You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #42: Because no credible observer thinks it's worthless. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-30-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
42. Because no credible observer thinks it's worthless.
Some are disappointed, but you won't find a single person outside of FinReg Peacock Russ Feingold of any stature saying it does nothing to make things beter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -OK...so tell me...why is a pissed-down-to-nothing "Financial Reform" bill still WORTH passing? Ken Burch  Jun-30-10 01:18 AM   #0 
  - Because it's a WIN !!!1111  leftstreet   Jun-30-10 01:21 AM   #1 
  - Financial Reform looks good on a resume. nt  ZombieHorde   Jun-30-10 01:34 AM   #2 
  - Wasn't the resume thing Bush Sr's motivation for running for president?  Ken Burch   Jun-30-10 01:35 AM   #3 
     - I don't know, but I would not be surprised. POTUS is good for resumes. nt  ZombieHorde   Jun-30-10 01:42 AM   #6 
  - Yeah....Status quo is really just peachy keen.  FrenchieCat   Jun-30-10 01:38 AM   #4 
  - Status Quo isn't the ONLY alternative  Ken Burch   Jun-30-10 02:10 AM   #9 
  - Why do you assume that we would EVER get something better before the next crisis?  BzaDem   Jun-30-10 07:54 AM   #31 
  - "Why do people always assume that there is some possible way to get what they want?"  Ken Burch   Jun-30-10 04:03 PM   #43 
     - You are saying that one can't be an activist but also understand reality?  BzaDem   Jun-30-10 08:25 PM   #49 
        - Here we go with the "reality" talk  DireStrike   Jun-30-10 10:18 PM   #55 
           - If you disagree, please list the 60 Senators/218 reps that would vote for something stronger.  BzaDem   Jun-30-10 10:46 PM   #56 
  - And wait! There's more!  CrispyQ   Jun-30-10 09:35 AM   #35 
  - "Nothing that puts Wall Street on notice in any meaningful way."  The Green Manalishi   Jun-30-10 11:10 PM   #62 
  - Status Quo is not much different than this bill.  sabrina 1   Jun-30-10 02:33 AM   #12 
  - the teabaggers had to cancel their national rally for lack of attendance, so give it up already.  Hannah Bell   Jun-30-10 02:45 AM   #15 
  - Exactly how does this financial bill change the status quo?  jgraz   Jun-30-10 02:51 AM   #17 
  - And so there it is?  tekisui   Jun-30-10 07:13 AM   #26 
     - Don't we need a new version of Godwin's?  Jakes Progress   Jun-30-10 07:25 AM   #27 
     - Delete wrong spot n/t  TransitJohn   Jun-30-10 11:00 PM   #57 
     - You should be defending your position that a good but not good-enough bill is worth killing.  BzaDem   Jun-30-10 07:58 AM   #33 
  - The banksters will soon need more bailout money!! (n/t)  ProudDad   Jun-30-10 01:39 AM   #5 
  - And they'll get it by...  MattSh   Jun-30-10 06:02 AM   #24 
  - False premise in the present context ...  RoyGBiv   Jun-30-10 01:45 AM   #7 
  - agreed. It is worse than doing nothing.  provis99   Jun-30-10 02:22 AM   #10 
     - Your support for this assertion is what?  RoyGBiv   Jun-30-10 02:26 AM   #11 
        - Another meltdown is inevitable (in absence of adequate regulations). It's virtually a certainty at  inna   Jun-30-10 03:48 AM   #21 
           - Is there anything IN the legislation that would actually prevent a meltdown, though?  Ken Burch   Jun-30-10 04:01 AM   #22 
              - here's what i thought:  inna   Jun-30-10 04:25 AM   #23 
  - Because it is a perfect match and mate to ...  Newest Reality   Jun-30-10 02:05 AM   #8 
  - I can think of two reasons.  napi21   Jun-30-10 02:39 AM   #13 
  - No, it's not.  blindpig   Jun-30-10 04:58 PM   #46 
  - Have to protect the banks in the upcoming headache.  Wilms   Jun-30-10 02:43 AM   #14 
  - Because......  democrank   Jun-30-10 02:47 AM   #16 
  - For the same reason a a pissed-down-to-nothing "Healthcare Reform" bill was worth passing  jgraz   Jun-30-10 02:52 AM   #18 
  - All holes, no cheese..  girl gone mad   Jun-30-10 03:07 AM   #19 
  - I suspect that, if the bill is even marginally good, Feingold will vote for it.  inna   Jun-30-10 03:36 AM   #20 
  - Feingold is running for re-election. This has nothing to do with policy.  BzaDem   Jun-30-10 08:00 AM   #34 
     - Actually, it has EVERYTHING to do with policy.  inna   Jun-30-10 01:07 PM   #39 
        - Unless he thinks this bill will make a meltdown MORE likely, it has nothing to do with policy.  BzaDem   Jun-30-10 08:28 PM   #50 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jun-30-10 07:07 AM   #25 
  - You vill now be told eggzactly vhy. Zit und be qviet.  Stinky The Clown   Jun-30-10 07:36 AM   #28 
  - ...k so there are NO...NOT ONE ...tangible change in this bill vs status quo?! Seriously? Do you guy  uponit7771   Jun-30-10 07:39 AM   #29 
  - As a general matter, why do people that say X shouldn't be passed because it doesn't go far enough?  BzaDem   Jun-30-10 07:49 AM   #30 
  - I defer to Elizabeth Warren on this. nt  Hosnon   Jun-30-10 07:57 AM   #32 
  - Are you repeating talking points or do you actually know what the  IOKIYAL   Jun-30-10 10:22 AM   #36 
  - SELF DELETE n/t  emulatorloo   Jun-30-10 11:24 AM   #37 
  - To give the next Republican majority more to repeal/undermine. n/t  Orsino   Jun-30-10 11:26 AM   #38 
  - Consider the Source  ProudDad   Jun-30-10 01:36 PM   #40 
  - Mainly because it is NOT a "pissed-down-to-nothing" bill....  scheming daemons   Jun-30-10 01:47 PM   #41 
  - Quoting this.  Arkana   Jun-30-10 08:45 PM   #53 
  - Because no credible observer thinks it's worthless.  geek tragedy   Jun-30-10 01:49 PM   #42 
  - Because it can be claimed as a win for Obama. nt  LWolf   Jun-30-10 04:18 PM   #44 
  - Because we don't pay for elections, the corporations do.  Festivito   Jun-30-10 04:26 PM   #45 
  - Because it's easier to amend (new legislation) an existing bill than pass one from scratch n/m  Rosco T.   Jun-30-10 05:01 PM   #47 
  - How often does that happen? THey're going to declare victory and move on to their next  Raineyb   Jun-30-10 07:16 PM   #48 
  - the fact that the financial industry isn't screaming bloody murder tells me all i need to know  KG   Jun-30-10 08:36 PM   #51 
  - Glad someone is paying attention.  harun   Jun-30-10 08:41 PM   #52 
  - K&R more here:  amborin   Jun-30-10 09:53 PM   #54 
  - Chess Move n/t  TransitJohn   Jun-30-10 11:00 PM   #58 
  - Part 2 is coming  Rosa Luxemburg   Jun-30-10 11:01 PM   #59 
  - so we can claim it as a success and that we have done something  NHLrocks   Jun-30-10 11:04 PM   #60 
  - I heard Thom Hartmann say "nibbled to pieces by lobbyist ducks"  Canuckistanian   Jun-30-10 11:07 PM   #61 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC