You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DUers no longer have the right to demand party loyalty. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 11:32 PM
Original message
DUers no longer have the right to demand party loyalty.
Advertisements [?]
Not after demanding Meek drop out of the FL senate race to increase support for Crist. Endorsing and pushing a recent former Republican over the Dem (who is losing in part *because* FL Democrats refuse to support him, thus ensuring an "unelectable" feedback loop) and then demanding party loyalty is the height of hypocrisy.

You want to waste your vote hoping Crist won't turn his back on you once in office? That's your right. But I don't ever, EVER want to hear another demand that the Dem be supported without question. DUers have lost that right, thanks to DU's decision to break their own rule against advocating for third-party candidates over the Dem. Any argument predicated on a call for loyalty is already lost due to this blatant double standard, which shows what a profoundly damaging decision this was.

Again -- vote as you wish. You want to fuck over my home state by turning your back on the Dem to support a guy who might very well laugh at you and run to the Republicans after the election? Your call. But don't expect not to be laughed at for demanding party loyalty.

By showing your own disloyalty, you've made your argument a joke.

And the second a viable Green comes up against a weak Dem, this Crist business WILL be remembered by many here. And per DU's own stance, advocating for that Green should be expected to be permissible -- unless, of course, DU wants to foster a reputation for hypocrisy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC