You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #96: Does a dead dolphin get devoured by sharks? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-30-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #92
96. Does a dead dolphin get devoured by sharks?
I think so. They are their only natural enemies. And BP was counting on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Florida DEP finds no detectable oil along coastline DCBob  Jul-30-10 06:46 AM   #0 
  - i godda bridge...  Hannah Bell   Jul-30-10 06:47 AM   #1 
  - keep it.. nobody is interested..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 06:51 AM   #2 
     - evidentally someone is.....you, for starters...  Hannah Bell   Jul-30-10 06:55 AM   #5 
     - its called biology dear..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 07:01 AM   #9 
        - it's called corporate pr, "dear"  Hannah Bell   Jul-30-10 07:04 AM   #11 
        - yeah...cause no one else can go test it... n/t  ProdigalJunkMail   Jul-30-10 07:05 AM   #13 
        - If you believe  dipsydoodle   Jul-30-10 07:29 AM   #27 
           - i think someone on the coast who can actually verify  ProdigalJunkMail   Jul-30-10 07:33 AM   #30 
        - you didnt even read the article did you?  DCBob   Jul-30-10 07:11 AM   #16 
        - keep smokin the good stuff.  zonkers   Jul-30-10 08:48 AM   #61 
        - i'm v. excited by this news  pitohui   Jul-30-10 02:34 PM   #136 
     - Nothing to see here, just move along, eh, Bob? NOAA disagrees with you.  leveymg   Jul-30-10 07:10 AM   #15 
        - There are still plenty of issues and potential environmental problems but clearly its not as bad..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 07:12 AM   #17 
        - And, no doubt, we'll find out the long-term effects are FAR WORSE that some are claiming.  leveymg   Jul-30-10 07:19 AM   #20 
        - Do you have evidence/reports that support you claim about the "damage underwater"?  DCBob   Jul-30-10 07:28 AM   #26 
           - After the Exxon Valdez accident, follow-up tests showed that 30 percent of the oil remained on the  leveymg   Jul-30-10 07:43 AM   #36 
              - of course the Gulf is not Alaska but I am sure there will be some long term effects..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 07:57 AM   #38 
                 - which you are basing on observations made 600 miles away  CreekDog   Jul-30-10 12:34 PM   #93 
        - you grant that things are bad in one message out of 20  CreekDog   Jul-30-10 11:39 AM   #72 
        - Really? Can you tell me how many..."sea mammals" were killed?  Cetacea   Jul-30-10 12:00 PM   #84 
        - the closest point on the FL coast to the spill site  ProdigalJunkMail   Jul-30-10 07:14 AM   #18 
           - As I said immediately above:  leveymg   Jul-30-10 07:25 AM   #24 
              - indeed...  ProdigalJunkMail   Jul-30-10 07:27 AM   #25 
                 - 30 precent settled to the bottom. The rest has evaporated or is still dispersed in the water  leveymg   Jul-30-10 07:38 AM   #34 
                    - So you dismiss the effect of microorganisms? Most scientists would disagree with you.  DCBob   Jul-30-10 08:09 AM   #42 
                       - Before you celebrate Gulf algae growth, read below about red tides, hypoxia, and dead zones.  leveymg   Jul-30-10 08:27 AM   #50 
                          - so is there a red tide in the Gulf??  DCBob   Jul-30-10 08:30 AM   #52 
                             - The Gulf has a huge hypoxic dead zone, now much more so.  leveymg   Jul-30-10 09:58 AM   #66 
                                - Here's link to a map of current areas of "dead zones".. they are no where near the spill site..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 11:21 AM   #70 
                                   - and you are posting about places 600 miles away as evidence that things aren't so bad  CreekDog   Jul-30-10 12:41 PM   #95 
                                   - Do you have any evidence to support your claims of "dead zones" near the spill site?  DCBob   Jul-30-10 12:52 PM   #101 
                                      - do you have evidence to say that the oil spill site was not negatively impacted?  CreekDog   Jul-30-10 12:55 PM   #103 
                                         - of course it was negatively impacted.. any idiot knows that.. you are claiming "dead zones"..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 12:58 PM   #104 
                                            - there are dead zones in the Gulf  CreekDog   Jul-30-10 01:01 PM   #107 
                                            - you are making the "extraordinary claim" of "dead zones" near the well.  DCBob   Jul-30-10 01:04 PM   #109 
                                               - actually i'm not  CreekDog   Jul-30-10 01:09 PM   #110 
                                               - Ok. I give up.. but lets wait and see what comes back from the next sampling by Dr Joye's team..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 01:13 PM   #111 
                                               - YES! Wait and see the oxygen data before you declare that it's not so bad  CreekDog   Jul-30-10 01:18 PM   #112 
                                               - never mind.. you are hopeless.. I suspect you will be trashing Dr Joye..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 01:20 PM   #114 
                                               - not hopeless, it's my hope that people can see through your arguments  CreekDog   Jul-30-10 01:24 PM   #117 
                                            - but you are making just a few posts admitting that it's a disaster  CreekDog   Jul-30-10 01:22 PM   #115 
                                   - There have been a slew of articles on the recent expansion of Gulf dead zones  leveymg   Jul-30-10 01:32 PM   #120 
                                      - I am talking about reports of measurements since the gusher was capped..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 01:37 PM   #121 
                                         - Here's a CBS reference to Dead Zone from 07/28:  leveymg   Jul-30-10 02:18 PM   #128 
                                            - The report says: "One worry? So-called undersea dead zones where oil starves oxygen from the water"  DCBob   Jul-30-10 02:25 PM   #134 
                                               - Here's a better article in Nature (07/27) - substantial disagreement about latest data  leveymg   Jul-30-10 02:48 PM   #139 
                                                  - interesting article. yes, even the scientists are disagreeing..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 03:12 PM   #144 
  - This is really weird to me; have they skimmed the bottom?  babylonsister   Jul-30-10 06:52 AM   #3 
  - The article doesnt say.. but there was another article yesterday that mentioned they found no oil..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 06:58 AM   #6 
  - Sounds way too 'convenient' for me. nt  babylonsister   Jul-30-10 06:59 AM   #8 
  - Its bit hard to imagine a massive conspiracy here with state & fed scientists faking test results...  DCBob   Jul-30-10 07:05 AM   #12 
  - ALL that oil has been consumed by microorganisms in a matter of weeks?  eowyn_of_rohan   Jul-30-10 07:02 AM   #10 
     - read this and you tell me..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 07:06 AM   #14 
        - you beat me to it - i read this after I posted & just edited my post. to reflect that  eowyn_of_rohan   Jul-30-10 07:17 AM   #19 
           - I hear ya. There has to be some long term negative impact considering the massive amount of oil..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 07:23 AM   #23 
              - what ABOUT the animals?  eowyn_of_rohan   Jul-30-10 08:23 AM   #47 
                 - Dead fish, dolphins, turtles,etc. would float to the surface and would be obvious..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 08:31 AM   #54 
                    - not true - plenty was written about this back in May & June  eowyn_of_rohan   Jul-30-10 08:46 AM   #59 
                    - Quite alot of dead fish were reported washing ashore back in May and June but none recently.. afaik.  DCBob   Jul-30-10 11:13 AM   #69 
                       - My guess is that everything was and is DEAD-nothing to wash to shore.  eowyn_of_rohan   Jul-30-10 11:44 AM   #76 
                       - My guess is that you are wrong...  DCBob   Jul-30-10 11:48 AM   #79 
                          - You think dolphins are swimming around there?  eowyn_of_rohan   Jul-30-10 12:27 PM   #91 
                             - Does a wild dolphin pee in the Gulf?  DCBob   Jul-30-10 12:34 PM   #92 
                                - Does a dead dolphin get devoured by sharks?  Cetacea   Jul-30-10 12:42 PM   #96 
                                - now you're being silly - guess that means you're out of ammo  eowyn_of_rohan   Jul-30-10 12:42 PM   #97 
                                   - out of patience..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 12:52 PM   #102 
                       - And quite a lot of "sea mammals" weren't reported  Cetacea   Jul-30-10 11:56 AM   #83 
                    - They are not dolphins. They are "sea mammals". Media 101  Cetacea   Jul-30-10 12:03 PM   #86 
                       - What are you talking about?  DCBob   Jul-30-10 12:14 PM   #90 
                       - Nice pictures. Try googling news reports.  Cetacea   Jul-30-10 12:40 PM   #94 
                       - why do you think there are only 2 species of mammal in the gulf? therre are 28 species  pitohui   Jul-30-10 02:42 PM   #137 
                          - Because they are all dolphins and whales. And a wayward manatee or two  Cetacea   Jul-30-10 03:20 PM   #145 
  - Next we wil hear that the oil spill actually improved the oceans. This is total BS.  zonkers   Jul-30-10 08:55 AM   #63 
  - Remember that the EPA told us the air was safe in NYC after 9/11  Fumesucker   Jul-30-10 06:55 AM   #4 
  - Wasn't a report posted on DU that Corexit was in the water mix in the Keys & on Fl's SE. Coast?  Mika   Jul-30-10 06:58 AM   #7 
  - It isn't that hard to believe (despite the doomers) I mean think about it.  Statistical   Jul-30-10 07:21 AM   #21 
  - yeah, that's what the scientists are saying, but the gloom and doomers dont like it.  DCBob   Jul-30-10 07:30 AM   #28 
  - ftr, I'm not a doom and gloomer and hope this is accurate.  babylonsister   Jul-30-10 07:32 AM   #29 
  - I know you are not.. and I was not referring to you...  DCBob   Jul-30-10 07:34 AM   #32 
  - i thought the worst oil spill in this hemisphere ever was reason for doom and gloom.  CreekDog   Jul-30-10 10:59 AM   #68 
  - Thanks for the thread.  Cetacea   Jul-30-10 12:08 PM   #89 
  - That's misleading. Oil doesn't naturally gush at a rate of 100,000 bbls/day from a particular site.  leveymg   Jul-30-10 07:34 AM   #31 
  - so where's all the dead stuff and oiled beaches many were predicting?  DCBob   Jul-30-10 08:00 AM   #39 
  - Here's oil on Pensacola beach..  Fumesucker   Jul-30-10 08:06 AM   #41 
  - those vids are more than a month old.. the gusher was still gushing then..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 08:10 AM   #43 
     - And the oil has all miraculously disappeared?  Fumesucker   Jul-30-10 08:24 AM   #48 
        - I dont know about "miraculously", but yes, it disappeared..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 08:28 AM   #51 
           - There's nothing to debate, the EPA's lies are a matter of record..  Fumesucker   Jul-30-10 08:35 AM   #56 
  - you keep moving the goalposts to focus on one aspect of environmental damage  CreekDog   Jul-30-10 11:30 AM   #71 
  - Nobody said anything about it not being toxic.  Statistical   Jul-30-10 08:03 AM   #40 
     - Those algal blooms aren't all that beneficial. Ever heard of red tides, hypoxia, and dead zones?  leveymg   Jul-30-10 08:16 AM   #44 
        - There is one big difference.  Statistical   Jul-30-10 08:27 AM   #49 
           - And, you think there's no nitrogen in crude oil?  leveymg   Jul-30-10 08:32 AM   #55 
              - No that wasn't the point.  Statistical   Jul-30-10 08:37 AM   #57 
  - I've been reading the same argument that falsely compares this oil spill to natural seeps  CreekDog   Jul-30-10 11:52 AM   #81 
  - once this is pointed out, yes, it does seem logical  pitohui   Jul-30-10 02:48 PM   #138 
  - apparently the oil was abducted by aliens  spanone   Jul-30-10 07:21 AM   #22 
  - Perhaps Cheney used his earthquake machine to open up a huge hole in the Gulf...  trotsky   Jul-30-10 07:36 AM   #33 
  - Someone call Arizona. n/t  Statistical   Jul-30-10 08:49 AM   #62 
  - LOL.  Cetacea   Jul-30-10 12:46 PM   #99 
  - It's all about the bribed people in charge picking the sample location upwind and away. (nt)  w4rma   Jul-30-10 07:39 AM   #35 
  - This is great news!  Stuckinthebush   Jul-30-10 07:57 AM   #37 
  - Read above about red tides, hypoxia, and the Gulf Dead Zone  leveymg   Jul-30-10 08:21 AM   #45 
  - Good news to coastal wildlife  Stuckinthebush   Jul-30-10 08:31 AM   #53 
  - This is very interesting  NoNothing   Jul-30-10 08:22 AM   #46 
  - Very good idea.  Statistical   Jul-30-10 08:40 AM   #58 
  - "Selectively bred . . . with shorter lifespan" - sounds like the subplot to "Blade Runner"  leveymg   Jul-30-10 08:55 AM   #64 
  - i heard plans for growing oil-eating bacteria in the 1980s  pitohui   Jul-30-10 02:52 PM   #141 
  - There are indeed microbes used for that purpose.  TZ   Jul-30-10 11:46 AM   #77 
  - I'm very skeptical about evolution happening yet.  TZ   Jul-30-10 11:43 AM   #75 
     - No, evolution of microbes in the gulf over a long period  Stuckinthebush   Jul-30-10 11:54 AM   #82 
        - More efficient still does NOT mean that they are perfectly evolved for this situation  TZ   Jul-30-10 12:07 PM   #88 
           - Of course it took time.  Statistical   Jul-30-10 12:47 PM   #100 
           - hopefully the sea life can "hold their breath" until the temporary reduction of oxygen passes  CreekDog   Jul-30-10 01:00 PM   #105 
           - This is not a situation that has occured in thousands of years though  TZ   Jul-30-10 02:07 PM   #124 
              - Yet the evidence right now suggests a rather rapid recovery  Stuckinthebush   Jul-30-10 02:13 PM   #126 
                 - In some ways, yes..  Cetacea   Jul-30-10 04:18 PM   #155 
           - Perhaps I'm not being clear  Stuckinthebush   Jul-30-10 02:10 PM   #125 
  - It's probably all submerged because of the dispersents.  Odin2005   Jul-30-10 08:47 AM   #60 
  - That doens't mean that the water isn't dangerously polluted  rocktivity   Jul-30-10 09:04 AM   #65 
  - millions of gallons of oil remain below-MSM living in "parallel universe"  eowyn_of_rohan   Jul-30-10 10:46 AM   #67 
  - OKay I'll tell you one thing  TZ   Jul-30-10 11:39 AM   #73 
  - .  CreekDog   Jul-30-10 11:41 AM   #74 
  - !  TZ   Jul-30-10 11:46 AM   #78 
  - !!  QC   Jul-30-10 11:52 AM   #80 
  - !!!  City Lights   Jul-30-10 12:01 PM   #85 
  - bunch of nitwits !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  DCBob   Jul-30-10 12:04 PM   #87 
  - ROFL !! Perfect !  K Gardner   Jul-30-10 02:51 PM   #140 
  - I don't get it  sakabatou   Jul-30-10 03:24 PM   #146 
  - It's not "sky is falling" news, so nobody will believe you...  SidDithers   Jul-30-10 12:43 PM   #98 
  - Sid. Read my concerns with this news.  TZ   Jul-30-10 01:01 PM   #106 
  - The detection readings are what they are...  SidDithers   Jul-30-10 01:19 PM   #113 
     - Yes, I do truly think they are not detecting oil  TZ   Jul-30-10 02:02 PM   #122 
        - I'd wager that it is certainly not all gone  Stuckinthebush   Jul-30-10 02:15 PM   #127 
  - and absolutely no reason to question....all news is true  spanone   Jul-30-10 01:01 PM   #108 
  - Disinfo and bullshit is what they are feeding us. Don't believe it people!  earth mom   Jul-30-10 01:24 PM   #116 
  - Good news for Florida what about the other States  BootinUp   Jul-30-10 01:24 PM   #118 
  - NASA time-lapse shows a decided southern trend  Cetacea   Jul-30-10 01:31 PM   #119 
  - Great! Let's all hear it for Charlie Crist's happy Corexit fish that will eat through our kidneys  Catherina   Jul-30-10 02:05 PM   #123 
  - so its a massive conspiracy involving NOAA, EPA, FDA, universities, state agencies, etc, etc...  DCBob   Jul-30-10 02:20 PM   #131 
     - Anything for money  Catherina   Jul-30-10 03:47 PM   #148 
        - So you really do believe this is a massive conspiracy across multiple organizations..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 03:58 PM   #150 
           - Dedicated thread with links  Cetacea   Jul-30-10 04:15 PM   #153 
           - Wow indeed. If it comes from DC, it must be true eh? n/t  Catherina   Jul-30-10 04:17 PM   #154 
  - "Has not developed into a megadisaster".. ??? That's sarcasm, right?  K Gardner   Jul-30-10 02:20 PM   #129 
  - no.  DCBob   Jul-30-10 02:21 PM   #132 
  - The deep-water pollution will show up in "other ways"  SoCalDem   Jul-30-10 02:20 PM   #130 
  - It amazes me when people have no clue they are being lied to.  asdjrocky   Jul-30-10 02:23 PM   #133 
  - It amazes me when people simply ignore science when it does not fit their opinion.  DCBob   Jul-30-10 02:30 PM   #135 
     - it's not scientific to say "prove it to me" on something that has an established causal link  CreekDog   Jul-30-10 02:55 PM   #142 
     - Opinion here, like current scientific opinion, appears to be split on critical issues - see above  leveymg   Jul-30-10 02:56 PM   #143 
  - bump for BS  eowyn_of_rohan   Jul-30-10 03:36 PM   #147 
  - your bump is BS..  DCBob   Jul-30-10 03:54 PM   #149 
     - oh, you must be rested up  eowyn_of_rohan   Jul-30-10 05:26 PM   #156 
  - I am not sure folks understand this is FLORIDA  BootinUp   Jul-30-10 03:59 PM   #151 
     - good. maybe all these doom loonies will chill out now...  DCBob   Jul-30-10 04:02 PM   #152 
        - so you're saying that the lack of surface oil observed off Florida  CreekDog   Jul-30-10 06:23 PM   #157 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC