You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: A questioner asks [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. A questioner asks

"You said that all belief is actually a cover up for security, is that correct?"

Deepak "Yes"

"Do you believe that?"

Deepak "Yes"

The questioner returns to his seat as the audience laughs. Deepak appears not to get the joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Deepak Chopra gets owned bik0  Aug-02-10 08:24 PM   #0 
  - lulz  HiFructosePronSyrup   Aug-02-10 08:27 PM   #1 
  - Guru say..........  breadandwine   Aug-03-10 02:31 AM   #32 
  - Bwahahahahh! Thanks for that!  BeHereNow   Aug-02-10 08:28 PM   #2 
  - Anyone who makes money off poor, sad people...  JuniperLea   Aug-02-10 08:30 PM   #4 
     - The guy who held the phony sweat lodge comes to mind.  BeHereNow   Aug-02-10 08:38 PM   #8 
        - That is a prime example alright...  JuniperLea   Aug-02-10 08:43 PM   #9 
  - OK.. That was really really lovely!  annabanana   Aug-02-10 08:29 PM   #3 
  - OH! Can I steal to crosspost in the Atheist/Agnostics group?  Lisa0825   Aug-02-10 08:31 PM   #5 
  - His belief about belief may be a cover-up for insecurity too, but that doesn't mean that the probabi  patrice   Aug-02-10 08:31 PM   #6 
  - The unknown knowns...  BeHereNow   Aug-02-10 08:36 PM   #7 
  - Reminds me of Palin dressed word salad.  GoneOffShore   Aug-02-10 09:27 PM   #15 
     - The point is that insecurity has nothing to do with probable validity.  patrice   Aug-02-10 09:38 PM   #17 
        - ? ??????  GoneOffShore   Aug-02-10 09:45 PM   #21 
           - It IS possible to be insecure and right. It is also possible to be insecure and wrong. And  patrice   Aug-02-10 10:04 PM   #25 
  - I can't believe it...  JuniperLea   Aug-02-10 08:44 PM   #10 
  - I hope Patrice has a sense of humor...  BeHereNow   Aug-02-10 08:47 PM   #11 
     - Me too...  JuniperLea   Aug-02-10 09:22 PM   #14 
        - None taken.  patrice   Aug-02-10 09:41 PM   #18 
           - Whew! Thanks for understanding and having a sense of humor!  BeHereNow   Aug-02-10 09:43 PM   #20 
           - Though the basic assumptions are serious, I was really just sort of playing around with the concept.  patrice   Aug-02-10 09:46 PM   #22 
           - Hahahaha!  JuniperLea   Aug-03-10 10:50 AM   #33 
  - Your hypothesis may be wrong, but there is a probability that it is correct.  postulater   Aug-02-10 08:48 PM   #12 
  - It is simply one of those known unknowns...  BeHereNow   Aug-02-10 08:51 PM   #13 
  - I know you think you understand...  Wounded Bear   Aug-03-10 12:06 AM   #29 
  - delete....dupe. Sorry  Wounded Bear   Aug-03-10 12:06 AM   #30 
  - What?  Ramulux   Aug-02-10 09:30 PM   #16 
  - i agree. Reminds me of smart ass freshman who just discovered Libertarianism  Jigglebilly   Aug-03-10 06:48 PM   #35 
     - For real  Ramulux   Aug-03-10 11:04 PM   #37 
  - I can't seem to access the video  wildflower   Aug-02-10 09:42 PM   #19 
  - A questioner asks  grantcart   Aug-02-10 09:46 PM   #23 
     - I see, thank you. n/t  wildflower   Aug-02-10 09:53 PM   #24 
     - yeah, but all spiritual expressions are flawed signposts--propositional language fails  zazen   Aug-02-10 10:32 PM   #26 
  - That man is a snake oil salesman who should be in jail for his quantum quackery.  Odin2005   Aug-02-10 11:52 PM   #27 
  - You're damned right he is.  PanoramaIsland   Aug-02-10 11:59 PM   #28 
  - by all means  BuddhaGirl   Aug-03-10 07:03 PM   #36 
  - Great video. (n/t)  spin   Aug-03-10 02:01 AM   #31 
  - what were they talking about ? i thought Deepak was a "believer"  JI7   Aug-03-10 06:42 PM   #34 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC