believe It |
Oct-31-10 09:16 AM |
#79 |
| -
Um, I was IN FLORIDA in 2000 and witnessed the THEFT first hand. Nader had ZIP |
Lorien |
Oct-30-10 01:14 PM |
#23 |
| -
And I have the same right to MY opinion. |
Lil Missy |
Oct-30-10 01:25 PM |
#30 |
| -
So you're claiming that Gore was somehow entitled to all of the votes that Nader won? |
Better Believe It |
Oct-30-10 04:25 PM |
#61 |
| -
I said: |
Lil Missy |
Oct-30-10 05:33 PM |
#64 |
| -
Except all opinions are NOT equal. |
superduperfarleft |
Oct-30-10 05:35 PM |
#65 |
| -
I'm simply not allowing others to change the subject on what I said. |
Lil Missy |
Oct-30-10 05:45 PM |
#68 |
| -
Well said, Lil Missy!...nt |
SidDithers |
Oct-31-10 10:47 AM |
#83 |
| -
Well said, Lorien! n/t |
KoKo |
Oct-31-10 10:37 AM |
#82 |
| -
Saddam was a Muslim, 911 hijackers were Muslim... |
Jack Bone |
Oct-30-10 01:48 PM |
#39 |
| -
Gore's campaign organizers were determined to defeat Ralph Nader and they did! |
Better Believe It |
Oct-30-10 04:08 PM |
#56 |
| -
Nader wasn't the same force in 2008 as he was in 2000, and Obama had the benefit of running after |
Uncle Joe |
Oct-31-10 04:35 PM |
#93 |
| -
The Nader ticket was a stronger force in 2008 than in 2004 but Obama and his sharp |
Better Believe It |
Oct-31-10 07:06 PM |
#94 |
| -
Yep. And they're the same people who demand that we here in Florida vote for Meek |
Lorien |
Oct-30-10 01:11 PM |
#21 |
| -
*gasp* *gulp* |
JNelson6563 |
Oct-30-10 12:58 PM |
#14 |
| -
Ralph Nader: automatic unrecommend n/t |
LoZoccolo |
Oct-30-10 12:34 PM |
#12 |
| -
Wow, an ad hominem argument.. |
Fumesucker |
Oct-30-10 01:00 PM |
#15 |
| -
I think you would unrecommend if a post was quoting George Bush |
BzaDem |
Oct-30-10 02:23 PM |
#45 |
| -
Nader didn't enable Bush nearly as much as Gore did.. |
Fumesucker |
Oct-30-10 03:48 PM |
#55 |
| -
Yes, but both Gore and Kerry did defeat Nader! |
Better Believe It |
Oct-30-10 04:12 PM |
#57 |
| -
If Nader didn't run, Gore would have won. That's all there is to it. n/t |
BzaDem |
Oct-30-10 08:56 PM |
#74 |
| -
That's of course not necesarily so- but some people will- just like the MSM, repeat conjecture |
depakid |
Oct-31-10 09:21 AM |
#80 |
| -
"The real problem is that our system LETS people vote for 3rd party candidates" Your words. |
Better Believe It |
Oct-31-10 01:59 PM |
#84 |
| -
Ralph's message makes damn good sense... |
maryf |
Oct-30-10 01:19 PM |
#26 |
| -
The corporatocracy also got the anti-corporate crusader to take the blame... |
shockra |
Oct-30-10 01:32 PM |
#35 |
| -
Yes. Priding ourselves on our *real* anti-corporate stances... |
Orsino |
Oct-30-10 02:37 PM |
#49 |
| -
As usual, the message is ignored while the usual suspects attack the messanger |
Lorien |
Oct-30-10 01:32 PM |
#36 |
| -
+1,000 |
LWolf |
Oct-30-10 01:37 PM |
#38 |
| -
+1000 again |
Starry Messenger |
Oct-30-10 01:55 PM |
#41 |
| -
+10,000 |
depakid |
Oct-30-10 07:27 PM |
#72 |
| -
I agree with you on this one-Ralph was right. |
Scruffy1 |
Oct-31-10 04:08 PM |
#92 |
| -
But, the corporations still allow us to vote for their lackeys in both parties. |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Oct-30-10 01:56 PM |
#42 |
| -
K & R !!! |
WillyT |
Oct-30-10 02:28 PM |
#47 |
| -
Great words from great people...too bad we did not heed them. |
roamer65 |
Oct-30-10 02:44 PM |
#50 |
| -
K&R |
leftstreet |
Oct-30-10 04:13 PM |
#58 |
| -
Big K&R from a disgruntled serf (n/t) |
CrawlingChaos |
Oct-30-10 04:21 PM |
#60 |
| -
Despite his anti-corporate stance, make no mistake about it, Nader wants to destroy... |
MilesColtrane |
Oct-30-10 05:15 PM |
#62 |
| -
Nope also less racist and more sane. |
TheKentuckian |
Oct-30-10 05:44 PM |
#67 |
| -
You accept Nader's comment as one of the differences while admitting there are others. |
Better Believe It |
Oct-30-10 09:30 PM |
#75 |
| -
Automatic K&R for Nader. |
superduperfarleft |
Oct-30-10 05:36 PM |
#66 |
| -
Amazing that people can be so blind to such a simple and compelling message |
depakid |
Oct-30-10 07:26 PM |
#71 |
| -
they see Nader and their brains shut down |
ibegurpard |
Oct-30-10 11:56 PM |
#77 |
| -
A similar article, but with more depth and context... |
OlympicBrian |
Oct-30-10 08:36 PM |
#73 |
| -
He has nailed the situation the US finds itself in. |
mmonk |
Oct-31-10 09:57 AM |
#81 |
| -
Yeah yeah yeah, Nader. I'll support you once you get in line |
Taverner |
Oct-31-10 02:51 PM |
#86 |
| -
if Nader could put his ego aside, he would use a pen-name |
hfojvt |
Oct-31-10 02:55 PM |
#87 |
| -
So you're a shrink trying to analyze Nader? Perhaps you can provide us a professional analysis of |
Better Believe It |
Oct-31-10 03:02 PM |
#89 |
| -
I made a fairly simple claim |
hfojvt |
Oct-31-10 03:23 PM |
#91 |
| -
A claim lacking substance. Nader's name and credentials make his messages stronger. |
Better Believe It |
Oct-31-10 07:23 PM |
#95 |
| -
Exactly. |
Lil Missy |
Oct-31-10 03:09 PM |
#90 |
| -
Is the fine art of character assassination your main or only area of expertise? |
Better Believe It |
Oct-31-10 07:25 PM |
#96 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
