ProudDad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-16-10 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
Edited on Fri Jul-16-10 12:56 AM by ProudDad
But what I've said about what the Senate leadership CAN DO is absolutely correct.
Quit replying with bullshit and red herrings!
|
| -Why do people keep saying that Obama negotiates too much with Republicans? |
BzaDem |
Jul-15-10 11:29 PM |
#0 |
-
How many times did W get 60 votes? |
Hawkowl |
Jul-15-10 11:32 PM |
#1 |
 -
He got 60 or more votes on EVERY SINGLE non-reconciliation bill. |
BzaDem |
Jul-15-10 11:35 PM |
#2 |
  -
They don't need 60 votes! |
ProudDad |
Jul-16-10 12:52 AM |
#22 |
 -
Somehow, I think Bush would have privatized Social Security if he thought he didn't need 60 votes. |
BzaDem |
Jul-16-10 01:39 AM |
#30 |
 -
He couldn't get 51 votes to gut Social Security |
ProudDad |
Jul-16-10 01:36 PM |
#44 |
 -
bush didn't have an obstructionist opposition party to deal with |
fishwax |
Jul-16-10 12:24 AM |
#13 |
-
Bush did get 60+ on a number of votes (the Patriot Act and No Child Left Behind |
ProudDad |
Jul-16-10 12:47 AM |
#20 |
-
People who say that there is no difference between the parties are simply spoiled. |
BzaDem |
Jul-16-10 01:41 AM |
#31 |
-
I am one of those people you speak of |
Angry Dragon |
Jul-15-10 11:41 PM |
#3 |
 -
On HCR, he actually didn't get any Republican votes. |
BzaDem |
Jul-15-10 11:50 PM |
#4 |
-
It would seem that you and I will disagree |
Angry Dragon |
Jul-16-10 12:00 AM |
#6 |
-
Your post proves my point exactly. |
BzaDem |
Jul-16-10 12:11 AM |
#8 |
-
So if what you say is true |
Angry Dragon |
Jul-16-10 12:25 AM |
#14 |
 -
What have you been doing for the last several weeks? |
BzaDem |
Jul-16-10 12:33 AM |
#16 |
-
LOL- denying the cognitive science and failing to learn the lessons won't "make it stop" |
depakid |
Jul-16-10 12:35 AM |
#17 |
-
It is so funny to hear you blather on about "lessons" |
BzaDem |
Jul-16-10 12:44 AM |
#18 |
 -
One thing you've proven- |
depakid |
Jul-16-10 03:53 AM |
#41 |
-
+1000 nt |
laughingliberal |
Jul-16-10 01:50 AM |
#33 |
-
They haven't got anything good to complain about. |
HiFructosePronSyrup |
Jul-15-10 11:57 PM |
#5 |
-
We actually say more damning (and quite true) things than that- |
depakid |
Jul-16-10 12:09 AM |
#7 |
 -
Yup. Pretty much. |
aquart |
Jul-16-10 12:15 AM |
#9 |
  -
Yes, Obama would rather have a bill pass with a concession than have a bill fail without one. |
BzaDem |
Jul-16-10 12:18 AM |
#11 |
 -
My, isn't oversimplification a power choice. |
aquart |
Jul-16-10 12:59 AM |
#25 |
 -
Why do you think that there is any negotiation at all? |
BzaDem |
Jul-16-10 01:37 AM |
#29 |
 -
Some people think the President's job is to set narratives, rather than to actually change anything. |
BzaDem |
Jul-16-10 12:15 AM |
#10 |
-
"These people" are by far the majority- and reflect how things work in real life |
depakid |
Jul-16-10 12:21 AM |
#12 |
 -
No, actually, they aren't. |
BzaDem |
Jul-16-10 12:28 AM |
#15 |
-
Yes, actually they are, and everybody goddamn well knows it. |
Jim Sagle |
Jul-16-10 01:50 AM |
#34 |
-
Your "everybody" = about 15 percent of Liberal Democrats. |
BzaDem |
Jul-16-10 01:53 AM |
#35 |
-
More DLC hogwash from you. |
Jim Sagle |
Jul-16-10 02:42 AM |
#38 |
-
Some people think that the pResident's job is to |
ProudDad |
Jul-16-10 12:57 AM |
#24 |
-
We were promised CHANGE, not "narrative." |
aquart |
Jul-16-10 01:00 AM |
#26 |
-
And you got it. Just because you deny it doesn't mean you didn't get it. |
BzaDem |
Jul-16-10 01:19 AM |
#27 |
-
He campaigned against mandates and then reversed himself after the election. |
Jim Sagle |
Jul-16-10 02:39 AM |
#37 |
-
Yes there is something you are missing... |
ProudDad |
Jul-16-10 12:45 AM |
#19 |
 -
Obama could also bypass Congress and legislate by fiat. |
BzaDem |
Jul-16-10 12:48 AM |
#21 |
-
No, he can't |
ProudDad |
Jul-16-10 12:55 AM |
#23 |
-
No, he actually can't do what you are proposing (even if you repeat yourself many times). |
BzaDem |
Jul-16-10 01:25 AM |
#28 |
-
You need to brush up on your reading and comprehension skills... |
ProudDad |
Jul-16-10 01:43 PM |
#45 |
-
This post should have come with Dramamine. nt |
laughingliberal |
Jul-16-10 01:48 AM |
#32 |
-
Um... because Obama negotiates too much with Republicans? |
jgraz |
Jul-16-10 02:28 AM |
#36 |
 -
The sentence isn't hard to understand -- it's simpy not true. |
BzaDem |
Jul-16-10 03:00 AM |
#39 |
-
That reasoning is silly beyond description |
jgraz |
Jul-16-10 04:52 AM |
#42 |
-
Conservadems were fellated, single payer activists were jailed. |
Jim Sagle |
Jul-16-10 10:31 AM |
#43 |
-
"Or is there another part of this argument that I'm missing?" |
upi402 |
Jul-16-10 03:24 AM |
#40 |