You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #37: On military ranges E3s dig the rounds out of the berm [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. On military ranges E3s dig the rounds out of the berm
Can't speak for civilian ranges since I've never worked at one, but in the Marines you'll spend a lot of time as a Lance Corporal picking up brass on the firing line and picking rounds out of the berm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -To prevent harm or even death is it all or nothing in the gun debate? Union Label  May-17-07 12:11 PM   #0 
  - I won't be much help here but I think the 2nd amendment should  BOSSHOG   May-17-07 12:21 PM   #1 
  - So did you take your snarkey pills this morning?  Union Label   May-17-07 12:30 PM   #3 
  - I think you are being too anti-gun here  unpossibles   May-17-07 12:31 PM   #4 
  - I'm sorry  BOSSHOG   May-17-07 12:33 PM   #5 
  - absolutely, and only the wishy-washy say nay  iverglas   May-18-07 01:06 PM   #39 
  - Ah, the smell of straw on a warm sunny spring day  krispos42   May-17-07 02:14 PM   #14 
  - Don't worry, it's coming!  SteveM   May-17-07 02:41 PM   #21 
  - I've got my preemptive response...  krispos42   May-17-07 02:50 PM   #23 
     - That magazine! Ummm, so well-hung for a fossil.  SteveM   May-17-07 03:23 PM   #29 
  - Oh I see  BOSSHOG   May-17-07 03:22 PM   #28 
     - Like he said...Strawman...  beevul   May-18-07 01:36 PM   #43 
     - Schools are arming nobody  krispos42   May-18-07 03:42 PM   #65 
  - Bosshog...  Madspirit   May-18-07 10:03 PM   #115 
  - An inconvenient externality  dave_p   May-17-07 12:29 PM   #2 
  - Gun manufacturing may be killing the Earth  wuushew   May-17-07 12:35 PM   #6 
  - Then you'd better kill me now then, in global self-defense  krispos42   May-17-07 02:32 PM   #18 
     - I'm not a hypocrite, we need less of everything (including guns)  wuushew   May-17-07 03:35 PM   #30 
        - Most bullets are copper-cased lead  krispos42   May-18-07 03:56 AM   #32 
        - On military ranges E3s dig the rounds out of the berm  dmesg   May-18-07 12:40 PM   #37 
        - Use joules...the energy expended is minuscule.  benEzra   May-18-07 10:34 AM   #34 
  - Sophistry is alive and well at Stanford  slackmaster   May-17-07 12:40 PM   #7 
  - I'm getting pretty goddamn sick of people saying we want everyone to be armed.  karlrschneider   May-17-07 12:45 PM   #9 
  - I don't blame you  merh   May-17-07 12:52 PM   #11 
  - I think some people in the middle don't realize the impact of some gun-control proposals.  benEzra   May-18-07 10:44 AM   #35 
  - Sorry, you don't need an assault rifle to exercise your right to  merh   May-18-07 01:26 PM   #40 
     - What does an assault rifle have to do with a ban on assault weapons?  beevul   May-18-07 01:41 PM   #45 
     - exactly - lawfully owned guns can kill well armed and protected  merh   May-18-07 02:32 PM   #51 
     - This is the dishonesty I mentioned (not your dishonesty; lawmakers' dishonesty)  dmesg   May-18-07 01:45 PM   #46 
     - Nothing dishonest about it, except for your implication that a banning  merh   May-18-07 02:43 PM   #53 
     - Thank you for finally getting concrete  dmesg   May-18-07 03:15 PM   #59 
        - I've been honest from the start, it is you that hasn't.  merh   May-18-07 03:41 PM   #63 
           - What you're calling "regulation," WE call "confiscation"  derby378   May-18-07 03:44 PM   #66 
           - And you are wrong in using that term, thus you are being dishonest.  merh   May-18-07 03:46 PM   #68 
              - Then prove me wrong  derby378   May-18-07 03:48 PM   #70 
                 - How about the words from the SCOTUS opinion on the  merh   May-18-07 04:08 PM   #73 
                    - Are you really sure Miller is a decision you want to lean on?  beevul   May-18-07 04:22 PM   #76 
                    - No more than I want them running around with nuclear weapons,  merh   May-18-07 04:26 PM   #78 
                       - Nor would I.  beevul   May-18-07 04:47 PM   #89 
                       - LOL, I think its funny that losing the access to assault weapons  merh   May-18-07 05:02 PM   #95 
                          - It upsets people, because theres no good reason for it.  beevul   May-18-07 05:13 PM   #99 
                          - A ban on books the Moral Majority disapproves of would bother me, too...  benEzra   May-18-07 06:01 PM   #107 
                             - The Next Time Somebody Uses A Book Or A Volvo......  Paladin   May-18-07 09:24 PM   #113 
                             - Guess what? I'm not in the Gungeon, either...  derby378   May-18-07 10:32 PM   #117 
                             - Time and History Are Most Assuredly NOT On Your Side  Paladin   May-19-07 09:27 AM   #138 
                             - *sigh*  derby378   May-19-07 10:09 PM   #159 
                             - Try Some Ben Gay On That Strain  Paladin   May-20-07 01:06 PM   #163 
                             - I hate to kick the stupid thing too  iverglas   May-20-07 12:44 PM   #161 
                             - Don't Take It Personally, Iverglass  Paladin   May-20-07 04:39 PM   #165 
                             - oh, I didn't ;)  iverglas   May-20-07 05:06 PM   #166 
                             - The ADL would care to differ, I'd bet.  piedmont   May-19-07 01:42 AM   #122 
                             - ADL Personnel Can Read Crime Stats, Just As I Can  Paladin   May-19-07 09:00 AM   #137 
                             - Books don't kill, people do.  merh   May-19-07 01:15 AM   #121 
                             - I think the Anti-Defamation League might disagree with you  piedmont   May-19-07 01:43 AM   #123 
                             - you know, you are right.  merh   May-19-07 01:49 AM   #124 
                             - Not so good with analogies, are we?  benEzra   May-19-07 06:12 AM   #132 
                             - Not a bad analogy  merh   May-19-07 08:47 AM   #134 
                             - As you well know, AUTOMATIC WEAPONS ARE ALREADY RESTRICTED  benEzra   May-19-07 02:32 PM   #153 
                             - I don't give a rat's ass  merh   May-19-07 02:34 PM   #154 
                             - If you can't address the argument, attack the arguer...  benEzra   May-19-07 02:47 PM   #157 
                             - Seriously, what is your issue here?  dmesg   May-19-07 08:52 PM   #158 
                             - I hate to kick this stupid thread again, but I have to in order to  merh   May-19-07 11:34 PM   #160 
                             - Explain that...  beevul   May-19-07 02:36 PM   #155 
                             - So would a ban on books the Moral Majority approves of n/t  krispos42   May-19-07 01:42 PM   #147 
                       - If your only point is that "gun ownership can be regulated" in harmony with the Constitution...  derby378   May-18-07 04:55 PM   #92 
                       - The simplicity of the 2nd amendment is lost on you, isn't it.  merh   May-18-07 04:59 PM   #94 
                          - That's what we've been saying all along...  derby378   May-18-07 10:28 PM   #116 
                       - Yes, gun ownership can be regulated  krispos42   May-19-07 02:28 AM   #127 
                    - And that, incidentally, becomes a question of fact  dmesg   May-18-07 04:51 PM   #90 
                       - Not really, and you don't want to go there.  merh   May-18-07 05:50 PM   #105 
           - You can speak freely on even-numbered Tuesdays  krispos42   May-19-07 02:17 AM   #126 
     - Count me, then, as one of the VERY few  derby378   May-18-07 03:41 PM   #64 
     - Define 'assault rifle'  EstimatedProphet   May-18-07 01:48 PM   #47 
        - It goes beyond that.  beevul   May-18-07 01:59 PM   #49 
           - No it hasn't the language is quite clear.  merh   May-18-07 02:48 PM   #54 
           - Clear as mud.  beevul   May-18-07 04:05 PM   #72 
           - lol, I am aware of what is on the list of weapons and I don't need your  merh   May-18-07 04:12 PM   #74 
              - Are you?  beevul   May-18-07 04:35 PM   #84 
                 - OMG talk about your strawman  merh   May-18-07 05:35 PM   #100 
                    - The point is how bans are recieved by the people they effect.  beevul   May-18-07 05:44 PM   #102 
                       - No, that is no point and not anywhere near making sense.  merh   May-18-07 05:48 PM   #104 
                          - Well...you can say its not a point...  beevul   May-18-07 06:11 PM   #108 
                          - It isn't the same damn thing. A woman's body, her living being  merh   May-18-07 06:25 PM   #110 
                             - You're right. It isn't the same damn thing.  beevul   May-18-07 07:01 PM   #111 
                                - The rights a woman has to her body doesn't require an amendment  merh   May-18-07 10:58 PM   #118 
                                   - You just don't get it.  beevul   May-18-07 11:34 PM   #119 
                                   - No, you don't get it.  merh   May-18-07 11:43 PM   #120 
                                   - Apparently it does  krispos42   May-19-07 02:55 AM   #130 
                                   - Tell you what, you start a thread comparing the movement to  merh   May-19-07 08:50 AM   #135 
                                   - Again, the automatic weapon thing  krispos42   May-19-07 10:14 AM   #139 
                                   - LOL  merh   May-19-07 10:35 AM   #141 
                                   - Click the link in my previous post  krispos42   May-19-07 11:52 AM   #142 
                                   - good for you, you actually were goofy enough to post that  merh   May-19-07 12:43 PM   #143 
                                   - I don't have to  krispos42   May-19-07 01:23 PM   #144 
                                   - Wrong  merh   May-19-07 01:30 PM   #145 
                                   - They are doing it based on the 'other' body in her body  krispos42   May-19-07 01:40 PM   #146 
                                   - well tell you what anti-freeper person  merh   May-19-07 01:45 PM   #148 
                                   - Deleted message  Name removed   May-19-07 01:53 PM   #149 
                                   - I'm not pro-freeper, I don't believe your's or their stupid agrumentsd  merh   May-19-07 02:05 PM   #150 
                                   - Yet you use their argument  krispos42   May-19-07 02:26 PM   #151 
                                   - Nope, my argument is common sense and is limited to the  merh   May-19-07 02:31 PM   #152 
                                   - Heh heh, 'common sense'  krispos42   May-19-07 02:43 PM   #156 
                          - The arguments are similar  krispos42   May-19-07 02:52 AM   #129 
           - Umm...H.R.1022 bans the most popular civilian target rifle BY NAME...  benEzra   May-18-07 04:59 PM   #93 
           - You apparently don't know even the basics of this debate.  piedmont   May-19-07 01:56 AM   #125 
           - And where is hunting in the 2nd Amendment?  krispos42   May-19-07 02:43 AM   #128 
              - oh go back to the gun forum and piss and moan there  merh   May-19-07 08:52 AM   #136 
           - That's true, and I wasn't careful in how I worded it either  EstimatedProphet   May-18-07 08:54 PM   #112 
  - To be frank, we've earned that reputation as a party  dmesg   May-18-07 12:46 PM   #38 
     - Banning popular weapons does not equate to a violation of the  merh   May-18-07 01:28 PM   #41 
        - I don't doubt the power to regulate  dmesg   May-18-07 01:40 PM   #44 
        - Thats debatable.  beevul   May-18-07 01:51 PM   #48 
        - Not it is not debatable, it is fact.  merh   May-18-07 02:33 PM   #52 
           - Saying so does not make it so.  beevul   May-18-07 03:05 PM   #58 
              - What part of the 2nd amendment forbides the regulation of weapons?  merh   May-18-07 03:38 PM   #62 
                 - No gun discussion is complete without the nuclear strawman...  beevul   May-18-07 04:14 PM   #75 
                    - It is not a strawman, a nuclear weapon is an "arm" - it is a weapon  merh   May-18-07 04:23 PM   #77 
                       - Where do you get the idea that we think any regulation is unconstitutional?  dmesg   May-18-07 04:47 PM   #88 
                       - Not that I have read.  merh   May-18-07 04:54 PM   #91 
                          - That's different  dmesg   May-18-07 05:04 PM   #97 
                             - it is not our parties fault  merh   May-18-07 05:37 PM   #101 
                                - Gun regulations are also not the same thing as gun BANS.  beevul   May-18-07 05:56 PM   #106 
                                   - Wrong, but you go right ahead and try to convince folks of your lies.  merh   May-18-07 06:24 PM   #109 
                                      - What lies?  beevul   May-18-07 09:56 PM   #114 
                                      - Red herring...that question was settled by COMPROMISE 73 years ago.  benEzra   May-19-07 06:26 AM   #133 
                       - The Second Amendment debate is generally about small arms...  beevul   May-18-07 05:03 PM   #96 
        - And I want to add something  dmesg   May-18-07 02:06 PM   #50 
           - You are condescending to me, so why not expect it back.  merh   May-18-07 02:51 PM   #56 
              - Condescending would be...  dmesg   May-18-07 03:26 PM   #60 
                 - It's not my place to tell you about your purdy guns  merh   May-18-07 03:48 PM   #69 
                    - Delete -- net gremlins  dmesg   May-18-07 04:40 PM   #85 
                    - Huh?  dmesg   May-18-07 04:42 PM   #86 
                    - I could care less what you think of the AWB  merh   May-18-07 05:47 PM   #103 
                       - What a ridiculous argument  BaronBootRag   May-19-07 04:29 AM   #131 
                       - For heaven's sake...  dmesg   May-20-07 02:08 PM   #164 
                    - I'm not allowed on any "pro Bush" board I've ever visited  dmesg   May-18-07 04:45 PM   #87 
                       - Well, I do understand that, I get banned too from boards with  merh   May-18-07 05:04 PM   #98 
  - Yes. What happened to choice?  krispos42   May-17-07 02:36 PM   #20 
  - You are right. I can sell my gun to the guy sitting next to me anytime we agree to a price.  Sapere aude   May-17-07 02:33 PM   #19 
  - Total disarmament in this country is about as likely as me getting elected Pope.  karlrschneider   May-17-07 12:43 PM   #8 
  - All citizens should be armed...with a bag of marshmallows.  Tierra_y_Libertad   May-17-07 12:46 PM   #10 
  - If you arm everyone with bags of marshmallows  slackmaster   May-17-07 12:52 PM   #12 
  - Only if one makes shaky assumptions, like this piece did.  damntexdem   May-17-07 02:10 PM   #13 
  - "No guns, no crime" bull  krispos42   May-17-07 02:24 PM   #15 
  - Your observations do not connect  Az   May-17-07 02:45 PM   #22 
  - That was not my argument  krispos42   May-17-07 02:53 PM   #24 
  - See post #26 below. "Suggestive" is often post hoc, ergo propter hoc (nt)  SteveM   May-17-07 03:18 PM   #27 
  - Until you look at comparisons *WITHIN* the United States...  benEzra   May-18-07 10:53 AM   #36 
  - Comparing gun crime to knife crime is ludicrous  lynyrd_skynyrd   May-17-07 03:01 PM   #25 
     - I'm trying to lower the number of dead bodies  krispos42   May-18-07 04:09 AM   #33 
        - But those extra people killed by knives aren't as dead as the people killed by guns would've been,  piedmont   May-18-07 01:36 PM   #42 
           - The difference:  lynyrd_skynyrd   May-18-07 02:48 PM   #55 
              - So you'd happily see more people dead if fewer of them were innocent bystanders?  piedmont   May-18-07 02:53 PM   #57 
                 - I'd happily see no people dead at all  lynyrd_skynyrd   May-18-07 03:48 PM   #71 
  - This is the textbook definition of "extremism"  Squatch   May-17-07 02:25 PM   #16 
  - Disarm who? The law abiding? They already obey.  Sapere aude   May-17-07 02:26 PM   #17 
  - Prohis know banning will have no substantial impact on crime.  SteveM   May-17-07 03:07 PM   #26 
  - It's NOT all-or-nothing...  benEzra   May-17-07 04:19 PM   #31 
  - oooh, you mean like this guy?  iverglas   May-18-07 04:33 PM   #82 
  - Amazing.  qdemn7   May-18-07 03:29 PM   #61 
  - isn't it just?  iverglas   May-18-07 04:30 PM   #81 
  - The author is right about one thing...  D__S   May-18-07 03:45 PM   #67 
  - you can fool some of the people all of the time  iverglas   May-18-07 04:28 PM   #80 
  - well, that was an utterly incoherent screed  iverglas   May-18-07 04:27 PM   #79 
  - Read There ^^ Or Be Square  iverglas   May-18-07 04:34 PM   #83 
  - THE O.P. LINKS TO A RIGHT-WING SCREED. Read post 79 fer fuck's sake  iverglas   May-19-07 10:20 AM   #140 
  - I haven't read  Madspirit   May-20-07 01:03 PM   #162 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC