You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

110th Congress is lame. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Jack Sprat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 05:15 PM
Original message
110th Congress is lame.
Advertisements [?]
It appeared to begin posturing itself from the outset for the 08 election. It was soon apparent that no serious challenge of the Bush/Cheney Iraq occupation was forthcoming. The latest compromise confirms that fact.

Then, the compromise trade bill confirms that no serious challenge is forthcoming to alter the out-sourcing of American jobs.

The one hope of promise for the 110th was the Investigations of this corrupt collusion of Executive and Judicial Branches of government to flagrantly violate the law by illegal wire-tapping of citizens without Court warrants and without approval of the Attorney General; Plus, the flagrant dismissal of US attorneys who refused to participate in voter suppression before a national election. Yet, despite testimony from an ex-Asst Atty Gen, the acting Attorney General is able to appear before Congress and repeat "I don't remember" 100 times and remain right on the job.

No doubt, Bush and Rove are toasting their "punking of the 110th Congress", and laughing themselves to tears that any of us peons thought that we could derail their rights of sovereign regency.

It is little wonder that many people have lost hope. We don't elect representatives. We elect millionaires, who are indebted to lobbyists of all stripes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -110th Congress is lame. Jack Sprat  May-18-07 05:15 PM   #0 
  - Wow. You missed out on some good stuff they did. nt  MookieWilson   May-18-07 05:17 PM   #1 
  - Yes, they passed minimum wage legislation.  Jack Sprat   May-18-07 05:24 PM   #8 
     - Did I miss it?  Telly Savalas   May-18-07 07:42 PM   #18 
     - Nope. No minimum wage increase yet. After all, they got the publicity. Screw the workers.  TahitiNut   May-18-07 11:48 PM   #22 
        - You're asking the wrong people for progressive legislation.  liberaldemocrat7   May-19-07 12:03 PM   #32 
     - The powers of Congress are limited on foreign policy. Sad, but true. nt  MookieWilson   May-18-07 08:38 PM   #19 
  - would you prefer a Congress that does that AND tries to push anti-gay marriage amendments?  ComerPerro   May-18-07 05:17 PM   #2 
  - No  Jack Sprat   May-18-07 05:27 PM   #12 
  - Ah yes, the "we suck less" argument. Anything to maintain the illusion of choice. n/t  greyhound1966   May-19-07 12:58 AM   #23 
     - You honestly can't see any difference between this Congress and the one of the last few years?  ComerPerro   May-19-07 01:25 AM   #25 
        - I never said there was no difference, only that they are largely cosmetic.  greyhound1966   May-19-07 02:37 PM   #34 
        - That's right, I forgot. We elected them to a very slim majority so they could wave their magic wands  ComerPerro   May-19-07 05:09 PM   #36 
           - Over 60 years we have seen overwhelming majorities, total reverses, split houses,  greyhound1966   May-19-07 07:01 PM   #37 
        - Yes, there is a tiny difference.  Usrename   May-19-07 05:00 PM   #35 
  - Not sure about the rest of your post, but I'll agree with this statement that you made:  Redstone   May-18-07 05:19 PM   #3 
  - Good point, Redstone.  bigwillq   May-18-07 05:55 PM   #14 
  - B I N G O  rsmith6621   May-18-07 05:19 PM   #4 
  - What are you talking about?  blogslut   May-18-07 05:21 PM   #5 
  - Here is what I'm talking about.  Jack Sprat   May-18-07 05:34 PM   #13 
  - That's him, not them.  rucky   May-19-07 11:01 AM   #30 
  - Hearings and investigations are what many brought in by this  mmonk   May-18-07 07:24 PM   #17 
  - While I agree that we get to chose among millionaires  sfexpat2000   May-18-07 05:22 PM   #6 
  - Well, I'll just vote republican next time.  HypnoToad   May-18-07 05:24 PM   #7 
  - not as lame as the 109th or 8th and at least part of the 7th..  bullimiami   May-18-07 05:25 PM   #9 
  - That is true. Maybe the Dems are waiting for a 2008 victory.  HypnoToad   May-18-07 05:26 PM   #10 
  - sure, I will agree with that. (shrug)  Jack Sprat   May-18-07 05:27 PM   #11 
  - Their approval rating confirms that fact  notsodumbhillbilly   May-18-07 06:11 PM   #15 
  - They are failing- they wanted control and with that came deep  deacon   May-18-07 06:54 PM   #16 
  - Teeny tiny slim DEM majority hasn't fixed what the GOP took decades to fuck up yet...  havocmom   May-18-07 11:37 PM   #20 
  - No, in a Burger King  otherlander   May-18-07 11:43 PM   #21 
  - Excuse me but you should look back at just who controlled congress  greyhound1966   May-19-07 01:04 AM   #24 
  - I'm with you. I believe the hearings are just a smoke screen to have  Faux pas   May-19-07 03:59 AM   #26 
  - So I Guess You Miss The 109th Congress???  KharmaTrain   May-19-07 04:55 AM   #27 
  - the goops  YEBBA   May-19-07 10:21 AM   #29 
  - Yikes  koopie57   May-19-07 07:34 AM   #28 
  - To all those who approve of the job performance of the democratically controlled 110th congress,  Larry Ogg   May-19-07 11:58 AM   #31 
  - They Laugh At The Oldest GOP Joke In DC  Senator   May-19-07 12:13 PM   #33 
  - I feel dirty for even mentioning his name, but concealed by all of the insane babble  greyhound1966   May-20-07 01:20 PM   #38 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC