You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #44: Gallatin National Forest land, to be precise, close to the Yellowstone boundary. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-10 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
44. Gallatin National Forest land, to be precise, close to the Yellowstone boundary.
Edited on Thu Jul-29-10 05:23 PM by Gormy Cuss
It was a very weird bear attack. The three people who were attacked weren't camping in close proximity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Here's what we know about the Mama Grizzly attack joeybee12  Jul-29-10 04:03 PM   #0 
  - One was in her sleeping bag.  geek tragedy   Jul-29-10 04:05 PM   #1 
  - Again, you are wrong...it wasn't a National park, they say it was "near" and having  joeybee12   Jul-29-10 04:06 PM   #4 
  - Gallatin National Forest land, to be precise, close to the Yellowstone boundary.  Gormy Cuss   Jul-29-10 05:22 PM   #44 
  - FAIL. Improper storage of food is guaranteed to get a bear rummaging around  kestrel91316   Jul-29-10 04:07 PM   #8 
     - I will say that the food (according to sources) was stored properly...  joeybee12   Jul-29-10 04:09 PM   #11 
     - Three attacks in one short period of time indicates  geek tragedy   Jul-29-10 04:18 PM   #17 
        - Another assumption...  joeybee12   Jul-29-10 04:20 PM   #18 
  - Trying to start your own thread where your point isn't getting pummeled?  proteus_lives   Jul-29-10 04:06 PM   #2 
  - Try to not make sense again?  joeybee12   Jul-29-10 04:07 PM   #5 
     - Sense?  proteus_lives   Jul-29-10 04:08 PM   #10 
        - Good thing you laugh at your "jokes"  joeybee12   Jul-29-10 04:11 PM   #13 
           - Not laughing at my joke.  proteus_lives   Jul-29-10 04:15 PM   #14 
  - Crap, I thought it was a Palin thread.  REP   Jul-29-10 04:06 PM   #3 
  - When i saw the original thread, that was my first thought, too.  joeybee12   Jul-29-10 04:07 PM   #7 
  - You know, this was my first thought too.  Arkana   Jul-29-10 05:21 PM   #43 
  - I wouldn't want any like that on my jury!  hamsterjill   Jul-29-10 04:07 PM   #6 
  - I thought only one was killed?  Hassin Bin Sober   Jul-29-10 04:07 PM   #9 
  - Edited...thanks.  joeybee12   Jul-29-10 04:09 PM   #12 
  - Here's what he's ignoring here and on other threads.  proteus_lives   Jul-29-10 04:16 PM   #15 
  - Again, you are wrong, they ARE ASSUMMING unprovoked...  joeybee12   Jul-29-10 04:18 PM   #16 
     - Ok, sports-fan. I'll play.  proteus_lives   Jul-29-10 04:21 PM   #19 
     - Did you read my OP? I said there could have been nothing provioking her...  joeybee12   Jul-29-10 04:44 PM   #21 
        - Where are you getting yours?  proteus_lives   Jul-29-10 04:52 PM   #24 
           - Again, this didn't happen in Yellowstone...  joeybee12   Jul-29-10 05:01 PM   #27 
     - DUDE! You ALL are arguing about ASSUMPTIONS!  madinmaryland   Jul-29-10 05:13 PM   #37 
  - WTF?  Vinnie From Indy   Jul-29-10 04:43 PM   #20 
  - In less than a day they will have determined EVERYTHING about the incident...  joeybee12   Jul-29-10 04:45 PM   #22 
     - Well golly!  Vinnie From Indy   Jul-29-10 04:50 PM   #23 
        - Golly back!  joeybee12   Jul-29-10 04:57 PM   #26 
           - You seem to believe that the people tasked with responding to this  Vinnie From Indy   Jul-29-10 05:03 PM   #29 
              - Do you know any park rangers? under Bush, the vast majority of them  joeybee12   Jul-29-10 05:06 PM   #30 
  - Discussing things based on assumptions and limited information is par for the course  petronius   Jul-29-10 04:53 PM   #25 
  - I think bears are great...and if a bear dies needlessly, because rangers  joeybee12   Jul-29-10 05:02 PM   #28 
     - I think bears are great ,too, and I love seeing them in the wild  petronius   Jul-29-10 05:09 PM   #31 
        - Agreed...but as I wrote elsewhere, the vast majority of rangers are essentially  joeybee12   Jul-29-10 05:12 PM   #34 
  - At least one camper is reported to have been sighted the day before hiking and  yawnmaster   Jul-29-10 05:10 PM   #32 
  - You got a linkie to support your assertions?? Thanks, joey.  madinmaryland   Jul-29-10 05:10 PM   #33 
  - Read it all, mad, read it all...n/t  joeybee12   Jul-29-10 05:13 PM   #36 
     - Read all of what joey. There is no text in the body of your last post??  madinmaryland   Jul-29-10 05:14 PM   #39 
        - The whole thread ..all my posts...n/t  joeybee12   Jul-29-10 05:15 PM   #40 
           - Huh? I was just looking for a link to your assertions? Or are you just making assumptions?  madinmaryland   Jul-29-10 05:20 PM   #41 
  - Wow.  HiFructosePronSyrup   Jul-29-10 05:13 PM   #35 
  - That's high praise from you! Thanks!  joeybee12   Jul-29-10 05:13 PM   #38 
  - Hmmm. This isn't about Sarah Palin, is it? nt  bemildred   Jul-29-10 05:21 PM   #42 
  - Here's what I know about Soda Butte campground.  ejbrush   Jul-29-10 05:35 PM   #45 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC