Urban Prairie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-17-10 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #88 |
|
Exactly, make those suffering the most believe that it is the current administration, and not the global corporate capitalists, and their lackey Republicans in Congress, the latter who incredulously also get recognition and awards based the amount of outsourcing that they do.
|
| -Tax Cuts for the Rich Do not Create Jobs, You Right Wing Idiot Corporate Ass Kissers! |
McCamy Taylor |
Jul-14-10 12:36 PM |
#0 |
-
We all know that Republicans are using this downturn |
Lifelong Protester |
Jul-14-10 12:40 PM |
#1 |
 -
The Bush tax cuts were the single largest contributor to the deficit and no jobs were created |
bjobotts |
Jul-14-10 09:28 PM |
#41 |
  -
Extending unemploment benefits adds $30 billion to deficit; Bush tax cuts adds $678 billion |
bjobotts |
Jul-14-10 09:40 PM |
#42 |
   -
Republican deficit reduction is complete hypocrisy. They only care about the wealthy not deficit |
bjobotts |
Jul-14-10 09:42 PM |
#43 |
  -
At the 2009 level the estate tax only affects 0.02% of the population but adds billions to deficit |
bjobotts |
Jul-14-10 09:44 PM |
#45 |
  -
If people feel the dems may disappoint, remember the alternative is 100Xs worse |
bjobotts |
Jul-14-10 10:08 PM |
#48 |
   -
agree a million times |
unpossibles |
Jul-15-10 09:57 AM |
#68 |
  -
I'm sorry....but, that is crap..... |
backtomn |
Jul-15-10 11:51 AM |
#77 |
  -
I've heard that shite before |
newspeak |
Jul-15-10 01:21 PM |
#82 |
  -
Agreed & Well Said |
Sherman A1 |
Jul-15-10 06:44 AM |
#63 |
  -
They invested their tax cuts in mortgage backed securites and derivatives resulting in the big bust! |
DailyGrind51 |
Jul-15-10 12:00 PM |
#80 |
 -
You know exactly where they were when those wars were ramping up |
jmowreader |
Jul-15-10 11:29 PM |
#85 |
-
If only I could recommend a thread more than once. n/t |
Toucano |
Jul-14-10 12:41 PM |
#2 |
 -
use my thread |
oberst steiner |
Jul-16-10 12:16 PM |
#91 |
-
Nonsense. It's an Ass Kisser Full Employment program. |
aquart |
Jul-14-10 12:43 PM |
#3 |
-
Demand creates jobs. Period. |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-14-10 12:45 PM |
#4 |
 -
Mmmm... Bubonic plague pasta! |
The_Commonist |
Jul-14-10 01:42 PM |
#11 |
  -
I like to say there actually is a real "trickle down economics", but it's not the Reaganite crap... |
JHB |
Jul-15-10 06:58 AM |
#65 |
 -
demand doesn't create jobs either. there a millions of people who want food, cars, |
Hannah Bell |
Jul-14-10 01:45 PM |
#12 |
-
Economically, want and demand aren't the same thing |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-14-10 02:08 PM |
#15 |
 -
in the common tongue, that distinction is murky, & this is a general forum, not a special economists |
Hannah Bell |
Jul-14-10 02:25 PM |
#17 |
-
In economic terms, the distinction is not murky at all |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-14-10 02:36 PM |
#18 |
 -
i understand the common use of the english language fine, thanks. & i understand |
Hannah Bell |
Jul-14-10 03:00 PM |
#25 |
  -
It's germaine to the discussion |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-14-10 04:05 PM |
#28 |
 -
i got it fine. it has an ambiguous meaning. my intention was not to "correct" you as though you |
Hannah Bell |
Jul-14-10 08:03 PM |
#39 |
 -
Everybody understands what the term "demand".. |
sendero |
Jul-14-10 09:53 PM |
#46 |
 -
if you say so. |
Hannah Bell |
Jul-14-10 10:28 PM |
#49 |
 -
I appreciate your effort.....but, |
backtomn |
Jul-15-10 11:55 AM |
#78 |
-
Certainly profit drives the system, as the reward for supplying a demand |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-17-10 09:39 PM |
#100 |
-
Your issue appears to be "Profit Margin" |
backtomn |
Jul-15-10 11:58 AM |
#79 |
-
you missed the point. your comments have nothing to do with anything i said. |
Hannah Bell |
Jul-16-10 04:07 AM |
#89 |
-
Good point, HB. |
OJones |
Jul-16-10 05:04 PM |
#93 |
-
What do they care? |
Dulcinea |
Jul-14-10 12:49 PM |
#5 |
 -
Indeed |
peace frog |
Jul-15-10 07:25 AM |
#66 |
-
Didn't the nit wits try this for 8 yeaars and ended up loosing more jobs then they ever created? |
mrcheerful |
Jul-14-10 12:50 PM |
#6 |
 -
Yeah, they were really lose with their money. |
deaniac21 |
Jul-14-10 02:40 PM |
#21 |
-
If tax cuts for the rich created jobs |
Sebastian Doyle |
Jul-14-10 12:52 PM |
#7 |
-
Actually, they probably do... |
Frisbee |
Jul-14-10 12:56 PM |
#8 |
-
And what do the unemployed have to look forward to? |
Rex |
Jul-14-10 12:58 PM |
#9 |
 -
FDR raised the tax rate on marginal income of $100,000 or more |
JDPriestly |
Jul-14-10 10:59 PM |
#53 |
-
absolutely |
NYMdaveNYI |
Jul-15-10 10:49 AM |
#72 |
-
They create jobs alright, in Asia! |
DailyGrind51 |
Jul-14-10 01:40 PM |
#10 |
-
Best Quote |
DonCoquixote |
Jul-14-10 01:59 PM |
#13 |
-
Meanwhile, the greedy CofC turds sit atop a $10 Trillion-plus mountain of cash. |
Octafish |
Jul-14-10 02:07 PM |
#14 |
 -
they are not "hoarding" that cash. that article complains they aren't letting banks "manage" it |
unblock |
Jul-14-10 10:41 PM |
#50 |
 -
But, but, but: If I vote republican, I can be rich to. |
howmad1 |
Jul-14-10 11:11 PM |
#55 |
-
Dumber than dirt. |
Enthusiast |
Jul-15-10 03:29 AM |
#59 |
-
Great points |
blueworld |
Jul-14-10 02:18 PM |
#16 |
-
Actually, they DO create jobs. In China and India. Not here. |
arbusto_baboso |
Jul-14-10 02:37 PM |
#19 |
-
Massive public spending creates jobs... |
Deep13 |
Jul-14-10 02:39 PM |
#20 |
-
Serious question. |
OnlinePoker |
Jul-14-10 02:45 PM |
#22 |
-
K&R |
me b zola |
Jul-14-10 02:49 PM |
#23 |
-
#1 reason it is clear we have significant internal issues that are serious roadblocks to any succes |
TheKentuckian |
Jul-14-10 02:55 PM |
#24 |
-
Kick n/t |
Toucano |
Jul-14-10 03:22 PM |
#26 |
-
Tax cuts for Wealthy (= supply side economics) is utter intellectual garbage |
on point |
Jul-14-10 03:24 PM |
#27 |
 -
Good suggestion. nt |
Enthusiast |
Jul-15-10 03:31 AM |
#60 |
-
Greedy, evil, LYING monsters. Why are they even ALLOWED to get away with this crap? |
inna |
Jul-14-10 04:29 PM |
#29 |
-
Tax cuts for the rich creates jobs for Congressmen. |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-14-10 04:36 PM |
#30 |
 -
They don't create Congressmen, they create slush funds for the Congressmen's campaigns. |
JDPriestly |
Jul-14-10 11:01 PM |
#54 |
-
Picking nits |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-15-10 10:18 AM |
#70 |
-
Would you prefer just conversing with yourself? |
JDPriestly |
Jul-16-10 01:37 AM |
#87 |
-
Ah. Another pointless observation |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-16-10 11:27 AM |
#90 |
-
Are you male? Women like to give each other feedback. |
JDPriestly |
Jul-16-10 03:19 PM |
#92 |
-
Are you a sexist? |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-16-10 06:23 PM |
#95 |
-
My post may have been superfluous but I can't understand why I offended you so. |
JDPriestly |
Jul-17-10 10:53 AM |
#96 |
-
You screwed up. |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-17-10 01:58 PM |
#97 |
-
To be very honest, I do not understand what you meant by your original |
JDPriestly |
Jul-17-10 07:31 PM |
#99 |
-
Please read at least the title of the OP. |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-17-10 10:30 PM |
#101 |
-
I thought I understood what you meant until you said I was disagreeing with you. |
JDPriestly |
Jul-18-10 12:42 AM |
#103 |
-
Good golly. |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-18-10 04:16 PM |
#104 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-14-10 04:41 PM |
#31 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-14-10 06:38 PM |
#38 |
-
Tax Rates vs Unemployment, by the numbers. |
GETPLANING |
Jul-14-10 04:46 PM |
#32 |
-
I wonder what you think |
INTMANOMYST |
Jul-14-10 05:24 PM |
#33 |
 -
Small business revenue is different than profit - you can have revenue |
haele |
Jul-15-10 03:17 PM |
#83 |
-
Thanks! |
INTMANOMYST |
Jul-16-10 12:21 AM |
#86 |
-
It is simply a veiled threat. Tax breaks or we cut you off. No jobs. No investment. |
bluerum |
Jul-14-10 05:37 PM |
#34 |
-
I'd like someone to explain how rich people "make jobs" when they get richer |
Canuckistanian |
Jul-14-10 05:56 PM |
#35 |
-
The underlying fiction is that the rich "create" wealth. |
Dr Morbius |
Jul-14-10 06:01 PM |
#36 |
-
K&R. I agree. Merde is the only thing that's trickled down. //nt |
Overseas |
Jul-14-10 06:29 PM |
#37 |
-
My dyed-in-the-wool Libertarian, mega-corporate attorney, spouse, a few months before he passed on, |
patrice |
Jul-14-10 08:05 PM |
#40 |
-
k & R |
donheld |
Jul-14-10 09:43 PM |
#44 |
-
"Why not give more money to those who create jobs?" |
johnaries |
Jul-14-10 09:55 PM |
#47 |
 -
in order for jobs to be created, supply AND demand need to be in balance with adequate capital |
unblock |
Jul-14-10 10:45 PM |
#51 |
-
If the Bush tax cuts had actually worked to create jobs we would have tons of jobs right now. |
livingonearth |
Jul-14-10 10:46 PM |
#52 |
-
30 years |
guitar man |
Jul-14-10 11:24 PM |
#56 |
 -
simply put, |
NYMdaveNYI |
Jul-15-10 10:37 AM |
#71 |
-
thanks for linking to that |
hfojvt |
Jul-15-10 01:53 AM |
#57 |
-
K&R |
Enthusiast |
Jul-15-10 03:23 AM |
#58 |
-
Jefferson's "thing of wax" nightmare had come to pass. |
Bryn |
Jul-15-10 03:55 AM |
#61 |
 -
Wow! |
OJones |
Jul-16-10 05:46 PM |
#94 |
-
it 's a false notion that tax cuts for the weathy results in job creation |
SemperEadem |
Jul-15-10 05:08 AM |
#62 |
-
Actual data |
quaker bill |
Jul-15-10 06:46 AM |
#64 |
 -
the problem is excess capacity |
dem mba |
Jul-15-10 12:33 PM |
#81 |
-
tax cuts |
530jonathan |
Jul-15-10 08:06 AM |
#67 |
 -
before Reagan, I believe the tax rate for the wealthy was about 66% |
newspeak |
Jul-15-10 11:07 AM |
#74 |
-
K & R X 10 |
lonestarnot |
Jul-15-10 09:59 AM |
#69 |
-
I don't mind taxes returning to their former state |
LatteLibertine |
Jul-15-10 10:56 AM |
#73 |
-
What tax cuts for the rich result in is more money for the rich, and less for the poor |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-15-10 11:16 AM |
#75 |
-
If anything, the last 30 years have taught us that Reaganomics was a failure |
KansDem |
Jul-15-10 11:25 AM |
#76 |
-
Honestly |
LatteLibertine |
Jul-15-10 03:23 PM |
#84 |
-
GOPers have NO INTENTION of increasing employment, nor do the big corporations. |
old mark |
Jul-16-10 02:10 AM |
#88 |
 -
+1 |
Urban Prairie |
Jul-17-10 02:27 PM |
#98 |
-
Kick for importance. |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-17-10 10:30 PM |
#102 |