You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: Straight Up - Yes. N/T [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
21. Straight Up - Yes. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Anybody else think that Gibbs' comments included an inappropriate slam against Kucinich? kath  Aug-11-10 12:38 AM   #0 
  - the whole diatribe was unnecessary, including the slam at kucinich.  niyad   Aug-11-10 12:43 AM   #1 
  - I have come to the conclusion that Robert Gibbs is unnecessary  spiritual_gunfighter   Aug-11-10 01:03 AM   #14 
     - Other than Bill Moyers, you don't get great minds in that position.  Ken Burch   Aug-11-10 01:30 AM   #25 
  - Yes.......it was horrible!  FrenchieCat   Aug-11-10 12:44 AM   #2 
  - Well, I don't think that Kucinich loves the corporations nearly as much as this White House does --  kath   Aug-11-10 12:49 AM   #8 
     - +1  Shining Jack   Aug-11-10 01:13 AM   #17 
     - Kucinich is the Representative of one little place......  FrenchieCat   Aug-11-10 03:30 AM   #28 
     - It's the message that Kucinich brings to the public discussion that  NorthCarolina   Aug-11-10 08:57 AM   #35 
     - Is that why gibbs thought it was ok to use him in pandering to the right?  unapatriciated   Aug-11-10 03:58 PM   #58 
     - +2  QC   Aug-11-10 08:49 AM   #33 
  - I would say so  npk   Aug-11-10 12:44 AM   #3 
  - No, he's just an example of a very liberal Democrat who they say they want as president.  LoZoccolo   Aug-11-10 12:46 AM   #4 
  - Kuchinich is the straw man that they always use...  depakid   Aug-11-10 12:46 AM   #5 
  - it wasn't a slam against Kucinich , he mentioned Kucinich as an example of someone very liberal  JI7   Aug-11-10 12:47 AM   #6 
  - YES.  snot   Aug-11-10 12:48 AM   #7 
  - I don't think it was a slam on Kucinich  BDavinciNY   Aug-11-10 12:55 AM   #9 
  - welcome to DU  niyad   Aug-11-10 02:04 AM   #26 
     - Thanks  BDavinciNY   Aug-11-10 12:57 PM   #45 
  - No.  DFLforever   Aug-11-10 12:56 AM   #10 
  - Yes, I noticed it too.  Jamastiene   Aug-11-10 12:56 AM   #11 
  - Yeah, same here....pissed me off too.  Desertrose   Aug-11-10 01:01 AM   #13 
  - Yes, but it was basically a slam against all of us  Hydra   Aug-11-10 01:01 AM   #12 
  - Yes, he wanted to be sure we heard him loud and clear.  unapatriciated   Aug-11-10 04:02 PM   #60 
  - Appropriateness is relative.  LooseWilly   Aug-11-10 01:03 AM   #15 
  - Kucinich had to be "lobbied" to vote for the health care bills.  PBS Poll-435   Aug-11-10 01:09 AM   #16 
  - Because the bills weren't health CARE reform -we ended up with a Health Insurance Co. Protection Act  kath   Aug-11-10 01:14 AM   #18 
  - But he still voted for it,  PBS Poll-435   Aug-11-10 01:18 AM   #19 
     - Do you think he voted for it on PRINCIPLE, or did he go along to get along?? n/t  cherokeeprogressive   Aug-11-10 01:23 AM   #22 
        - Somewhere in the middle of the two.  PBS Poll-435   Aug-11-10 01:28 AM   #24 
        - Personally...  ElectricLightDem   Aug-11-10 10:18 AM   #40 
           - You should really read what Kucinich wrote about his decision to vote for the bill.  John Q. Citizen   Aug-12-10 12:15 AM   #72 
  - But Obama couldn't be bothered to lobby the likes of LIebermann for a public option  eridani   Aug-11-10 03:22 AM   #27 
  - You and I know that the votes were not there  PBS Poll-435   Aug-11-10 08:45 AM   #31 
  - Kucinich's vote "wasn't there" until his arm was twisted  eridani   Aug-11-10 03:12 PM   #49 
     - Problem was the Senate. Kucinich is a Rep. in the House  PBS Poll-435   Aug-11-10 03:25 PM   #51 
        - No, he wasn't. He didn't the first time. Not sure what he got threatened with  eridani   Aug-11-10 03:41 PM   #54 
           - In the end, after all of the talk, he voted for the final bill  PBS Poll-435   Aug-11-10 03:47 PM   #55 
              - That is pure crap. If Obama had been hands on with the public option from the start  eridani   Aug-11-10 04:00 PM   #59 
                 - Disagree entirely. There are a handful of Democrats in the Senate that NEVER would have  PBS Poll-435   Aug-11-10 04:03 PM   #61 
                    - Not even if their disctricts were threatened with being screwn legislatively? n/t  eridani   Aug-11-10 04:18 PM   #62 
                       - US Senators do not have districts. They represent States.  PBS Poll-435   Aug-11-10 04:30 PM   #63 
                          - Bush did his very best to screw states that voted against him  eridani   Aug-11-10 05:29 PM   #64 
                             - Are there more or less Democrats in the Senate (from the South) now than there were in 1992?  PBS Poll-435   Aug-11-10 05:34 PM   #65 
  - Why would Obama lobby for a PO when he never wanted a PO?  NorthCarolina   Aug-11-10 09:01 AM   #36 
     - EXACTLY - he never wanted one.  kath   Aug-11-10 03:37 PM   #52 
  - Health Insurance Industry Executives Make Millions As  Cherchez la Femme   Aug-11-10 11:36 AM   #42 
     - Again  PBS Poll-435   Aug-11-10 03:38 PM   #53 
  - I didn't read it that way.  Radical Activist   Aug-11-10 01:20 AM   #20 
  - Straight Up - Yes. N/T  cherokeeprogressive   Aug-11-10 01:22 AM   #21 
  - I just said that yesterday, I'm prescient  sandnsea   Aug-11-10 01:24 AM   #23 
  - Hey, everybody loves to punch hippies, am I right? C' mon...right  TheKentuckian   Aug-11-10 04:24 AM   #29 
  - I think he was slammin'  lillypaddle   Aug-11-10 06:54 AM   #30 
  - It was a slam against Kucinich's followers.  liquid diamond   Aug-11-10 08:47 AM   #32 
  - Let me start to answer by saying that I am in the "I love Dennis .... but" camp.  Stinky The Clown   Aug-11-10 08:53 AM   #34 
  - So attacking one of your own party who is running for re-election is appropriate?  KoKo   Aug-11-10 09:09 AM   #37 
  - Please don't misinterpret me. I am in no way defending Gibbs  Stinky The Clown   Aug-11-10 10:13 AM   #39 
  - surprising that you have a but in re to dk..he speaks for me  xiamiam   Aug-11-10 06:59 PM   #70 
  - I can't figure out why Gibbs made the statement.  guardian   Aug-11-10 10:13 AM   #38 
  - DLC has always attacked progressives.  Individualist   Aug-11-10 12:03 PM   #44 
  - Sure did  Cherchez la Femme   Aug-11-10 11:32 AM   #41 
  - If Dennis is as irrelevant as the status quo pretends,  LWolf   Aug-11-10 12:02 PM   #43 
  - YES! without a question! eom  flyarm   Aug-11-10 02:03 PM   #46 
  - that wasn't a slam against Kucinich  Whisp   Aug-11-10 02:06 PM   #47 
  - It did. See what cooperating with this White House gets you? If you're a right winger  Raineyb   Aug-11-10 02:10 PM   #48 
  - "Even electing a peacenik like Kucinich wouldn't satisfy some.  laureloak   Aug-11-10 03:20 PM   #50 
  - THe White House is clearly butthurt over left-leaning criticism  jgraz   Aug-11-10 03:50 PM   #56 
  - Gibbs has a strange way of showing respect.  unapatriciated   Aug-11-10 03:55 PM   #57 
  - Worse it was a slam at Dennis's supporters  Bluenorthwest   Aug-11-10 05:40 PM   #66 
  - I think it was demeaning.  fogonthelake   Aug-11-10 05:45 PM   #67 
  - No, unless you consider calling Kucinich the most liberal of the liberal a slam.  phleshdef   Aug-11-10 05:46 PM   #68 
  - Yes it is.  Stuart G   Aug-11-10 06:31 PM   #69 
  - No. But his point is well taken.  Schema Thing   Aug-11-10 10:01 PM   #71 
  - Interesting to see that a writer at The Nation also thought the Kucinich crack was out of line:  kath   Aug-12-10 12:27 AM   #73 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC