Rosa Luxemburg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-22-10 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
| 43. then you could have a meter that would ding when it reached the top |
|
(sorry Skinner, getting carried away here!)
|
| -I just had a thought about the rec/unrec feature: |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Aug-21-10 11:36 AM |
#0 |
 -
Only members can use it. Do you mean contributors? nt |
onehandle |
Aug-21-10 11:38 AM |
#1 |
  -
Ah, I did not realize that. |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Aug-21-10 11:44 AM |
#4 |
| -
Republican hit teams would donate? |
Rosa Luxemburg |
Aug-22-10 09:00 AM |
#38 |
| -
There is nothing to prevent the people you |
enlightenment |
Aug-21-10 11:40 AM |
#2 |
| -
but at least they have to kick in & support DU nt |
WolverineDG |
Aug-21-10 11:51 AM |
#5 |
| -
There you go again, being realistic and honest |
havocmom |
Aug-21-10 12:02 PM |
#10 |
| -
Restrictive litmus tests |
txlibdem |
Aug-21-10 12:23 PM |
#14 |
| -
Agree. Making the tent ever smaller assures self-made minority status |
havocmom |
Aug-21-10 01:19 PM |
#17 |
| -
I suggested that but added the caveat that |
malaise |
Aug-21-10 11:43 AM |
#3 |
| -
I'm thinking it should be restricted to donors... |
SidDithers |
Aug-21-10 11:55 AM |
#6 |
| -
Seriously? |
whatchamacallit |
Aug-21-10 11:57 AM |
#7 |
| -
No, not seriously... |
SidDithers |
Aug-21-10 11:58 AM |
#9 |
| -
Ha you got me |
whatchamacallit |
Aug-21-10 12:02 PM |
#11 |
| -
Oh, GOOD idea! |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Aug-21-10 11:57 AM |
#8 |
| -
and with user names that do not begin with 'S'. |
Warren Stupidity |
Aug-21-10 12:16 PM |
#12 |
| -
Hey, just a gol-darned minute there, buster! |
scarletwoman |
Aug-22-10 12:19 AM |
#33 |
| -
your name begins with 's' not 'S' |
Warren Stupidity |
Aug-22-10 08:40 AM |
#35 |
| -
Oh. Well that's alright then. Carry on. |
scarletwoman |
Aug-22-10 09:15 AM |
#50 |
| -
That doesn't sound fair. |
Mimosa |
Aug-21-10 01:36 PM |
#20 |
| -
Sounds good! |
Forkboy |
Aug-21-10 01:43 PM |
#25 |
| -
How about just wealthy, white, male landowners? |
Dr.Phool |
Aug-21-10 01:43 PM |
#26 |
| -
just wealthy ones |
Rosa Luxemburg |
Aug-22-10 09:02 AM |
#39 |
| -
Wealthy, with lots and lots of free time |
Seneca |
Aug-22-10 09:03 AM |
#41 |
| -
Non-donors could get 3/5 of a rec/unrec! |
NoPasaran |
Aug-22-10 09:13 AM |
#49 |
| -
Perfect reply |
Seneca |
Aug-22-10 09:23 AM |
#52 |
| -
It just needs to go. |
MoonRiver |
Aug-21-10 12:19 PM |
#13 |
| -
+ 1,000,000,000 |
WillyT |
Aug-21-10 01:48 PM |
#28 |
| -
This thread proves your point. n/t |
AngryOldDem |
Aug-22-10 09:08 AM |
#45 |
| -
Why do we need rec/unrec at all? If the post is good it's good. If it's not, it's not. |
DevonRex |
Aug-21-10 12:31 PM |
#15 |
| -
Well, the admins thought we needed it. |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Aug-21-10 12:36 PM |
#16 |
| -
I never look at the Greatest Page. |
azmouse |
Aug-21-10 01:39 PM |
#22 |
| -
AMEN |
SoCalDem |
Aug-21-10 11:22 PM |
#31 |
| -
In short, rec/unrec doesn't add to the discussion, increases divisiveness, |
DevonRex |
Aug-22-10 10:08 AM |
#64 |
| -
Just add a feature that displays the recs/unrecs with user names. |
Gormy Cuss |
Aug-21-10 01:29 PM |
#18 |
| -
I am for that, in the thread it will show a kick with username and their vote |
The Straight Story |
Aug-21-10 01:38 PM |
#21 |
| -
could be interesting! |
Rosa Luxemburg |
Aug-22-10 09:04 AM |
#42 |
| -
Sorry, but it could be horrible! Can you imagine wading through a thread that had a hundred recs |
scarletwoman |
Aug-22-10 09:33 AM |
#59 |
| -
could have a little drop down menu at the top of the original op post |
Rosa Luxemburg |
Aug-22-10 09:36 AM |
#60 |
| -
That might be a reasonable solution. I'm just not sure I agree about showing usernames at all. |
scarletwoman |
Aug-22-10 10:01 AM |
#63 |
| -
Unrec is the problem. |
Gormy Cuss |
Aug-22-10 10:56 AM |
#68 |
| -
That would clearly be the simplest solution. |
scarletwoman |
Aug-22-10 11:08 AM |
#69 |
| -
I've never had a problem with un-rec |
Mimosa |
Aug-21-10 01:34 PM |
#19 |
| -
I thought and argued that it would keep minority opiions off the GP |
EFerrari |
Aug-21-10 01:43 PM |
#24 |
| -
I like recs/unrecs; they make DU the best online game EVAR! n/t |
LoZoccolo |
Aug-21-10 01:40 PM |
#23 |
| -
then you could have a meter that would ding when it reached the top |
Rosa Luxemburg |
Aug-22-10 09:05 AM |
#43 |
| -
How about charging 10 cents per Unrec? Recs would still be free. |
AnArmyVeteran |
Aug-21-10 01:45 PM |
#27 |
| -
The opposition would gladly pay for that |
Rosa Luxemburg |
Aug-22-10 09:06 AM |
#44 |
| -
How about one dollar per unrec? |
Boojatta |
Aug-22-10 11:19 AM |
#70 |
| -
Can't have it both ways.... |
Desertrose |
Aug-21-10 01:52 PM |
#29 |
| -
Three options |
NJmaverick |
Aug-21-10 10:27 PM |
#30 |
| -
I like your options... |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Aug-22-10 12:12 AM |
#32 |
| -
With the economy the way it is |
XemaSab |
Aug-22-10 11:26 AM |
#71 |
| -
jesus christ on meth |
Seneca |
Aug-22-10 08:57 AM |
#36 |
| -
Thank you for cutting straight through the crap. Well said. |
scarletwoman |
Aug-22-10 10:16 AM |
#65 |
| -
Do you have a logical reason to oppose the ideas? |
NJmaverick |
Aug-22-10 12:50 PM |
#77 |
| -
Here you go: |
scarletwoman |
Aug-22-10 02:24 PM |
#81 |
| -
OK |
NJmaverick |
Aug-22-10 04:23 PM |
#83 |
| -
Again: |
scarletwoman |
Aug-22-10 04:55 PM |
#84 |
| -
Do you have a logical reason to oppose the ideas? |
NJmaverick |
Aug-22-10 12:50 PM |
#76 |
| -
Yes |
Seneca |
Aug-22-10 07:54 PM |
#86 |
| -
I hope you read his response to my answer to the same question. |
scarletwoman |
Aug-22-10 08:01 PM |
#87 |
| -
Truth be told |
Seneca |
Aug-22-10 08:42 PM |
#88 |
| -
slight problem |
Rosa Luxemburg |
Aug-22-10 09:10 AM |
#46 |
| -
you think "trolls" don't buy stars? |
CreekDog |
Aug-22-10 12:10 PM |
#72 |
| -
It can be done but it becomes expensive and DU makes money on the deal |
NJmaverick |
Aug-22-10 01:03 PM |
#78 |
| -
Hitting you an unrec for poll tax tactics, Peggy |
TheKentuckian |
Aug-22-10 12:31 AM |
#34 |
| -
publishing handles who are unrec and reccing |
Rosa Luxemburg |
Aug-22-10 09:12 AM |
#48 |
| -
I've suggested this before |
proud2BlibKansan |
Aug-22-10 08:59 AM |
#37 |
| -
You have no evidence of your paranoid assertion |
Seneca |
Aug-22-10 09:02 AM |
#40 |
| -
Au contraire. There is tons of evidence. |
proud2BlibKansan |
Aug-22-10 09:11 AM |
#47 |
| -
How do you know? |
Seneca |
Aug-22-10 09:27 AM |
#54 |
| -
Republicans and other non Dem groups will donate just to come here |
Rosa Luxemburg |
Aug-22-10 09:32 AM |
#57 |
| -
Why would a troll donate money here? |
proud2BlibKansan |
Aug-22-10 09:37 AM |
#61 |
| -
Why not? Spend a few bucks and you have instant credibility. |
Gormy Cuss |
Aug-22-10 09:53 AM |
#62 |
| -
I just posted this same thing -- exactly |
LostinVA |
Aug-22-10 10:38 AM |
#67 |
| -
Most of the Organized CC Trolls donate |
LostinVA |
Aug-22-10 10:36 AM |
#66 |
| -
yes |
Rosa Luxemburg |
Aug-22-10 01:11 PM |
#79 |
| -
because stars are cheap |
CreekDog |
Aug-22-10 12:15 PM |
#74 |
| -
$1 buys credibility |
LostinVA |
Aug-22-10 01:29 PM |
#80 |
| -
A portion is legitimate rating. Another portion is chronically malicious. |
UTUSN |
Aug-22-10 09:26 AM |
#53 |
| -
Highlighting n/t |
UTUSN |
Aug-22-10 08:51 PM |
#89 |
| -
I unrec threads that misinform or ones that I strongly disagree with |
CreekDog |
Aug-22-10 12:12 PM |
#73 |
| -
This is a form of bigotry agaisnt those |
TZ |
Aug-22-10 09:15 AM |
#51 |
| -
I don't like the donate option |
Rosa Luxemburg |
Aug-22-10 09:30 AM |
#56 |
| -
an example of more unrecs than recs on a Democratic DU board |
Rosa Luxemburg |
Aug-22-10 09:29 AM |
#55 |
| -
I think the whole rec/unrec should be thrown out, because it encourages OPs full of popular rhetoric |
Brickbat |
Aug-22-10 09:32 AM |
#58 |
| -
Why do we have them? I don't even Rec or Unrec. Why should ANYBODY? |
CTyankee |
Aug-22-10 05:00 PM |
#85 |
| -
the only thing i care about is misinformation and misrepresentation |
CreekDog |
Aug-22-10 12:20 PM |
#75 |
| -
I like it how it is. |
LostInAnomie |
Aug-22-10 02:31 PM |
#82 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread