You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #20: People who claim the right (actual or potential) to lead must be evaluated. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-14-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. People who claim the right (actual or potential) to lead must be evaluated.
Personal ridicule is NOT the objective. Their assumptions about themselves and others affect us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Romney's sons on why they won't enlist Beaverhausen  May-14-07 03:56 PM   #0 
  - Josh "feels guilty"??? Well, IT ISN"T TOO LATE YOU FUCKING CHICKENHAWK  karlrschneider   May-14-07 03:57 PM   #1 
  - So Mitt had to serve the Mormon church on a mission, and not his country?  Bluebear   May-14-07 03:59 PM   #2 
  - And THAT shows exactly where his priorities lie:  CanonRay   May-14-07 04:20 PM   #42 
  - Hell, I'm not even Mormon and I'd do a mission for them before the military  JVS   May-14-07 04:26 PM   #49 
  - The church gives you the option  FreeState   May-14-07 04:51 PM   #59 
  - But then again, you're not cheerleading for an ongoing war...  me b zola   May-14-07 10:36 PM   #80 
     - No way.  JVS   May-15-07 07:43 AM   #81 
  - Great list! nt  valerief   May-14-07 04:32 PM   #54 
  - Oh, but he wants to serve NOW. "Hail to the chief."  Buzz Clik   May-14-07 05:56 PM   #64 
  - "Where a lot is given a lot is expected. So we have to live up to that standard,"  tanyev   May-14-07 03:59 PM   #3 
  - Ding! Ding! Ding! - We have the rhetorical winner here!!  patrice   May-14-07 04:04 PM   #11 
  - He wasn't responding to the question of service  SteelPenguin   May-14-07 04:08 PM   #17 
     - oops  Beaverhausen   May-14-07 04:11 PM   #23 
     - Thank you for that correction.  patrice   May-14-07 04:17 PM   #38 
  - Leave the damn kids alone.  hnmnf   May-14-07 04:02 PM   #4 
  - But...but little Joshie feels guilty about not having served  Beaverhausen   May-14-07 04:03 PM   #7 
  - In this case, I think not.  Buzz Clik   May-14-07 04:04 PM   #8 
  - Apple. Tree. Measuring distance. Valuable data obtained thereby. nm  dicksteele   May-14-07 04:04 PM   #9 
  - Why? Love and support war, encourage your kids to join--if these  wienerdoggie   May-14-07 04:05 PM   #12 
  - Kids?!  Bluebear   May-14-07 04:09 PM   #19 
  - They are his children, aren't they?  hnmnf   May-14-07 04:11 PM   #24 
     - Adult kids = fair game. Wives = fair game.  wienerdoggie   May-14-07 04:14 PM   #31 
        - Wives Yes, Adult Kids, no  hnmnf   May-14-07 04:16 PM   #34 
           - I judge everybody on everything. That's how I get a handle on their  wienerdoggie   May-14-07 04:20 PM   #44 
           - So do you think Ron Reagan Jr. Represents the values that his father taught him?  hnmnf   May-14-07 04:21 PM   # 
              - Did you see the interview? Those "kids" are carbon copies of Mitt  Beaverhausen   May-14-07 04:23 PM   #46 
              - I'm not too familiar with him, to be honest--seen him on the dog shows, LOL!  wienerdoggie   May-14-07 04:25 PM   #48 
                 - He is the son of Ronald Reagan. Atheist and critic of the Bush Administration  hnmnf   May-14-07 04:29 PM   #52 
           - I agree totally as long as they turn away from the live microphones.  Buzz Clik   May-14-07 05:58 PM   #65 
           - His FIVE sons are CAMPAIGNING to get him into the WH.  fooj   May-14-07 08:53 PM   #77 
  - People who claim the right (actual or potential) to lead must be evaluated.  patrice   May-14-07 04:09 PM   #20 
  - Romney should be evaluated, not his children  hnmnf   May-14-07 04:10 PM   #21 
     - Let's see, did he raise them with his own chickenhawk values? Guess so!  wienerdoggie   May-14-07 04:11 PM   #26 
     - So what kind of parent you are has nothing to do with evaluating the man?  Bluebear   May-14-07 04:13 PM   #28 
        - No, it does.  hnmnf   May-14-07 04:14 PM   #32 
           - Well, Romney supports this bloodbath but not one of his sons has seen fit to serve.  Bluebear   May-14-07 04:16 PM   #36 
              - Hells bells! Even the royal family does their time in the military.  Buzz Clik   May-14-07 06:00 PM   #66 
  - One must pay to play.  jerryme1   May-14-07 04:19 PM   #40 
  - Nah  Forkboy   May-14-07 06:29 PM   #70 
  - 99% of the time I agree: leave families out of it. But the Romneys are part of a bigger problem.  Bucky   May-14-07 09:15 PM   #78 
  - Pardon me, folks. But these guys are sniveling douchebags.  Buzz Clik   May-14-07 04:02 PM   #5 
  - Pardon granted because your analysis is correct. nm  dicksteele   May-14-07 04:05 PM   #13 
  - They won't enlist because they are young republicans  BOSSHOG   May-14-07 04:03 PM   #6 
  - They served their country by attacking veterans who DID take bullets for them.  blm   May-14-07 04:04 PM   #10 
  - LOL! I'm sure Romney will pay the big bucks to have McCain (or Hagel, if he runs)  wienerdoggie   May-14-07 04:07 PM   #16 
  - I don't feel this is fair  SteelPenguin   May-14-07 04:06 PM   #14 
  - read their answers again  Beaverhausen   May-14-07 04:09 PM   #18 
  - I watched the interview  SteelPenguin   May-14-07 04:14 PM   #30 
     - It's not that you have to have served to support military action. But Mittster,  wienerdoggie   May-14-07 04:17 PM   #37 
     - That's a judgement though  SteelPenguin   May-14-07 04:41 PM   #58 
        - They support the war but don't serve.  IMModerate   May-14-07 06:04 PM   #67 
     - If your father is running for the position of Commander in Chief, it would matter  Beaverhausen   May-14-07 04:19 PM   #41 
     - So would mine probably  SteelPenguin   May-14-07 04:35 PM   #55 
     - I'm also not sure it's just about whether you can support military action  patrice   May-14-07 04:27 PM   #51 
     - well no, but your not running a pro iraq war presidential  NavyDavy   May-14-07 05:45 PM   #62 
     - It would only make you an asshole if you support the CURRENT military action.  karlrschneider   May-14-07 06:11 PM   #68 
  - Not ALL of us. nm  patrice   May-14-07 04:11 PM   #25 
  - Count me out of that fondness.  wienerdoggie   May-14-07 04:12 PM   #27 
  - But if one truly believes the USA and its citizens' lives are mortally threatened  jerryme1   May-14-07 04:24 PM   #47 
  - Exactly--that's because they know what the war is REALLY for, and it  wienerdoggie   May-14-07 04:26 PM   #50 
  - I hear this from chicken shit chicken hawks all the time.  tabasco   May-14-07 04:40 PM   #56 
  - Can you blame them?  youngdem   May-14-07 04:06 PM   #15 
  - Walk the walk--send other boys to fight and die for a noble cause,  wienerdoggie   May-14-07 04:11 PM   #22 
  - I'm not sure that it's about whether they should or shouldn't serve,  patrice   May-14-07 04:15 PM   #33 
  - At least Ben Romney gave an honest response to the question.  gatorboy   May-14-07 04:14 PM   #29 
  - There are "too many poor applicants filling up the spots in the military for them to join, anyway"  troubleinwinter   May-14-07 04:16 PM   #35 
  - OMG, that's just sick, if he fucking said that. There's ALWAYS room,  wienerdoggie   May-14-07 04:18 PM   #39 
     - He fucking said that.  troubleinwinter   May-14-07 04:20 PM   #43 
        - ASSHOLE!  wienerdoggie   May-14-07 04:21 PM   #45 
        - Link?  Liberal Jesus Freak   May-14-07 04:52 PM   #60 
  - They did mission work with their church? Is that the new deferment  The Backlash Cometh   May-14-07 04:32 PM   #53 
  - Not entieryly true of Mitt and his family to say that  FreeState   May-14-07 04:54 PM   #61 
  - It's not voluntary  Raine   May-14-07 08:35 PM   #73 
  - Mittens Kittens.  graywarrior   May-14-07 04:40 PM   #57 
  - Wouldn't it be nice if somebody like Clark went up against chicken hawk Romney?  WI_DEM   May-14-07 05:53 PM   #63 
  - So why don't they go to Iraq then? They raised the age limit!  EOO   May-14-07 06:11 PM   #69 
  - I begin to understand why Republicans are so big on supporting  Morgana LaFey   May-14-07 07:26 PM   #71 
  - That's a good point.  cat_girl25   May-14-07 08:41 PM   #75 
  - more pullshit from the elites. "I made other sacrifices". Yeah right.  ComerPerro   May-14-07 07:29 PM   #72 
  - From what I can gather, most young repugs think that they can support the war by ...  Blue State Native   May-14-07 08:39 PM   #74 
  - WHY does Mitt regret not being drafted  Raine   May-14-07 08:41 PM   #76 
  - I would like to know how "low" his number was when he got his college deferment n/t  NNN0LHI   May-15-07 08:28 AM   #83 
  - Not every young person needs to join the military.  smalll   May-14-07 09:25 PM   #79 
  - Mitt Romney can kiss my ass as far as I'm concerned.......  PRETZEL   May-15-07 08:25 AM   #82 
  - How does that happen?  Sentinel Chicken   May-15-07 08:42 AM   #84 
  - Their positions aren't an issue, unless they're supporting their Dad's campaign...  krkaufman   May-15-07 04:35 PM   #85 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC