billlll
(434 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-02-10 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
| 23. Backward Transfer? if someone defined it i cd not spot |
|
It in chatter about 3 or 5 to 1.
Pls teach me the def. TKS all for the thread. See also my re on expanding revenue. JFK.
|
| -"the Right cannot afford to have a Social Security system that is perceived to be working" |
Hannah Bell |
Aug-31-10 10:05 PM |
#0 |
 -
Well that explains the right, now about Obama ....... |
DJ13 |
Aug-31-10 10:07 PM |
#1 |
  -
+1 |
SammyWinstonJack |
Sep-02-10 09:58 AM |
#24 |
| -
so true, the wealthy have carried their hatred over several generations |
KakistocracyHater |
Aug-31-10 10:58 PM |
#2 |
| -
nice quote k&r-nt |
Poboy |
Aug-31-10 11:03 PM |
#3 |
| -
K&R |
Faryn Balyncd |
Aug-31-10 11:07 PM |
#4 |
| -
K&R |
pinboy3niner |
Aug-31-10 11:21 PM |
#5 |
| -
JFK 92% tax rate at top.... we can expand ss to |
billlll |
Aug-31-10 11:37 PM |
#6 |
| -
For my entire adult life I have been told the problem with SS is the expected ratio of |
dkf |
Sep-01-10 01:38 AM |
#7 |
| -
Backwds Transfer? Pls define |
billlll |
Sep-01-10 01:46 AM |
#8 |
| -
Nowadays the demographics have 5 workers for every retiree. |
dkf |
Sep-01-10 02:13 AM |
#9 |
| -
no, there were 5 workers for every retiree in the 60s. |
Hannah Bell |
Sep-01-10 03:25 AM |
#10 |
| -
That is from a current CBO assessment of SS. |
dkf |
Sep-01-10 09:43 AM |
#13 |
| -
link? link? there are currently about 3 workers per retiree: per the social security trustees: |
Hannah Bell |
Sep-01-10 12:39 PM |
#14 |
| -
Long term Outlook for Social Security |
dkf |
Sep-01-10 04:04 PM |
#17 |
| -
perhaps you could point out the part about there currently being 5 workers for every SS recipient. |
Hannah Bell |
Sep-01-10 08:04 PM |
#18 |
| -
It's the part about the demographics of 18-64 vs 65+ |
dkf |
Sep-01-10 08:07 PM |
#20 |
| -
you get the distinction between "population" & "workers"? |
Hannah Bell |
Sep-02-10 01:50 PM |
#25 |
| -
and the demographics in that chart, which show 4/10 over 65, isn't in line with current |
Hannah Bell |
Sep-02-10 02:51 PM |
#27 |
| -
Or, working SEC, OSHA, etc.! |
DailyGrind51 |
Sep-01-10 05:58 AM |
#11 |
| -
k&r |
blindpig |
Sep-01-10 06:53 AM |
#12 |
| -
What they want is desperate downtrodden serfs. |
hobbit709 |
Sep-01-10 12:44 PM |
#15 |
| -
& if they can destroy SS with Democrats "in power", the Right won't get blamed! |
Faryn Balyncd |
Sep-01-10 12:52 PM |
#16 |
| -
Yes but they're 'New' Democrats. |
glitch |
Sep-01-10 09:54 PM |
#22 |
| -
K & R !!! |
WillyT |
Sep-01-10 08:07 PM |
#19 |
| -
If Social Security was just headed for the cliff, |
maryf |
Sep-01-10 09:23 PM |
#21 |
| -
Backward Transfer? if someone defined it i cd not spot |
billlll |
Sep-02-10 09:56 AM |
#23 |
| -
transfer from workers to capital, from workers to owners, from ruled to rulers. |
Hannah Bell |
Sep-02-10 02:05 PM |
#26 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread