Jakes Progress
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-15-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #54 |
|
doesn't add to the conversation. Saying the same thing a different way doesn't add to the conversation.
Why?
|
| -Tax Cuts for the Rich Do not Create Jobs, You Right Wing Idiot Corporate Ass Kissers! |
McCamy Taylor |
Jul-14-10 12:36 PM |
#0 |
-
We all know that Republicans are using this downturn |
Lifelong Protester |
Jul-14-10 12:40 PM |
#1 |
 -
The Bush tax cuts were the single largest contributor to the deficit and no jobs were created |
bjobotts |
Jul-14-10 09:28 PM |
#41 |
  -
Extending unemploment benefits adds $30 billion to deficit; Bush tax cuts adds $678 billion |
bjobotts |
Jul-14-10 09:40 PM |
#42 |
   -
Republican deficit reduction is complete hypocrisy. They only care about the wealthy not deficit |
bjobotts |
Jul-14-10 09:42 PM |
#43 |
  -
At the 2009 level the estate tax only affects 0.02% of the population but adds billions to deficit |
bjobotts |
Jul-14-10 09:44 PM |
#45 |
  -
If people feel the dems may disappoint, remember the alternative is 100Xs worse |
bjobotts |
Jul-14-10 10:08 PM |
#48 |
   -
agree a million times |
unpossibles |
Jul-15-10 09:57 AM |
#68 |
  -
I'm sorry....but, that is crap..... |
backtomn |
Jul-15-10 11:51 AM |
#77 |
  -
I've heard that shite before |
newspeak |
Jul-15-10 01:21 PM |
#82 |
  -
Agreed & Well Said |
Sherman A1 |
Jul-15-10 06:44 AM |
#63 |
  -
They invested their tax cuts in mortgage backed securites and derivatives resulting in the big bust! |
DailyGrind51 |
Jul-15-10 12:00 PM |
#80 |
 -
You know exactly where they were when those wars were ramping up |
jmowreader |
Jul-15-10 11:29 PM |
#85 |
-
If only I could recommend a thread more than once. n/t |
Toucano |
Jul-14-10 12:41 PM |
#2 |
 -
use my thread |
oberst steiner |
Jul-16-10 12:16 PM |
#91 |
-
Nonsense. It's an Ass Kisser Full Employment program. |
aquart |
Jul-14-10 12:43 PM |
#3 |
-
Demand creates jobs. Period. |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-14-10 12:45 PM |
#4 |
 -
Mmmm... Bubonic plague pasta! |
The_Commonist |
Jul-14-10 01:42 PM |
#11 |
  -
I like to say there actually is a real "trickle down economics", but it's not the Reaganite crap... |
JHB |
Jul-15-10 06:58 AM |
#65 |
 -
demand doesn't create jobs either. there a millions of people who want food, cars, |
Hannah Bell |
Jul-14-10 01:45 PM |
#12 |
-
Economically, want and demand aren't the same thing |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-14-10 02:08 PM |
#15 |
 -
in the common tongue, that distinction is murky, & this is a general forum, not a special economists |
Hannah Bell |
Jul-14-10 02:25 PM |
#17 |
-
In economic terms, the distinction is not murky at all |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-14-10 02:36 PM |
#18 |
 -
i understand the common use of the english language fine, thanks. & i understand |
Hannah Bell |
Jul-14-10 03:00 PM |
#25 |
  -
It's germaine to the discussion |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-14-10 04:05 PM |
#28 |
 -
i got it fine. it has an ambiguous meaning. my intention was not to "correct" you as though you |
Hannah Bell |
Jul-14-10 08:03 PM |
#39 |
 -
Everybody understands what the term "demand".. |
sendero |
Jul-14-10 09:53 PM |
#46 |
 -
if you say so. |
Hannah Bell |
Jul-14-10 10:28 PM |
#49 |
 -
I appreciate your effort.....but, |
backtomn |
Jul-15-10 11:55 AM |
#78 |
-
Certainly profit drives the system, as the reward for supplying a demand |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-17-10 09:39 PM |
#100 |
-
Your issue appears to be "Profit Margin" |
backtomn |
Jul-15-10 11:58 AM |
#79 |
-
you missed the point. your comments have nothing to do with anything i said. |
Hannah Bell |
Jul-16-10 04:07 AM |
#89 |
-
Good point, HB. |
OJones |
Jul-16-10 05:04 PM |
#93 |
-
What do they care? |
Dulcinea |
Jul-14-10 12:49 PM |
#5 |
 -
Indeed |
peace frog |
Jul-15-10 07:25 AM |
#66 |
-
Didn't the nit wits try this for 8 yeaars and ended up loosing more jobs then they ever created? |
mrcheerful |
Jul-14-10 12:50 PM |
#6 |
 -
Yeah, they were really lose with their money. |
deaniac21 |
Jul-14-10 02:40 PM |
#21 |
-
If tax cuts for the rich created jobs |
Sebastian Doyle |
Jul-14-10 12:52 PM |
#7 |
-
Actually, they probably do... |
Frisbee |
Jul-14-10 12:56 PM |
#8 |
-
And what do the unemployed have to look forward to? |
Rex |
Jul-14-10 12:58 PM |
#9 |
 -
FDR raised the tax rate on marginal income of $100,000 or more |
JDPriestly |
Jul-14-10 10:59 PM |
#53 |
-
absolutely |
NYMdaveNYI |
Jul-15-10 10:49 AM |
#72 |
-
They create jobs alright, in Asia! |
DailyGrind51 |
Jul-14-10 01:40 PM |
#10 |
-
Best Quote |
DonCoquixote |
Jul-14-10 01:59 PM |
#13 |
-
Meanwhile, the greedy CofC turds sit atop a $10 Trillion-plus mountain of cash. |
Octafish |
Jul-14-10 02:07 PM |
#14 |
 -
they are not "hoarding" that cash. that article complains they aren't letting banks "manage" it |
unblock |
Jul-14-10 10:41 PM |
#50 |
 -
But, but, but: If I vote republican, I can be rich to. |
howmad1 |
Jul-14-10 11:11 PM |
#55 |
-
Dumber than dirt. |
Enthusiast |
Jul-15-10 03:29 AM |
#59 |
-
Great points |
blueworld |
Jul-14-10 02:18 PM |
#16 |
-
Actually, they DO create jobs. In China and India. Not here. |
arbusto_baboso |
Jul-14-10 02:37 PM |
#19 |
-
Massive public spending creates jobs... |
Deep13 |
Jul-14-10 02:39 PM |
#20 |
-
Serious question. |
OnlinePoker |
Jul-14-10 02:45 PM |
#22 |
-
K&R |
me b zola |
Jul-14-10 02:49 PM |
#23 |
-
#1 reason it is clear we have significant internal issues that are serious roadblocks to any succes |
TheKentuckian |
Jul-14-10 02:55 PM |
#24 |
-
Kick n/t |
Toucano |
Jul-14-10 03:22 PM |
#26 |
-
Tax cuts for Wealthy (= supply side economics) is utter intellectual garbage |
on point |
Jul-14-10 03:24 PM |
#27 |
 -
Good suggestion. nt |
Enthusiast |
Jul-15-10 03:31 AM |
#60 |
-
Greedy, evil, LYING monsters. Why are they even ALLOWED to get away with this crap? |
inna |
Jul-14-10 04:29 PM |
#29 |
-
Tax cuts for the rich creates jobs for Congressmen. |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-14-10 04:36 PM |
#30 |
 -
They don't create Congressmen, they create slush funds for the Congressmen's campaigns. |
JDPriestly |
Jul-14-10 11:01 PM |
#54 |
-
Picking nits |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-15-10 10:18 AM |
#70 |
-
Would you prefer just conversing with yourself? |
JDPriestly |
Jul-16-10 01:37 AM |
#87 |
-
Ah. Another pointless observation |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-16-10 11:27 AM |
#90 |
-
Are you male? Women like to give each other feedback. |
JDPriestly |
Jul-16-10 03:19 PM |
#92 |
-
Are you a sexist? |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-16-10 06:23 PM |
#95 |
-
My post may have been superfluous but I can't understand why I offended you so. |
JDPriestly |
Jul-17-10 10:53 AM |
#96 |
-
You screwed up. |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-17-10 01:58 PM |
#97 |
-
To be very honest, I do not understand what you meant by your original |
JDPriestly |
Jul-17-10 07:31 PM |
#99 |
-
Please read at least the title of the OP. |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-17-10 10:30 PM |
#101 |
-
I thought I understood what you meant until you said I was disagreeing with you. |
JDPriestly |
Jul-18-10 12:42 AM |
#103 |
-
Good golly. |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-18-10 04:16 PM |
#104 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-14-10 04:41 PM |
#31 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-14-10 06:38 PM |
#38 |
-
Tax Rates vs Unemployment, by the numbers. |
GETPLANING |
Jul-14-10 04:46 PM |
#32 |
-
I wonder what you think |
INTMANOMYST |
Jul-14-10 05:24 PM |
#33 |
 -
Small business revenue is different than profit - you can have revenue |
haele |
Jul-15-10 03:17 PM |
#83 |
-
Thanks! |
INTMANOMYST |
Jul-16-10 12:21 AM |
#86 |
-
It is simply a veiled threat. Tax breaks or we cut you off. No jobs. No investment. |
bluerum |
Jul-14-10 05:37 PM |
#34 |
-
I'd like someone to explain how rich people "make jobs" when they get richer |
Canuckistanian |
Jul-14-10 05:56 PM |
#35 |
-
The underlying fiction is that the rich "create" wealth. |
Dr Morbius |
Jul-14-10 06:01 PM |
#36 |
-
K&R. I agree. Merde is the only thing that's trickled down. //nt |
Overseas |
Jul-14-10 06:29 PM |
#37 |
-
My dyed-in-the-wool Libertarian, mega-corporate attorney, spouse, a few months before he passed on, |
patrice |
Jul-14-10 08:05 PM |
#40 |
-
k & R |
donheld |
Jul-14-10 09:43 PM |
#44 |
-
"Why not give more money to those who create jobs?" |
johnaries |
Jul-14-10 09:55 PM |
#47 |
 -
in order for jobs to be created, supply AND demand need to be in balance with adequate capital |
unblock |
Jul-14-10 10:45 PM |
#51 |
-
If the Bush tax cuts had actually worked to create jobs we would have tons of jobs right now. |
livingonearth |
Jul-14-10 10:46 PM |
#52 |
-
30 years |
guitar man |
Jul-14-10 11:24 PM |
#56 |
 -
simply put, |
NYMdaveNYI |
Jul-15-10 10:37 AM |
#71 |
-
thanks for linking to that |
hfojvt |
Jul-15-10 01:53 AM |
#57 |
-
K&R |
Enthusiast |
Jul-15-10 03:23 AM |
#58 |
-
Jefferson's "thing of wax" nightmare had come to pass. |
Bryn |
Jul-15-10 03:55 AM |
#61 |
 -
Wow! |
OJones |
Jul-16-10 05:46 PM |
#94 |
-
it 's a false notion that tax cuts for the weathy results in job creation |
SemperEadem |
Jul-15-10 05:08 AM |
#62 |
-
Actual data |
quaker bill |
Jul-15-10 06:46 AM |
#64 |
 -
the problem is excess capacity |
dem mba |
Jul-15-10 12:33 PM |
#81 |
-
tax cuts |
530jonathan |
Jul-15-10 08:06 AM |
#67 |
 -
before Reagan, I believe the tax rate for the wealthy was about 66% |
newspeak |
Jul-15-10 11:07 AM |
#74 |
-
K & R X 10 |
lonestarnot |
Jul-15-10 09:59 AM |
#69 |
-
I don't mind taxes returning to their former state |
LatteLibertine |
Jul-15-10 10:56 AM |
#73 |
-
What tax cuts for the rich result in is more money for the rich, and less for the poor |
EstimatedProphet |
Jul-15-10 11:16 AM |
#75 |
-
If anything, the last 30 years have taught us that Reaganomics was a failure |
KansDem |
Jul-15-10 11:25 AM |
#76 |
-
Honestly |
LatteLibertine |
Jul-15-10 03:23 PM |
#84 |
-
GOPers have NO INTENTION of increasing employment, nor do the big corporations. |
old mark |
Jul-16-10 02:10 AM |
#88 |
 -
+1 |
Urban Prairie |
Jul-17-10 02:27 PM |
#98 |
-
Kick for importance. |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-17-10 10:30 PM |
#102 |