cherokeeprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-11-10 01:22 AM
Response to Original message |
| 21. Straight Up - Yes. N/T |
| -Anybody else think that Gibbs' comments included an inappropriate slam against Kucinich? |
kath |
Aug-11-10 12:38 AM |
#0 |
-
the whole diatribe was unnecessary, including the slam at kucinich. |
niyad |
Aug-11-10 12:43 AM |
#1 |
 -
I have come to the conclusion that Robert Gibbs is unnecessary |
spiritual_gunfighter |
Aug-11-10 01:03 AM |
#14 |
-
Other than Bill Moyers, you don't get great minds in that position. |
Ken Burch |
Aug-11-10 01:30 AM |
#25 |
-
Yes.......it was horrible! |
FrenchieCat |
Aug-11-10 12:44 AM |
#2 |
 -
Well, I don't think that Kucinich loves the corporations nearly as much as this White House does -- |
kath |
Aug-11-10 12:49 AM |
#8 |
-
+1 |
Shining Jack |
Aug-11-10 01:13 AM |
#17 |
-
Kucinich is the Representative of one little place...... |
FrenchieCat |
Aug-11-10 03:30 AM |
#28 |
 -
It's the message that Kucinich brings to the public discussion that |
NorthCarolina |
Aug-11-10 08:57 AM |
#35 |
 -
Is that why gibbs thought it was ok to use him in pandering to the right? |
unapatriciated |
Aug-11-10 03:58 PM |
#58 |
-
+2 |
QC |
Aug-11-10 08:49 AM |
#33 |
-
I would say so |
npk |
Aug-11-10 12:44 AM |
#3 |
-
No, he's just an example of a very liberal Democrat who they say they want as president. |
LoZoccolo |
Aug-11-10 12:46 AM |
#4 |
-
Kuchinich is the straw man that they always use... |
depakid |
Aug-11-10 12:46 AM |
#5 |
-
it wasn't a slam against Kucinich , he mentioned Kucinich as an example of someone very liberal |
JI7 |
Aug-11-10 12:47 AM |
#6 |
-
YES. |
snot |
Aug-11-10 12:48 AM |
#7 |
-
I don't think it was a slam on Kucinich |
BDavinciNY |
Aug-11-10 12:55 AM |
#9 |
 -
welcome to DU |
niyad |
Aug-11-10 02:04 AM |
#26 |
-
Thanks |
BDavinciNY |
Aug-11-10 12:57 PM |
#45 |
-
No. |
DFLforever |
Aug-11-10 12:56 AM |
#10 |
-
Yes, I noticed it too. |
Jamastiene |
Aug-11-10 12:56 AM |
#11 |
 -
Yeah, same here....pissed me off too. |
Desertrose |
Aug-11-10 01:01 AM |
#13 |
-
Yes, but it was basically a slam against all of us |
Hydra |
Aug-11-10 01:01 AM |
#12 |
 -
Yes, he wanted to be sure we heard him loud and clear. |
unapatriciated |
Aug-11-10 04:02 PM |
#60 |
-
Appropriateness is relative. |
LooseWilly |
Aug-11-10 01:03 AM |
#15 |
-
Kucinich had to be "lobbied" to vote for the health care bills. |
PBS Poll-435 |
Aug-11-10 01:09 AM |
#16 |
 -
Because the bills weren't health CARE reform -we ended up with a Health Insurance Co. Protection Act |
kath |
Aug-11-10 01:14 AM |
#18 |
  -
But he still voted for it, |
PBS Poll-435 |
Aug-11-10 01:18 AM |
#19 |
 -
Do you think he voted for it on PRINCIPLE, or did he go along to get along?? n/t |
cherokeeprogressive |
Aug-11-10 01:23 AM |
#22 |
 -
Somewhere in the middle of the two. |
PBS Poll-435 |
Aug-11-10 01:28 AM |
#24 |
 -
Personally... |
ElectricLightDem |
Aug-11-10 10:18 AM |
#40 |
 -
You should really read what Kucinich wrote about his decision to vote for the bill. |
John Q. Citizen |
Aug-12-10 12:15 AM |
#72 |
 -
But Obama couldn't be bothered to lobby the likes of LIebermann for a public option |
eridani |
Aug-11-10 03:22 AM |
#27 |
  -
You and I know that the votes were not there |
PBS Poll-435 |
Aug-11-10 08:45 AM |
#31 |
   -
Kucinich's vote "wasn't there" until his arm was twisted |
eridani |
Aug-11-10 03:12 PM |
#49 |
  -
Problem was the Senate. Kucinich is a Rep. in the House |
PBS Poll-435 |
Aug-11-10 03:25 PM |
#51 |
  -
No, he wasn't. He didn't the first time. Not sure what he got threatened with |
eridani |
Aug-11-10 03:41 PM |
#54 |
  -
In the end, after all of the talk, he voted for the final bill |
PBS Poll-435 |
Aug-11-10 03:47 PM |
#55 |
  -
That is pure crap. If Obama had been hands on with the public option from the start |
eridani |
Aug-11-10 04:00 PM |
#59 |
  -
Disagree entirely. There are a handful of Democrats in the Senate that NEVER would have |
PBS Poll-435 |
Aug-11-10 04:03 PM |
#61 |
  -
Not even if their disctricts were threatened with being screwn legislatively? n/t |
eridani |
Aug-11-10 04:18 PM |
#62 |
  -
US Senators do not have districts. They represent States. |
PBS Poll-435 |
Aug-11-10 04:30 PM |
#63 |
  -
Bush did his very best to screw states that voted against him |
eridani |
Aug-11-10 05:29 PM |
#64 |
  -
Are there more or less Democrats in the Senate (from the South) now than there were in 1992? |
PBS Poll-435 |
Aug-11-10 05:34 PM |
#65 |
  -
Why would Obama lobby for a PO when he never wanted a PO? |
NorthCarolina |
Aug-11-10 09:01 AM |
#36 |
 -
EXACTLY - he never wanted one. |
kath |
Aug-11-10 03:37 PM |
#52 |
 -
Health Insurance Industry Executives Make Millions As |
Cherchez la Femme |
Aug-11-10 11:36 AM |
#42 |
-
Again |
PBS Poll-435 |
Aug-11-10 03:38 PM |
#53 |
-
I didn't read it that way. |
Radical Activist |
Aug-11-10 01:20 AM |
#20 |
-
Straight Up - Yes. N/T |
cherokeeprogressive |
Aug-11-10 01:22 AM |
#21 |
-
I just said that yesterday, I'm prescient |
sandnsea |
Aug-11-10 01:24 AM |
#23 |
-
Hey, everybody loves to punch hippies, am I right? C' mon...right |
TheKentuckian |
Aug-11-10 04:24 AM |
#29 |
-
I think he was slammin' |
lillypaddle |
Aug-11-10 06:54 AM |
#30 |
-
It was a slam against Kucinich's followers. |
liquid diamond |
Aug-11-10 08:47 AM |
#32 |
-
Let me start to answer by saying that I am in the "I love Dennis .... but" camp. |
Stinky The Clown |
Aug-11-10 08:53 AM |
#34 |
 -
So attacking one of your own party who is running for re-election is appropriate? |
KoKo |
Aug-11-10 09:09 AM |
#37 |
  -
Please don't misinterpret me. I am in no way defending Gibbs |
Stinky The Clown |
Aug-11-10 10:13 AM |
#39 |
 -
surprising that you have a but in re to dk..he speaks for me |
xiamiam |
Aug-11-10 06:59 PM |
#70 |
-
I can't figure out why Gibbs made the statement. |
guardian |
Aug-11-10 10:13 AM |
#38 |
 -
DLC has always attacked progressives. |
Individualist |
Aug-11-10 12:03 PM |
#44 |
-
Sure did |
Cherchez la Femme |
Aug-11-10 11:32 AM |
#41 |
-
If Dennis is as irrelevant as the status quo pretends, |
LWolf |
Aug-11-10 12:02 PM |
#43 |
-
YES! without a question! eom |
flyarm |
Aug-11-10 02:03 PM |
#46 |
-
that wasn't a slam against Kucinich |
Whisp |
Aug-11-10 02:06 PM |
#47 |
-
It did. See what cooperating with this White House gets you? If you're a right winger |
Raineyb |
Aug-11-10 02:10 PM |
#48 |
-
"Even electing a peacenik like Kucinich wouldn't satisfy some. |
laureloak |
Aug-11-10 03:20 PM |
#50 |
-
THe White House is clearly butthurt over left-leaning criticism |
jgraz |
Aug-11-10 03:50 PM |
#56 |
-
Gibbs has a strange way of showing respect. |
unapatriciated |
Aug-11-10 03:55 PM |
#57 |
-
Worse it was a slam at Dennis's supporters |
Bluenorthwest |
Aug-11-10 05:40 PM |
#66 |
-
I think it was demeaning. |
fogonthelake |
Aug-11-10 05:45 PM |
#67 |
-
No, unless you consider calling Kucinich the most liberal of the liberal a slam. |
phleshdef |
Aug-11-10 05:46 PM |
#68 |
-
Yes it is. |
Stuart G |
Aug-11-10 06:31 PM |
#69 |
-
No. But his point is well taken. |
Schema Thing |
Aug-11-10 10:01 PM |
#71 |
-
Interesting to see that a writer at The Nation also thought the Kucinich crack was out of line: |
kath |
Aug-12-10 12:27 AM |
#73 |