You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #129: And the "executive order" was redundant to the wording in the bill and current law [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-10 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #103
129. And the "executive order" was redundant to the wording in the bill and current law
It did nothing. It was political cover for Stupak, a meaningless "executive order"

Also, you're actually making one of my points. He did that, why exactly? Oh, yes. To get the damn bill passed - a bill that was actually possible to pass. Which bolsters my arguments that futilely fighting the Hyde Amendment would have hurt our ability to get HCR passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC