You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #16: Lol the person that you replied to obviously didn't understand what he was posting [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-10 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Lol the person that you replied to obviously didn't understand what he was posting

"well reasoned appellate decision".


So it appears you were the quick one to "grab anything that looks as if it might help"

Here again is the link to the LGBT Bar Association's first and highest award winner and a leading legal authority that publishes on LGBT issues in peer review publications' post yesterday indicating that she does not agree with those that "(castigate) the Obama administration for defending the constitutionality of these statutes".

In charachterizing those that understand why DoJ has to appeal you are putting Professor Hunter in the same category.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Nan Hunter, first recepient of National LGBT Bar's highest honor defends appeal by DoJ grantcart  Oct-13-10 06:42 PM   #0 
  - Nah, she's just a homophobe in disguise, I'm sure.  MineralMan   Oct-13-10 06:47 PM   #1 
  - " would be an extraordinary act for them to do." That's what we fucking elected him for.  GodlessBiker   Oct-13-10 06:50 PM   #2 
  - "extraordinary acts" in the legal system are easily undone.  grantcart   Oct-13-10 06:56 PM   #3 
  - Extraordinary acts are just that. Of course, they can be reversed. That's a reason not to be ...  GodlessBiker   Oct-13-10 07:03 PM   #5 
     - So are you agreeing also with some posters who are putting forth  grantcart   Oct-13-10 07:16 PM   #11 
        - A peer reviewed article? The decision was made yesterday.  GodlessBiker   Oct-13-10 07:23 PM   #15 
  - Bottom line, even if Obama chooses to play some N-dimensional chess game in the courts,  metapunditedgy   Oct-13-10 07:24 PM   #17 
     - He's said it already... not in those words of course...  JuniperLea   Oct-13-10 07:36 PM   #20 
        - Statements like this?  metapunditedgy   Oct-13-10 07:59 PM   #22 
  - 'Extraordinary' in 2010 - almost 2011?  xchrom   Oct-13-10 06:56 PM   #4 
  - The question has to do with DoJ not appealing a constitutional question  grantcart   Oct-13-10 07:05 PM   #6 
  - Seems to me if there's to be a permanent change...  JuniperLea   Oct-13-10 07:05 PM   #7 
  - So, you are willing to risk sacrificing the win of the plaintiffs in the DOMA case...  GodlessBiker   Oct-13-10 07:13 PM   #8 
  - Do you read your own links?  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 07:13 PM   #9 
  - No. It's just quick window dressing- grab anything that looks as if it might help n/t  Catherina   Oct-13-10 07:15 PM   #10 
  - What a waste of time. n/t  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 07:20 PM   #13 
  - Lol the person that you replied to obviously didn't understand what he was posting  grantcart   Oct-13-10 07:24 PM   #16 
     - The problem here is that the appellate court will have to agree with the 9th Circuit.  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 07:48 PM   #21 
  - well to being with the District decision is not an appellate decision  grantcart   Oct-13-10 07:18 PM   #12 
  - "while simultaneously contributing real muscle to a repeal effort "  kevinbgoode   Oct-13-10 07:22 PM   #14 
  - Just to be clear that you are in support of the DoJ appeal?  grantcart   Oct-13-10 07:25 PM   #18 
  - She's a fraud. Because an internet forum told me that all Obama has to do is...  Tarheel_Dem   Oct-13-10 07:26 PM   #19 
  - People want this stuff to be simple and it's just not  treestar   Oct-13-10 08:04 PM   #23 
  - Thanks.  Scurrilous   Oct-13-10 09:12 PM   #24 
  - Interesting!  Number23   Oct-14-10 12:16 AM   #25 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC