You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: Well, alright. I considered being more specific but didn't want [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
coti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-06-10 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Well, alright. I considered being more specific but didn't want
to be too negative about the speech.

Give me a few minutes to go over it and I'll reply with another post.

There's PLENTY in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Obama's taking a strong stand against privatizing Social Security! coti  Sep-06-10 08:20 PM   #0 
  - There's no plan to privatize it..  sendero   Sep-06-10 08:23 PM   #1 
  - Right.  coti   Sep-06-10 08:28 PM   #3 
  - Yeah, they won't privatize it. Just gut it. nt  Bluebear   Sep-06-10 08:24 PM   #2 
  - You're going to have a credibility problem if you don't document or retract  LoZoccolo   Sep-06-10 08:29 PM   #4 
  - Well, alright. I considered being more specific but didn't want  coti   Sep-06-10 08:31 PM   #6 
  - Going off of the transcript here:  coti   Sep-06-10 09:07 PM   #9 
  - Looking at each one of those..  USArmyParatrooper   Sep-06-10 09:33 PM   #13 
  - Obama appointed the damned commission that will be recommending cuts.  coti   Sep-06-10 09:44 PM   #15 
  - Actually, YOU are being disingenuous  USArmyParatrooper   Sep-06-10 09:55 PM   #17 
  - WHEN Congress passes the cuts recommended by the commission  coti   Sep-06-10 10:04 PM   #19 
  - Ah, yes! Conjecture = Fact in your world  USArmyParatrooper   Sep-06-10 10:13 PM   #21 
     - Just answer the question!  coti   Sep-06-10 10:23 PM   #23 
     - "The support he's shown for" is completely FALSE  USArmyParatrooper   Sep-06-10 11:22 PM   #32 
     - Okay, so he created this commission, and then appointed Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles  coti   Sep-06-10 11:45 PM   #38 
     - good job this Goldman Sachs admin is working backwards.  democracy1st   Sep-06-10 11:45 PM   #39 
     - It was once conjecture that we'd lose the public option.  GOTV   Sep-07-10 07:55 AM   #73 
  - He has gone out of his way to pledge no privatization. Why then--  eridani   Sep-07-10 01:48 AM   #69 
  - So who's your source on this? Glen Beck or the Daily Worker?  Capn Sunshine   Sep-07-10 12:04 AM   #50 
  - The article you quote was writtens month before the bill was passed ...  GOTV   Sep-07-10 07:53 AM   #72 
  - The transcripts from HuffPo & TPM are not accurate. I'm still waiting on an official transcript.  MrsCorleone   Sep-06-10 10:40 PM   #26 
  - He is citing this OP as his citation at another thread where we asked for proof.  Tx4obama   Sep-06-10 11:44 PM   #37 
     - Actually, I cited post #9 for you. Would you care to respond?  coti   Sep-06-10 11:56 PM   #45 
  - Obama isn't the one with credibility problems.  KittyWampus   Sep-06-10 08:31 PM   #5 
  - Well, if he wasn't, you'd think more people would believe him. nt  coti   Sep-06-10 09:10 PM   #10 
  - Get rid of Alan Simpson  Raine   Sep-06-10 08:32 PM   #7 
  - 'Sweet, though no one except for him is talking about that.'  chill_wind   Sep-06-10 08:43 PM   #8 
  - My favorite strawman argument that politicians make  Yupster   Sep-06-10 10:53 PM   #29 
  - Unrec for 'half-truths and misdirection'.  jaxx   Sep-06-10 09:20 PM   #11 
  - What supposition? Is he not planning to cut Social Security and/or raise the  coti   Sep-06-10 09:23 PM   #12 
     - All supposition.  jaxx   Sep-06-10 09:33 PM   #14 
        - Is he not planning on cutting and/or raising the retirement age for Social Security? nt  coti   Sep-06-10 09:45 PM   #16 
           - Are rumors facts?  jaxx   Sep-06-10 09:57 PM   #18 
           - Answer the question. nt  coti   Sep-06-10 10:05 PM   #20 
              - You get one response for your dictatorial demand of "answer the question".  jaxx   Sep-06-10 10:32 PM   #25 
                 - You said ALL of my OP statements were supposition, and I expect you to back that up.  coti   Sep-06-10 10:42 PM   #27 
                    - LOL now you've got the supposed recommendations as "fact"  jaxx   Sep-06-10 10:53 PM   #30 
                       - Will he veto them or sign them? nt  coti   Sep-06-10 10:55 PM   #31 
           - No, and you have yet to substantiate your claim.  USArmyParatrooper   Sep-06-10 10:15 PM   #22 
           - So, you're saying he'll veto the cuts recommended by his own commission? nt  coti   Sep-06-10 10:26 PM   #24 
              - I'm saying a few things  USArmyParatrooper   Sep-06-10 11:26 PM   #33 
                 - What's their purpose?  coti   Sep-06-10 11:51 PM   #42 
           - NO. Obama is NOT not planning on cutting and/or raising the retirement age for Social Security. n/t  Tx4obama   Sep-06-10 11:55 PM   #44 
              - See post #38 above. nt  coti   Sep-06-10 11:57 PM   #46 
  - Actually, there were many DUer's swearing he was "privatizing"  johnaries   Sep-06-10 10:45 PM   #28 
  - What Obama said today....  Tx4obama   Sep-06-10 11:40 PM   #35 
  - Given who is on the commission, slashing will be the alternative to  eridani   Sep-07-10 02:13 AM   #70 
  - It is Republican John Boehner that wants to raise retirement age to 70, NOT Obama. n/t  Tx4obama   Sep-06-10 11:39 PM   #34 
  - Why'd you jump threads? The other one get too hot for ya?  Tx4obama   Sep-06-10 11:42 PM   #36 
  - Yeah, that must be it. Of course, sharper people will notice  coti   Sep-06-10 11:47 PM   #41 
  - "Sweet, though no one except for him is talking about that."  BzaDem   Sep-06-10 11:45 PM   #40 
  - No one who is taken seriously is talking about it. His commission isn't  coti   Sep-06-10 11:52 PM   #43 
  - He is campaigning against Republicans, most of whom want to privatize Social Security.  BzaDem   Sep-07-10 12:25 AM   #55 
     - Yes, and, even more commonly, they want to cut benefits and raise the retirement age!  coti   Sep-07-10 12:34 AM   #57 
     - He means ensuring that in 2037, when benefits are scheduled to be cut by 25%, they won't actually be  BzaDem   Sep-07-10 12:51 AM   #59 
        - How? By cutting benefits or raising the retirement age now? nt  coti   Sep-07-10 12:55 AM   #60 
           - I do not know what the commission would propose, or whether what they propose will be enacted.  BzaDem   Sep-07-10 01:00 AM   #61 
              - You're saying he can't raise the cap, so he'll have to cut benefits and/or raise  coti   Sep-07-10 01:02 AM   #62 
                 - No. I'm saying he can't raise the cap, so therefore benefits will be cut WITHOUT ANY FURTHER ACTION.  BzaDem   Sep-07-10 01:06 AM   #64 
                    - In 27 years. By the numbers showing now.  coti   Sep-07-10 01:13 AM   #66 
                       - Let me try to provide the summary.  BzaDem   Sep-07-10 01:19 AM   #67 
     - Obama would hand Democrats a major weapon if only  eridani   Sep-07-10 02:21 AM   #71 
  - Republicans Joe Miller (AK) and Sharron Angle (NV) want to, BUT they are NOT Democrats! n/t  Tx4obama   Sep-06-10 11:59 PM   #47 
  - Bottom line...  Tx4obama   Sep-07-10 12:02 AM   #48 
  - Of course he hasn't said it. He's leaving that to the commission he set up.  coti   Sep-07-10 12:04 AM   #49 
     - What bill? There is no bill. A recommendation is NOT a bill.  Tx4obama   Sep-07-10 12:06 AM   #51 
        - There's no recommendation yet, either.  coti   Sep-07-10 12:08 AM   #52 
        - I am done with you. You have no proof, no citations, nothing. Ciao! n/t  Tx4obama   Sep-07-10 12:10 AM   #53 
           - Like I said, see post #38.  coti   Sep-07-10 12:12 AM   #54 
              - He actually create the commission to solve the entire deficit problem, not just Social Security.  BzaDem   Sep-07-10 01:03 AM   #63 
                 - He knew very well what the commission would do, before even taking office.  coti   Sep-07-10 01:10 AM   #65 
                    - That is not at all surprising. Overhauling Medicare in particular is necessary, because  BzaDem   Sep-07-10 01:24 AM   #68 
        - It is the same bill that makes Martians overlords of the US!  whistler162   Sep-07-10 07:57 AM   #74 
           - You shouldn't use irony when you're going to end up being proven wrong.  coti   Sep-07-10 10:57 PM   #77 
  - It's not on the bargaining table and he knows that.  chill_wind   Sep-07-10 12:32 AM   #56 
  - Good post. nt  coti   Sep-07-10 12:38 AM   #58 
  - Spot on.  ipaint   Sep-07-10 08:11 AM   #75 
  - I for damn sure won't sit home and let the party of NO take over!  Stellar   Sep-07-10 04:38 PM   #76 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC