Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-08-10 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #64 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
| -How in hell can someone "support" Arizona's anti-immigrant law? |
Atticus |
Jul-08-10 12:24 AM |
#0 |
-
As someone with conservative leanings on immigration, I find the AZ bill to be an abomination |
bluestateguy |
Jul-08-10 12:26 AM |
#1 |
-
I think illegal immigration is a problem, and one that should be addressed. |
Skip Intro |
Jul-08-10 12:31 AM |
#2 |
 -
The real problem are employers |
nadinbrzezinski |
Jul-08-10 12:39 AM |
#5 |
  -
I doubt those are completely legit companies that hire illegal immigrants. |
dkf |
Jul-08-10 02:35 AM |
#14 |
 -
Ever read "Fast Food Nation"? |
kimmylavin |
Jul-08-10 08:48 AM |
#27 |
 -
You mean like oh TYSON foods? |
nadinbrzezinski |
Jul-08-10 05:14 PM |
#46 |
 -
Illegal immigration is exploitive |
Mimosa |
Jul-08-10 09:57 PM |
#70 |
 -
As has been pointed out to you before, you're defending a law written by a hate group |
EFerrari |
Jul-08-10 01:51 AM |
#10 |
  -
Self Delete |
wiggle-room |
Jul-08-10 09:21 PM |
#62 |
 -
The Arizona law fuels abuse and racism directed at the legal immigrants. |
mmonk |
Jul-08-10 09:19 AM |
#31 |
 -
the AZ law is profoundly racist and anyone who supports it is a racist. |
datasuspect |
Jul-08-10 06:40 PM |
#49 |
  -
You're certainly entitled to your opinion, but despite the over the top psuedo-namecalling, I stand |
Skip Intro |
Jul-08-10 09:12 PM |
#60 |
 -
nothing directed at you personally |
datasuspect |
Jul-08-10 09:58 PM |
#71 |
 -
Good to know. |
Skip Intro |
Jul-08-10 11:20 PM |
#90 |
 -
no. |
datasuspect |
Jul-10-10 07:26 AM |
#104 |
 -
Exactly so, Skip Intro |
Mimosa |
Jul-08-10 09:42 PM |
#65 |
-
It will most likely be ruled unconstitutional. |
AtomicKitten |
Jul-08-10 12:37 AM |
#3 |
-
Did I say, or did I not say |
hfojvt |
Jul-08-10 12:39 AM |
#4 |
 -
"Zealous" is not a negative comment. I freely admit to being zealous. If you mean to call me a |
Atticus |
Jul-08-10 12:59 AM |
#8 |
  -
Nice.. bravo |
disillusioned73 |
Jul-08-10 06:59 AM |
#16 |
  -
you implied that with your title |
hfojvt |
Jul-08-10 09:05 AM |
#29 |
 -
When I get "paraphrased" like that, I usually get kissed. nt |
Atticus |
Jul-08-10 06:49 PM |
#50 |
 -
Why are you generalizing to "lefties"? |
EFerrari |
Jul-08-10 02:02 AM |
#13 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-08-10 07:16 AM |
#19 |
  -
+1 |
LostinVA |
Jul-08-10 07:50 AM |
#22 |
  -
actually I am paraphrasing but people like to pick nits |
hfojvt |
Jul-08-10 09:28 AM |
#32 |
 -
Is your claim that a paraphrase can not be indicated |
Bluenorthwest |
Jul-08-10 09:50 AM |
#36 |
  -
How did this get to be the topic? |
hfojvt |
Jul-08-10 10:46 AM |
#40 |
 -
I think you made a careless reply, maybe one that didn't convey what you intended, |
Atticus |
Jul-08-10 07:08 PM |
#52 |
 -
Your quotation marks are actually against the rules |
LostinVA |
Jul-08-10 07:49 AM |
#21 |
-
thanks for your concern and support |
hfojvt |
Jul-08-10 09:43 AM |
#34 |
-
Well why don't you offer us the details of how your |
Bluenorthwest |
Jul-08-10 09:58 AM |
#37 |
-
what I think is that people should be more tolerant |
hfojvt |
Jul-08-10 10:35 AM |
#39 |
-
I was able to read the OP for myself, thanks. |
Bluenorthwest |
Jul-08-10 03:47 PM |
#42 |
-
Primacy Clause |
nadinbrzezinski |
Jul-08-10 12:41 AM |
#6 |
-
anything is possible when you put hate first in your life |
Sen. Walter Sobchak |
Jul-08-10 12:46 AM |
#7 |
-
The framing has been the key . "ILLEGAL". is the emphasis. |
OHdem10 |
Jul-08-10 01:44 AM |
#9 |
 -
"Illegals" pay taxes just like everyone else. They are funding Social Security right now. |
EFerrari |
Jul-08-10 01:54 AM |
#11 |
-
You honestly think the majority of illegal immigrants pay into social security? |
dkf |
Jul-09-10 03:11 AM |
#92 |
-
NYT: How Immigrants Saved Social Security |
pinboy3niner |
Jul-09-10 03:54 AM |
#93 |
-
There is something completely irrational about the support for this law. |
EFerrari |
Jul-08-10 01:58 AM |
#12 |
-
Since support for the AZ law is a sizable portion, if not a majority of the US |
kelly1mm |
Jul-08-10 06:43 AM |
#15 |
 -
Majorities have supported absurd policies and laws throughout history |
TheKentuckian |
Jul-08-10 07:55 AM |
#23 |
  -
Uh, in DEMOCRACY the majority rules. |
minavasht |
Jul-08-10 11:12 AM |
#41 |
 -
And that's why we have a constitution that guarantees certain rights |
EFerrari |
Jul-08-10 04:01 PM |
#44 |
  -
Exactly |
minavasht |
Jul-08-10 09:02 PM |
#59 |
 -
*crickets* |
Skip Intro |
Jul-08-10 09:15 PM |
#61 |
  -
Are you kidding? I'm still waiting for your response upthread from yesterday. |
EFerrari |
Jul-08-10 10:22 PM |
#81 |
 -
Where you said I defended the law? But I didn't defend the law, in this thread or any other. |
Skip Intro |
Jul-08-10 11:16 PM |
#88 |
 -
And again with the" feds not doing their job" talking point. |
EFerrari |
Jul-09-10 01:07 PM |
#98 |
 -
That doesn't even make sense. Racial profiling is illegal in this country. |
EFerrari |
Jul-08-10 09:22 PM |
#63 |
  -
I ask again |
minavasht |
Jul-08-10 09:45 PM |
#66 |
 -
I sure hope that, after reading your own post , you have enough sense to be embarrassed. nt |
Atticus |
Jul-08-10 09:54 PM |
#69 |
  -
As a matter of fact |
minavasht |
Jul-08-10 10:08 PM |
#74 |
 -
I absolutely don't have all the answers, but I can usually keep track of what a previous poster |
Atticus |
Jul-08-10 10:19 PM |
#80 |
 -
Strawman. This law profiles brown people |
EFerrari |
Jul-08-10 10:15 PM |
#77 |
  -
Would you have a problem |
minavasht |
Jul-08-10 11:14 PM |
#87 |
 -
The Constitution grants rights to persons in the United States |
COLGATE4 |
Jul-08-10 10:35 PM |
#83 |
 -
Hm, |
minavasht |
Jul-08-10 11:10 PM |
#86 |
 -
And where in any of the posts in this thread has anyone said that? Hmmm? |
Atticus |
Jul-08-10 09:51 PM |
#67 |
 -
because the constitution of the united states doesn't deal with the civil or criminal administration |
datasuspect |
Jul-08-10 10:13 PM |
#76 |
 -
Your post would be relevant if we lived in a functioning democracy. nt. |
Atticus |
Jul-08-10 07:35 PM |
#55 |
 -
The majority is not a tyranny and might does not make right |
TheKentuckian |
Jul-09-10 08:05 AM |
#95 |
 -
Lots of "real" motivations suck really badly. |
Atticus |
Jul-08-10 07:20 PM |
#53 |
 -
i wonder why blacks could never understand this: |
datasuspect |
Jul-08-10 10:09 PM |
#75 |
-
Because there are a large number of fucking stupid angry bigots in the US |
old mark |
Jul-08-10 07:00 AM |
#17 |
-
Wake Up America... |
limit18 |
Jul-08-10 07:15 AM |
#18 |
-
I agree with you whole heartily.. |
disillusioned73 |
Jul-08-10 07:32 AM |
#20 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-08-10 08:18 AM |
#24 |
-
Hand me a link? Cause friends say the revised version |
Sentath |
Jul-08-10 09:11 AM |
#30 |
 -
Yes, it's right wing bullshit. The Fed program "Secure Communities" |
EFerrari |
Jul-08-10 06:10 PM |
#47 |
-
They tried to rewrite it, remember? The "actual law" still depends upon |
EFerrari |
Jul-08-10 04:02 PM |
#45 |
-
Good; then I predict they will ask me if I can prove I'm not Canadian. |
blondeatlast |
Jul-08-10 06:21 PM |
#48 |
-
Gee, I wonder what forum you dropped in from? nt. |
Atticus |
Jul-08-10 07:24 PM |
#54 |
-
I am shocked by the fact that most Americans, apparently, support this POS law! |
Odin2005 |
Jul-08-10 08:23 AM |
#25 |
-
Why do we have borders? |
MyNameGoesHere |
Jul-08-10 08:25 AM |
#26 |
 -
One of things people do not know |
Monique1 |
Jul-08-10 09:01 AM |
#28 |
-
K&R #4 n/t |
UTUSN |
Jul-08-10 09:32 AM |
#33 |
-
Comprehensive immigration reform increases all workers’ wages. |
pampango |
Jul-08-10 09:49 AM |
#35 |
 -
factcheck.org: Economists say immigration, legal or illegal, doesn't hurt American workers. |
pinboy3niner |
Jul-09-10 01:08 AM |
#91 |
-
Fun DU activity! |
Bluenorthwest |
Jul-08-10 10:02 AM |
#38 |
 -
Indeed, because this longtime Arizonan still doesn't see a threat from the south. |
blondeatlast |
Jul-08-10 03:58 PM |
#43 |
-
Surprises me when I see any support for it too. From the ACLU on the subject, |
Jefferson23 |
Jul-08-10 06:55 PM |
#51 |
-
Again ...mixing it up so as to confuse the issue. |
L0oniX |
Jul-08-10 08:49 PM |
#56 |
-
They don't understand the concept of jurisdiction. |
Manifestor_of_Light |
Jul-08-10 08:57 PM |
#57 |
-
Here's the actual law... |
Balbus |
Jul-08-10 09:00 PM |
#58 |
-
Dunno |
ismnotwasm |
Jul-08-10 09:25 PM |
#64 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-08-10 09:52 PM |
#68 |
-
it's factually incorrect because filipinos aren't mexicans |
datasuspect |
Jul-08-10 10:03 PM |
#72 |
 -
The Chandler Roundup of 1997 proves every point you made, too. |
blondeatlast |
Jul-08-10 10:59 PM |
#85 |
-
That was just---remarkable. Say "hi" to RimJob, ok? |
Atticus |
Jul-08-10 10:04 PM |
#73 |
-
Wrong. The law depends upon racial profiling |
EFerrari |
Jul-08-10 10:28 PM |
#82 |
-
Are you familiar with the Chandler Roundup? Methinks not, so here: |
blondeatlast |
Jul-08-10 10:55 PM |
#84 |
-
It is? The ACLU is all wrong, how so? I don't see anything in |
Jefferson23 |
Jul-09-10 01:50 PM |
#102 |
-
Because... |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Jul-08-10 10:16 PM |
#78 |
-
It's easy when one is a racist and a nativist who is full of fear about "the other". |
political_Dem |
Jul-08-10 10:18 PM |
#79 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-09-10 04:29 AM |
#94 |
-
In Maricopa County, the sheriff is under Federal investigation for corruption. |
EFerrari |
Jul-09-10 12:48 PM |
#96 |
-
It's tragic your fear has gotten the best of you--but there's no reason for it. I pity you, actually |
blondeatlast |
Jul-09-10 12:56 PM |
#97 |
-
In what part of our otherwise* beautiful state do you reside? |
blondeatlast |
Jul-09-10 01:09 PM |
#99 |
-
I see we've had a pizza delivery. |
EFerrari |
Jul-09-10 01:42 PM |
#100 |
-
Gosh darn. |
blondeatlast |
Jul-09-10 01:48 PM |
#101 |
-
+2! |
pinboy3niner |
Jul-09-10 01:51 PM |
#103 |
-
Here is yet more proof of how stupid this law is |
SargeUNN |
Jul-08-10 11:19 PM |
#89 |