mzmolly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-27-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #84 |
| -Here they go again: TX-Gov: GOP pays to get Green candidate on the ballot |
WI_DEM |
Jun-25-10 01:49 PM |
#0 |
 -
KR |
Hannah Bell |
Jun-25-10 01:51 PM |
#1 |
| -
I remeber back in 2004 |
bluestateguy |
Jun-25-10 01:54 PM |
#2 |
| -
Introducing: George W. Bush! |
USArmyParatrooper |
Jun-25-10 01:58 PM |
#3 |
  -
I wasn't under the impression that the Green Party was responsible for ANY of the |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 02:02 PM |
#4 |
| -
+1 |
xchrom |
Jun-25-10 02:10 PM |
#6 |
| -
Two things |
USArmyParatrooper |
Jun-25-10 02:23 PM |
#8 |
| -
Nader had every right to run. You have no right to tell anyone that they have no right to run. |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 02:51 PM |
#11 |
| -
By all means show me anywhere I said he didn't have the "right" to run. |
USArmyParatrooper |
Jun-25-10 03:07 PM |
#18 |
| -
"Ralph Nader knew he had zero chance at being elected and he ran anyway" |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:13 PM |
#21 |
| -
Complete and total strawman |
USArmyParatrooper |
Jun-25-10 03:20 PM |
#26 |
| -
And he ran anyway. The use of the word anyway implies that he did something |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:24 PM |
#27 |
| -
My ignorance of basic phrases? |
USArmyParatrooper |
Jun-25-10 03:38 PM |
#33 |
| -
Yes, your ignorance of basic phrases. Did I stutter? n/t |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:42 PM |
#38 |
| -
No, you didn't studder. Nor did you address anything in my post. |
USArmyParatrooper |
Jun-25-10 03:48 PM |
#44 |
| -
Why rehash the same old tired shit? When you blame Democrats who voted for Bush with |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:52 PM |
#50 |
| -
Find me an individual Democrat who voted for Bush... |
USArmyParatrooper |
Jun-25-10 03:59 PM |
#57 |
| -
I don't go asking people how they voted. That's none of my business. If you're looking for someone |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 04:00 PM |
#59 |
| -
Then don't imply I'm not equally hard on Dems who voted for Bush |
USArmyParatrooper |
Jun-25-10 04:07 PM |
#62 |
| -
I can tell that's the case by the argument you make. |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 06:41 PM |
#74 |
| -
Of course that's true |
okie |
Jun-25-10 03:49 PM |
#45 |
| -
Horseshit! Your translation skills do not approach your Nader-fluffing expertise. |
11 Bravo |
Jun-25-10 03:34 PM |
#32 |
| -
Your lack of reading comprehension skills are of no interest to me. |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:41 PM |
#37 |
| -
Setting YOUR lack of reading comprehension skills aside.. |
USArmyParatrooper |
Jun-25-10 03:45 PM |
#40 |
| -
There were enough Democrats who voted for Bush to counter that as well. A fact that you seem to |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:50 PM |
#47 |
| -
And yet, even more strawman from you |
USArmyParatrooper |
Jun-25-10 03:52 PM |
#51 |
| -
"anyway": adv ..."used to indicate that something ... |
11 Bravo |
Jun-25-10 03:51 PM |
#48 |
| -
I must admit, that was very eloquent bullshit |
USArmyParatrooper |
Jun-25-10 03:56 PM |
#55 |
| -
Ummm ... |
11 Bravo |
Jun-25-10 04:10 PM |
#63 |
| -
My mistake |
USArmyParatrooper |
Jun-25-10 05:30 PM |
#66 |
| -
I was a "leg". We didn't do that sky shit, but let's hear it. |
11 Bravo |
Jun-25-10 06:33 PM |
#73 |
| -
It's an 11B thing |
USArmyParatrooper |
Jun-25-10 06:43 PM |
#76 |
| -
I've been out since '72. |
11 Bravo |
Jun-25-10 07:37 PM |
#78 |
| -
I don't now about in '72 |
USArmyParatrooper |
Jun-25-10 08:00 PM |
#79 |
| -
I don't now about in '72 |
USArmyParatrooper |
Jun-25-10 08:00 PM |
#80 |
| -
lol. logic and critical thinking are not your strong suits |
cali |
Jun-25-10 03:48 PM |
#43 |
| -
Posted by the poster queen of illogic and invective. I'll take your words for what they're worth. |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:54 PM |
#52 |
| -
Fuck Ralph Nader.. |
sendero |
Jun-25-10 05:33 PM |
#67 |
| -
Same to you. n/t |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 06:42 PM |
#75 |
| -
And the old bastard promised he wouldn't be on the ballot in close states. |
Tarheel_Dem |
Jun-25-10 03:41 PM |
#36 |
| -
Florida would have been irrelevant if Gore won his home state. |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:44 PM |
#39 |
| -
There are a lot of IFs... |
USArmyParatrooper |
Jun-25-10 03:47 PM |
#42 |
| -
Yes a lot of ifs. But you only focus on one as if that if were the end all to be all when it's not. |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:55 PM |
#53 |
| -
If there are a lot of ifs... |
okie |
Jun-25-10 04:01 PM |
#60 |
| -
They don't want to hear that. It's easier to beat up on Ralph Nader. It's not like he has any |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 06:45 PM |
#77 |
| -
Blah...Blah...Blah.... |
Tarheel_Dem |
Jun-25-10 03:52 PM |
#49 |
| -
And neither does anyone who would expect such a promise to be made and kept. n/t |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:56 PM |
#54 |
| -
Of course... |
redqueen |
Jun-25-10 02:05 PM |
#5 |
| -
So why don't some leftists help.................. |
socialist_n_TN |
Jun-25-10 03:10 PM |
# |
| -
Go ahead, TX GOP - throw your money away |
blogslut |
Jun-25-10 02:14 PM |
#7 |
| -
And a judge just ruled him back off the ballot. |
damntexdem |
Jun-25-10 02:41 PM |
#9 |
| -
How dare they offer more choices for voters to choose from, |
Riftaxe |
Jun-25-10 02:43 PM |
#10 |
| -
They did it illegally and as a means for the GOP to dilute the Democratic vote |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Jun-25-10 02:55 PM |
#13 |
| -
That was knocked down in court today |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Jun-25-10 02:52 PM |
#12 |
| -
Greens and Nader are often the tools of the GOP in elections. |
TexasObserver |
Jun-25-10 03:00 PM |
#14 |
| -
Right because democracy is only a democracy when there are 2 parties to choose from. |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:04 PM |
#15 |
| -
I'm interested in electing Democrats. |
TexasObserver |
Jun-25-10 03:07 PM |
#17 |
| -
I'm interested in democracy. You clearly have other priorities. n/t |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:16 PM |
#23 |
| -
I'm interested in result. You're interested in process. |
TexasObserver |
Jun-25-10 03:17 PM |
#25 |
| -
What results? The ones that make the Democratic party keep their words? |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:26 PM |
#28 |
| -
ELECTION results. I want more Democrats than Republicans elected. |
TexasObserver |
Jun-25-10 03:31 PM |
#30 |
| -
Electing Democrats who act like Republicans isn't much of a result is it? I'm more |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:33 PM |
#31 |
| -
Do you understand why Democrats don't care for third party efforts? |
TexasObserver |
Jun-25-10 03:39 PM |
#34 |
| -
I don't live in Texas. But I do believe in having more choices on the ballot period. |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:46 PM |
#41 |
| -
So you'll support a party who takes illegal "corporate" funding as |
Tarheel_Dem |
Jun-25-10 03:49 PM |
#46 |
| -
Actually, if you bothered to read you'll see that I did mention that this is a problem. |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:57 PM |
#56 |
| -
Why not? Democrats get painted with a huge brush daily on DU. |
Tarheel_Dem |
Jun-25-10 04:19 PM |
#64 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-27-10 02:25 PM |
#87 |
| -
It was illegal |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Jun-25-10 03:08 PM |
#19 |
| -
That would be the problem then. It is not grounds for blanket condemnation of |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:10 PM |
#20 |
| -
I didn't see the blanket condemnation. I saw the Green Party being called out for being a GOP tool |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Jun-25-10 03:17 PM |
#24 |
| -
That has always been the accusation. The fact that it happened to be true in this case with this |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:27 PM |
#29 |
| -
I saw it for what it was. The Texas Green Party deserves no defense for their actions |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Jun-25-10 03:40 PM |
#35 |
| -
I"m not sure. The National Green party has had some fractures since 2000 so I |
Raineyb |
Jun-25-10 03:59 PM |
#58 |
| -
The problem with our current system is both viable parties exploit the third parties |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Jun-25-10 04:49 PM |
#65 |
| -
+1 n/t |
tammywammy |
Jun-25-10 05:36 PM |
#68 |
| -
There are several political parties in the US. Yet only THREE make the ballot in important races? |
mzmolly |
Jun-26-10 12:54 PM |
#82 |
| -
Mindlessly is right |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Jun-25-10 03:06 PM |
#16 |
| -
Where do candidates from the two major parties get their money? |
okie |
Jun-25-10 04:05 PM |
#61 |
| -
So they're aspiring to be what, the GOP light? |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Jun-25-10 06:12 PM |
#71 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-27-10 02:24 PM |
#86 |
| -
This is a Democratic site, not a Green party site. |
TexasObserver |
Jun-27-10 02:45 PM |
#88 |
| -
Then help a Teabagger get on the ballot |
socialist_n_TN |
Jun-25-10 03:15 PM |
#22 |
| -
The last governor election we had in Texas did have 4 candidates on the ballot |
tammywammy |
Jun-25-10 05:38 PM |
#69 |
| -
Here you go again- posting the same divisive story that been on DU for almost a week |
depakid |
Jun-25-10 05:53 PM |
#70 |
| -
The fact that Toomey led the Green Party effort just came out yesterday. |
tammywammy |
Jun-25-10 06:29 PM |
#72 |
| -
cartoon on it |
TexasObserver |
Jun-26-10 10:34 PM |
#83 |
| -
Gee do you think the Green Party will help the Republicans again? |
mzmolly |
Jun-26-10 12:44 PM |
#81 |
| -
Not this time, they're off the ballot. n/t |
tammywammy |
Jun-27-10 10:38 AM |
#84 |
| -
Good. |
mzmolly |
Jun-27-10 01:35 PM |
#85 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
