You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: Because ethics is a foreign concept to most republicans. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
name not needed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Because ethics is a foreign concept to most republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  - Should Democrat Congressman Charlie Rangel Resign ? Parche  Jul-26-10 06:24 PM   #0 
  - No. Wait and see...there will be more smoke than fire here...nt  old mark   Jul-26-10 06:25 PM   #1 
  - Dittio. I will wait until thursday. If he's really guilty of all the  napi21   Jul-26-10 06:36 PM   #7 
  - Yes. n/t  H2O Man   Jul-26-10 06:26 PM   #2 
  - "Democrat" Congressman?  marmar   Jul-26-10 06:32 PM   #3 
  - that was my first reaction too.  Motown_Johnny   Jul-26-10 06:34 PM   #5 
  - +1. //nt  Overseas   Jul-26-10 07:37 PM   #17 
  - i know . . . SHEESH  datasuspect   Jul-26-10 06:47 PM   #10 
  - sure - when Ensign resigns. They can go hand in hand. n/t  Donnachaidh   Jul-26-10 06:32 PM   #4 
  - I'm still waiting for McCain to resign  MajorChode   Jul-26-10 07:09 PM   #13 
  - No, and it pains me to see the way the current administration will kick anyone under the bus.  McCamy Taylor   Jul-26-10 06:35 PM   #6 
  - Sure...but a better question to ask.  Old and In the Way   Jul-26-10 06:38 PM   #8 
  - Because ethics is a foreign concept to most republicans.  name not needed   Jul-26-10 06:59 PM   #12 
  - Its the sensible solution  Oregone   Jul-26-10 06:46 PM   #9 
  - Yes. Just because he's on our side doesn't mean he shouldn't be held accountable for his actions.  name not needed   Jul-26-10 06:58 PM   #11 
  - He is entitled to defend himself, no?  IndianaGreen   Jul-26-10 07:24 PM   #14 
     - He already copped to numerous ethics violations to the committee,  Joe Fields   Jul-26-10 07:34 PM   #15 
  - Certainly not before he's convicted of any wrong doing  TheCowsCameHome   Jul-26-10 07:36 PM   #16 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC