You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #48: publishing handles who are unrec and reccing [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-10 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #34
48. publishing handles who are unrec and reccing
it would show the same people. I've noticed that the same crew turn up on certain issues!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -I just had a thought about the rec/unrec feature: CaliforniaPeggy  Aug-21-10 11:36 AM   #0 
  - Only members can use it. Do you mean contributors? nt  onehandle   Aug-21-10 11:38 AM   #1 
  - Ah, I did not realize that.  CaliforniaPeggy   Aug-21-10 11:44 AM   #4 
     - Republican hit teams would donate?  Rosa Luxemburg   Aug-22-10 09:00 AM   #38 
  - There is nothing to prevent the people you  enlightenment   Aug-21-10 11:40 AM   #2 
  - but at least they have to kick in & support DU nt  WolverineDG   Aug-21-10 11:51 AM   #5 
  - There you go again, being realistic and honest  havocmom   Aug-21-10 12:02 PM   #10 
     - Restrictive litmus tests  txlibdem   Aug-21-10 12:23 PM   #14 
        - Agree. Making the tent ever smaller assures self-made minority status  havocmom   Aug-21-10 01:19 PM   #17 
  - I suggested that but added the caveat that  malaise   Aug-21-10 11:43 AM   #3 
  - I'm thinking it should be restricted to donors...  SidDithers   Aug-21-10 11:55 AM   #6 
  - Seriously?  whatchamacallit   Aug-21-10 11:57 AM   #7 
  - No, not seriously...  SidDithers   Aug-21-10 11:58 AM   #9 
     - Ha you got me  whatchamacallit   Aug-21-10 12:02 PM   #11 
  - Oh, GOOD idea!  CaliforniaPeggy   Aug-21-10 11:57 AM   #8 
  - and with user names that do not begin with 'S'.  Warren Stupidity   Aug-21-10 12:16 PM   #12 
  - Hey, just a gol-darned minute there, buster!  scarletwoman   Aug-22-10 12:19 AM   #33 
     - your name begins with 's' not 'S'  Warren Stupidity   Aug-22-10 08:40 AM   #35 
        - Oh. Well that's alright then. Carry on.  scarletwoman   Aug-22-10 09:15 AM   #50 
  - That doesn't sound fair.  Mimosa   Aug-21-10 01:36 PM   #20 
  - Sounds good!  Forkboy   Aug-21-10 01:43 PM   #25 
  - How about just wealthy, white, male landowners?  Dr.Phool   Aug-21-10 01:43 PM   #26 
     - just wealthy ones  Rosa Luxemburg   Aug-22-10 09:02 AM   #39 
     - Wealthy, with lots and lots of free time  Seneca   Aug-22-10 09:03 AM   #41 
     - Non-donors could get 3/5 of a rec/unrec!  NoPasaran   Aug-22-10 09:13 AM   #49 
        - Perfect reply  Seneca   Aug-22-10 09:23 AM   #52 
  - It just needs to go.  MoonRiver   Aug-21-10 12:19 PM   #13 
  - + 1,000,000,000  WillyT   Aug-21-10 01:48 PM   #28 
  - This thread proves your point. n/t  AngryOldDem   Aug-22-10 09:08 AM   #45 
  - Why do we need rec/unrec at all? If the post is good it's good. If it's not, it's not.  DevonRex   Aug-21-10 12:31 PM   #15 
  - Well, the admins thought we needed it.  CaliforniaPeggy   Aug-21-10 12:36 PM   #16 
  - I never look at the Greatest Page.  azmouse   Aug-21-10 01:39 PM   #22 
  - AMEN  SoCalDem   Aug-21-10 11:22 PM   #31 
     - In short, rec/unrec doesn't add to the discussion, increases divisiveness,  DevonRex   Aug-22-10 10:08 AM   #64 
  - Just add a feature that displays the recs/unrecs with user names.  Gormy Cuss   Aug-21-10 01:29 PM   #18 
  - I am for that, in the thread it will show a kick with username and their vote  The Straight Story   Aug-21-10 01:38 PM   #21 
     - could be interesting!  Rosa Luxemburg   Aug-22-10 09:04 AM   #42 
        - Sorry, but it could be horrible! Can you imagine wading through a thread that had a hundred recs  scarletwoman   Aug-22-10 09:33 AM   #59 
           - could have a little drop down menu at the top of the original op post  Rosa Luxemburg   Aug-22-10 09:36 AM   #60 
              - That might be a reasonable solution. I'm just not sure I agree about showing usernames at all.  scarletwoman   Aug-22-10 10:01 AM   #63 
                 - Unrec is the problem.  Gormy Cuss   Aug-22-10 10:56 AM   #68 
                    - That would clearly be the simplest solution.  scarletwoman   Aug-22-10 11:08 AM   #69 
  - I've never had a problem with un-rec  Mimosa   Aug-21-10 01:34 PM   #19 
  - I thought and argued that it would keep minority opiions off the GP  EFerrari   Aug-21-10 01:43 PM   #24 
  - I like recs/unrecs; they make DU the best online game EVAR! n/t  LoZoccolo   Aug-21-10 01:40 PM   #23 
  - then you could have a meter that would ding when it reached the top  Rosa Luxemburg   Aug-22-10 09:05 AM   #43 
  - How about charging 10 cents per Unrec? Recs would still be free.  AnArmyVeteran   Aug-21-10 01:45 PM   #27 
  - The opposition would gladly pay for that  Rosa Luxemburg   Aug-22-10 09:06 AM   #44 
     - How about one dollar per unrec?  Boojatta   Aug-22-10 11:19 AM   #70 
  - Can't have it both ways....  Desertrose   Aug-21-10 01:52 PM   #29 
  - Three options  NJmaverick   Aug-21-10 10:27 PM   #30 
  - I like your options...  CaliforniaPeggy   Aug-22-10 12:12 AM   #32 
  - With the economy the way it is  XemaSab   Aug-22-10 11:26 AM   #71 
  - jesus christ on meth  Seneca   Aug-22-10 08:57 AM   #36 
  - Thank you for cutting straight through the crap. Well said.  scarletwoman   Aug-22-10 10:16 AM   #65 
  - Do you have a logical reason to oppose the ideas?  NJmaverick   Aug-22-10 12:50 PM   #77 
     - Here you go:  scarletwoman   Aug-22-10 02:24 PM   #81 
        - OK  NJmaverick   Aug-22-10 04:23 PM   #83 
           - Again:  scarletwoman   Aug-22-10 04:55 PM   #84 
  - Do you have a logical reason to oppose the ideas?  NJmaverick   Aug-22-10 12:50 PM   #76 
     - Yes  Seneca   Aug-22-10 07:54 PM   #86 
        - I hope you read his response to my answer to the same question.  scarletwoman   Aug-22-10 08:01 PM   #87 
           - Truth be told  Seneca   Aug-22-10 08:42 PM   #88 
  - slight problem  Rosa Luxemburg   Aug-22-10 09:10 AM   #46 
  - you think "trolls" don't buy stars?  CreekDog   Aug-22-10 12:10 PM   #72 
     - It can be done but it becomes expensive and DU makes money on the deal  NJmaverick   Aug-22-10 01:03 PM   #78 
  - Hitting you an unrec for poll tax tactics, Peggy  TheKentuckian   Aug-22-10 12:31 AM   #34 
  - publishing handles who are unrec and reccing  Rosa Luxemburg   Aug-22-10 09:12 AM   #48 
  - I've suggested this before  proud2BlibKansan   Aug-22-10 08:59 AM   #37 
  - You have no evidence of your paranoid assertion  Seneca   Aug-22-10 09:02 AM   #40 
  - Au contraire. There is tons of evidence.  proud2BlibKansan   Aug-22-10 09:11 AM   #47 
  - How do you know?  Seneca   Aug-22-10 09:27 AM   #54 
     - Republicans and other non Dem groups will donate just to come here  Rosa Luxemburg   Aug-22-10 09:32 AM   #57 
     - Why would a troll donate money here?  proud2BlibKansan   Aug-22-10 09:37 AM   #61 
        - Why not? Spend a few bucks and you have instant credibility.  Gormy Cuss   Aug-22-10 09:53 AM   #62 
        - I just posted this same thing -- exactly  LostinVA   Aug-22-10 10:38 AM   #67 
        - Most of the Organized CC Trolls donate  LostinVA   Aug-22-10 10:36 AM   #66 
        - yes  Rosa Luxemburg   Aug-22-10 01:11 PM   #79 
        - because stars are cheap  CreekDog   Aug-22-10 12:15 PM   #74 
        - $1 buys credibility  LostinVA   Aug-22-10 01:29 PM   #80 
  - A portion is legitimate rating. Another portion is chronically malicious.  UTUSN   Aug-22-10 09:26 AM   #53 
     - Highlighting n/t  UTUSN   Aug-22-10 08:51 PM   #89 
  - I unrec threads that misinform or ones that I strongly disagree with  CreekDog   Aug-22-10 12:12 PM   #73 
  - This is a form of bigotry agaisnt those  TZ   Aug-22-10 09:15 AM   #51 
  - I don't like the donate option  Rosa Luxemburg   Aug-22-10 09:30 AM   #56 
  - an example of more unrecs than recs on a Democratic DU board  Rosa Luxemburg   Aug-22-10 09:29 AM   #55 
  - I think the whole rec/unrec should be thrown out, because it encourages OPs full of popular rhetoric  Brickbat   Aug-22-10 09:32 AM   #58 
  - Why do we have them? I don't even Rec or Unrec. Why should ANYBODY?  CTyankee   Aug-22-10 05:00 PM   #85 
  - the only thing i care about is misinformation and misrepresentation  CreekDog   Aug-22-10 12:20 PM   #75 
  - I like it how it is.  LostInAnomie   Aug-22-10 02:31 PM   #82 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC