You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #31: Congress would have to "reinstate" another law. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-13-10 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. Congress would have to "reinstate" another law.
No solution is ever truly permanent, but I'd prefer it be repealed. Do you trust the Supreme Court to overturn this law? I don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -White House: 'Don't ask' will end soon cal04  Oct-13-10 12:38 PM   #0 
  - Define "soon."  aquart   Oct-13-10 12:41 PM   #1 
  - 24 Business Hours?  cherokeeprogressive   Oct-14-10 03:48 AM   #106 
  - Changing the law, through an act of Congress, is the gold standard.  Skinner   Oct-13-10 12:44 PM   #2 
  - On what basis do you actually believe that?  katandmoon   Oct-13-10 12:46 PM   #4 
  - Because President Obama, and everyone else in his administration, have said repeatedly...  Skinner   Oct-13-10 12:55 PM   #10 
  - I respectfully disagree. Obama and his administration could barely care less about LGBT issues  LonePirate   Oct-13-10 01:33 PM   #26 
  - The fact is any other avenue can be challenged.  grantcart   Oct-13-10 02:10 PM   #55 
  - No, actually the "gold standard" would be --  Hell Hath No Fury   Oct-13-10 12:53 PM   #8 
  - But then there's no signing ceremony. n/t  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 01:00 PM   #13 
  - So, now the President is at fault...  Skinner   Oct-13-10 01:03 PM   #16 
     - Well, he likely does want in on this before the election as you said up thread.  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 01:07 PM   #18 
     - Where did he say that?  Renew Deal   Oct-13-10 01:45 PM   #34 
        - Skinner pointed out that Obama probably wants a win in glbt issues  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 01:53 PM   #37 
        - That's the 2012 election.  Renew Deal   Oct-13-10 01:58 PM   #41 
           - Yes, that is the 2012 election. There was no misunderstanding  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 02:01 PM   #43 
        - Reply to #10.  laughingliberal   Oct-13-10 06:07 PM   #98 
     - The point is that Obama is doing nothing to end DADT  Renew Deal   Oct-13-10 01:44 PM   #33 
        - You're a very bad mind reader.  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 01:58 PM   #40 
           - It's not just you  Renew Deal   Oct-13-10 02:00 PM   #42 
              - It isn't "just me", it isn't me at all, thanks. n/t  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 02:03 PM   #47 
  - I disagree.  Skinner   Oct-13-10 01:02 PM   #15 
  - So this appeal will eventually make the difference between DADT being dead  rocktivity   Oct-13-10 07:20 PM   #101 
  - You described perfectly the part I'm not getting here  tavalon   Oct-14-10 04:54 AM   #109 
  - Congress would have to "reinstate" another law.  Renew Deal   Oct-13-10 01:38 PM   #31 
  - I certainly don't think the current SCOTUS would overturn it.  MineralMan   Oct-13-10 03:52 PM   #88 
  - Which is exactly what Obama is getting done n/t  sandnsea   Oct-13-10 08:28 PM   #104 
  - So the DOJ is fighting for DADT  tavalon   Oct-14-10 03:51 AM   #107 
  - If the President declines to appeal Judge Phillips' ruling  ruggerson   Oct-13-10 12:56 PM   #11 
  - Not quite the same.  Skinner   Oct-13-10 01:08 PM   #19 
     - My understanding  ruggerson   Oct-13-10 01:18 PM   #21 
        - It is dead, yes.  Skinner   Oct-13-10 01:30 PM   #24 
        - Also not a scholar but a decision by a single Federal Judge could be undone  grantcart   Oct-13-10 02:16 PM   #60 
        - Not true  grantcart   Oct-13-10 02:14 PM   #57 
        - But who would have standing to appeal?  ruggerson   Oct-13-10 05:13 PM   #97 
        - This article, originally posted at Daily Kos explains why it is important to  grantcart   Oct-13-10 04:57 PM   #96 
  - TY Skinner, for your contributions to this discussion. Hope to see more of you ongoingly.  Hekate   Oct-13-10 04:21 PM   #95 
  - Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure it will.  katandmoon   Oct-13-10 12:45 PM   #3 
  - It's official...  disillusioned73   Oct-13-10 12:47 PM   #5 
  - Just end the damned policy, Mr. President  kevinbgoode   Oct-13-10 12:48 PM   #6 
  - "Get rid of the policy NOW."  Dawgs   Oct-13-10 01:09 PM   #20 
  - the "law" has been struck down as unconstitutional  ruggerson   Oct-13-10 01:26 PM   #22 
  - But why, when lofty words will suffice for so many fools?  closeupready   Oct-13-10 01:36 PM   #30 
  - But this sort of not doing anything and just waiting to see how the process  tavalon   Oct-14-10 05:01 AM   #110 
  - Wait... what???  arcane1   Oct-13-10 12:50 PM   #7 
  - Did they say whether they intend to help with that ?  kenny blankenship   Oct-13-10 12:55 PM   #9 
  - heh  BeFree   Oct-13-10 12:59 PM   #12 
  - Good news.  Scurrilous   Oct-13-10 01:01 PM   #14 
  - "News" is not the promise that something will happen, someday  theHandpuppet   Oct-13-10 01:05 PM   #17 
  - Gibbs says it is abou the 'process'  Bluenorthwest   Oct-13-10 01:28 PM   #23 
  - But only Congress can end DADT, right?  Zenlitened   Oct-13-10 01:31 PM   #25 
  - Great! After that happens, I can start giving the DNC money again.  closeupready   Oct-13-10 01:35 PM   #27 
  - "There'll be pie in the sky..when you die." Tom Hill  Tierra_y_Libertad   Oct-13-10 01:35 PM   #28 
  - Mr. President, DADT can end tomorrow if you would simply comply with the Federal Court decision  MadHound   Oct-13-10 01:36 PM   #29 
  - You really believe this is all about Obama taking credit?  Renew Deal   Oct-13-10 01:41 PM   #32 
  - He does not deserve any credit but I believe he wants to take some  LonePirate   Oct-13-10 01:53 PM   #35 
  - Who said this?  Renew Deal   Oct-13-10 01:56 PM   #38 
  - Yes, he desperately wants the credit,  MadHound   Oct-13-10 01:57 PM   #39 
     - "the dems"  Renew Deal   Oct-13-10 02:03 PM   #45 
     - So, don't appeal the ruling,  MadHound   Oct-13-10 02:07 PM   #49 
        - If some judge decides bias crime laws are unconstitutional....  Renew Deal   Oct-13-10 02:09 PM   #54 
           - Bias crime laws have already withstood court tests  MadHound   Oct-13-10 02:18 PM   #61 
              - So far  Renew Deal   Oct-13-10 02:21 PM   #63 
                 - Oh, really? Just how likely is it to be passed this year?  MadHound   Oct-13-10 02:27 PM   #67 
     - Obama cannot end DATA, DOMA or any other law just because  SeattleGirl   Oct-13-10 02:03 PM   #46 
        - But right now, Obama can end DADT,  MadHound   Oct-13-10 02:09 PM   #52 
        - Doesn't the DOJ have an obligation to defend the laws on  SeattleGirl   Oct-13-10 02:23 PM   #64 
        - Not any sort of legally binding or constitutional obligation, no  MadHound   Oct-13-10 02:28 PM   #68 
        - Let me see if I get what you are saying...  Spazito   Oct-13-10 02:29 PM   #69 
           - Wow, nice way to try to twist what I'm saying, and twist what the DOJ does  MadHound   Oct-13-10 02:34 PM   #75 
              - The AG and president are supposed to be separate  Renew Deal   Oct-13-10 02:39 PM   #80 
              - No, they're not,  MadHound   Oct-13-10 02:45 PM   #84 
              - Please provide the legal case where it states the President has the right....  Spazito   Oct-13-10 03:08 PM   #86 
              - Go read your history of the Kennedy's  MadHound   Oct-13-10 03:50 PM   #87 
                 - No actual provision proving the President has the right to dictate to the DOJ...  Spazito   Oct-13-10 04:02 PM   #93 
              - Answer the question; do you want Republicans to have the same powers?  treestar   Oct-13-10 03:59 PM   #91 
                 - It is in the Constitution,  MadHound   Oct-13-10 04:01 PM   #92 
        - Obama gets attention on this issue because he asked for attention.  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 02:12 PM   #56 
        - And if he does follow through, to not take credit.  Renew Deal   Oct-13-10 02:20 PM   #62 
        - What? That doesn't even make sense. n/t  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 02:24 PM   #65 
           - You want Obama to "follow through" on the repeal, but not to take any of the credit for ending DADT.  Renew Deal   Oct-13-10 02:31 PM   #71 
              - As I said, you are a very bad mind reader. n/t  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 02:32 PM   #73 
                 - Right  Renew Deal   Oct-13-10 02:37 PM   #78 
                    - Attacking intentions that you attribute to me is ridiculous but be my guest. n/t  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 02:39 PM   #79 
        - So, are you saying that attention is what he wants?  SeattleGirl   Oct-13-10 02:24 PM   #66 
           - The real point here is that he will be given ZERO credit for initiating this.  AtomicKitten   Oct-13-10 02:29 PM   #70 
           - Barney Frank is a known homophobe.  Renew Deal   Oct-13-10 02:32 PM   #72 
           - Apparently.  AtomicKitten   Oct-13-10 02:34 PM   #76 
           - People started working on the repeal of DADT the day it was signed.  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 02:36 PM   #77 
              - His pledge in the SOTU started the ball rolling in earnest.  AtomicKitten   Oct-13-10 02:43 PM   #82 
                 - Okay. n/t  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 02:47 PM   #85 
           - No. If I was saying that, I would have said that.  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 02:33 PM   #74 
        - Or the process sucks and takes a long time  treestar   Oct-13-10 03:58 PM   #90 
  - Still being ignorant, and refusing to get the fact  treestar   Oct-13-10 03:55 PM   #89 
     - No, the actual injunction is what can put an end to DADT  MadHound   Oct-14-10 07:15 AM   #113 
  - Golly, wonder what that process could be - "absent the Senate vote."  donco6   Oct-13-10 01:53 PM   #36 
  - What I don't understand is, why was Arnold able to refuse to defend H8  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 02:02 PM   #44 
     - This is why  Renew Deal   Oct-13-10 02:05 PM   #48 
     - The courts have already ruled this disgusting policy is unconstitutional.  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 02:08 PM   #51 
     - I guess our California Justice Dept and law are some magical --  Hell Hath No Fury   Oct-13-10 02:08 PM   #50 
     - Yes, isn't that interesting.  donco6   Oct-13-10 02:09 PM   #53 
        - There may be a reason. I just have never heard one. n/t  EFerrari   Oct-13-10 02:40 PM   #81 
  - Yeah Gibbo, lets end DADT in December... when we have a GOP Senate and probably a GOP House too. I'm  Erose999   Oct-13-10 02:15 PM   #58 
  - There will not be a GOP House and Senate in December.  Renew Deal   Oct-13-10 02:16 PM   #59 
     - Well I guess they'll be officially sworn in in January. But you get my point. They need to act on  Erose999   Oct-14-10 07:12 AM   #112 
  - I love the passive voice  Prism   Oct-13-10 02:44 PM   #83 
  - No credit to the White House on this one. They're not leading at all  Catherina   Oct-13-10 04:09 PM   #94 
  - +1,000.  BlueIris   Oct-13-10 06:45 PM   #99 
  - Remember: 75% of the BP oil spill is now gone from the Gulf, largely thanks to  metapunditedgy   Oct-13-10 07:07 PM   #100 
  - This isn't my chosen approach --I feel no need or desire to defend it  CreekDog   Oct-13-10 07:39 PM   #102 
  - This was informative.  Radical Activist   Oct-13-10 08:05 PM   #103 
  - I'm still not getting it  tavalon   Oct-14-10 05:05 AM   #111 
  - Okay, let me see if I've got this straight  tavalon   Oct-14-10 03:44 AM   #105 
  - LOLOL "This a policy that is going to end"  cherokeeprogressive   Oct-14-10 04:04 AM   #108 
  - Looks like walking down the up escalator  CreekDog   Oct-14-10 04:31 PM   #114 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC