Unvanguard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-22-10 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
| 43. Thanks for your kind remarks. |
|
Edited on Tue Jun-22-10 01:59 PM by Unvanguard
In response:
1. As far as the first point, I think there's some danger of circularity here: if people take harsh criticism of Obama's harsh critics to be "threads bashing the left", then of course it will seem like this argument is an issue of "lefter/righter." Perhaps I haven't been paying enough attention, but I haven't noticed that many threads attacking actual left-wing stances: during the health care reform wars, for instance, there were not many people saying "single payer is a terrible idea and its advocates are crazy radicals." There are undoubtedly people--I am probably among them sometimes--who bash what we see as particularly unrealistic political stances taken by some people on the left, but I think this fits better into my framework of disputes over tactics rather than disputes over ideology. I think a great many things that are good social policy are nonetheless not politically achievable; this hardly makes me any less left-wing.
There are issues, of course, where there are substantive left/right disputes on DU--for instance, immigration reform--but for the most part I think these are different divisions than the ones that erupt over Obama.
Edit: I don't deny that, in the light of the heatedness of this debate and the broad-brush character of a lot of it, there is probably plenty of reason for left-wing people who do not share my view of Obama to feel bashed, and to feel bashed particularly because their views are strongly on the left. What I'm trying to say is that the core issue is not that, and we on both sides would do better to make an effort to understand each other than to leap to conclusions and mischaracterize.
2. As far as the second point, I'm not disputing that those of us who are on the "pro-Obama" side (to put things a bit simplistically) put, as a general matter, a higher premium on party loyalty than those who do not. My point is that this is a matter of means, not ends: we think party loyalty is important in light of the political circumstances to advance the left-wing ends we support.
|
| -It's time to stop misconstruing what the debate on DU is about. |
Unvanguard |
Jun-22-10 11:35 AM |
#0 |
-
"rather than caricaturing or otherwise distorting it" |
JuniperLea |
Jun-22-10 11:42 AM |
#1 |
-
Thanks for your thoughtful post... |
Scuba |
Jun-22-10 11:46 AM |
#2 |
 -
I think you've hit on a salient point that we often miss. Outside of DU, |
blondeatlast |
Jun-22-10 11:51 AM |
#4 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-22-10 11:50 AM |
#3 |
 -
I don't want the world to see DU as a "unified voice." I think spirited but reasoned debate |
blondeatlast |
Jun-22-10 11:54 AM |
#5 |
  -
Hell, I can't even agree with myself on Obama -- I sure don't expect to agree with other DUers. |
damntexdem |
Jun-22-10 12:59 PM |
#21 |
 -
Exactly. I take pride in knowing both of the extremes don't want me at their |
blondeatlast |
Jun-22-10 01:16 PM |
#29 |
 -
That's unfair, because they aren't trying for a unified voice |
treestar |
Jun-22-10 12:06 PM |
#8 |
-
I would love to have an idea how many DUers fall |
watrwefitinfor |
Jun-22-10 11:56 AM |
#6 |
 -
I've noticed a few of us around. |
Unvanguard |
Jun-22-10 12:21 PM |
#11 |
  -
Half of me agrees with you and the other half has doubts |
starroute |
Jun-22-10 01:33 PM |
#35 |
 -
I agree with your father's idea: a little ass kicking is needed. |
CTyankee |
Jun-22-10 01:44 PM |
#41 |
 -
Well, I think machine politics present substantially different issues |
Unvanguard |
Jun-22-10 02:12 PM |
#45 |
 -
I'll check in. |
rucky |
Jun-22-10 01:36 PM |
#36 |
-
The assessment of the political circumstances |
treestar |
Jun-22-10 12:03 PM |
#7 |
-
First, let me thank you for a particularly thoughtful post. Well done. |
Laelth |
Jun-22-10 12:13 PM |
#9 |
 -
Whatever the DU rules, I don't mind being insulted if the claim is true. |
Unvanguard |
Jun-22-10 12:33 PM |
#13 |
  -
That is pretty much it, the framing of the issue |
NJmaverick |
Jun-22-10 12:41 PM |
#14 |
   -
Many of us feel that holding Democrats' feet to the fire is very pragmatic. |
Laelth |
Jun-22-10 01:18 PM |
#32 |
  -
You find this framing "insulting"? |
NJmaverick |
Jun-22-10 01:32 PM |
#34 |
  -
I hear you. |
Laelth |
Jun-22-10 01:17 PM |
#31 |
 -
That's not true, though. |
Unvanguard |
Jun-22-10 01:38 PM |
#37 |
 -
"some of us just can't go there" |
ecstatic |
Jun-22-10 12:43 PM |
#15 |
-
I don't think it's likely that the Republicans will win. |
Laelth |
Jun-22-10 12:57 PM |
#20 |
-
So you're hoping that those of us who don't share your deep morals and convictions |
ecstatic |
Jun-22-10 01:02 PM |
#22 |
-
Comprehension fail |
Tailormyst |
Jun-22-10 01:14 PM |
#28 |
-
I think that Democrats should act like Democrats if they want to win. |
Laelth |
Jun-22-10 01:20 PM |
#33 |
-
Very well said and I agree whole heartedly with the views you have expressed |
NJmaverick |
Jun-22-10 12:19 PM |
#10 |
-
While there are some |
H2O Man |
Jun-22-10 12:31 PM |
#12 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-22-10 12:44 PM |
#16 |
 -
No, it violated a very specific rule--that of not calling out members or moderators. |
blondeatlast |
Jun-22-10 12:48 PM |
#17 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-22-10 01:06 PM |
#25 |
-
Frame it how you want. You did call out the mods. But if it makes you feel better, |
blondeatlast |
Jun-22-10 01:09 PM |
#27 |
-
When I first joined up back in 2001, I thought DU was for lefties who can still call themselves Dems |
librechik |
Jun-22-10 12:52 PM |
#18 |
 -
. |
walldude |
Jun-22-10 01:08 PM |
#26 |
-
I would like to see people try harder also. |
Tailormyst |
Jun-22-10 12:54 PM |
#19 |
 -
I will try my best to respond to this. |
Unvanguard |
Jun-22-10 01:16 PM |
#30 |
-
I agree whole-heartedly with your last line |
Tailormyst |
Jun-22-10 01:38 PM |
#38 |
-
But when would it be the right time... |
okie |
Jun-22-10 02:24 PM |
#48 |
-
I agree with much of what you say, but my pessimistic answer is "There is no real alternative." |
Unvanguard |
Jun-22-10 02:47 PM |
#51 |
-
Much depends on our perspective |
okie |
Jun-22-10 04:17 PM |
#52 |
-
I liked this OP. |
EFerrari |
Jun-22-10 01:03 PM |
#23 |
 -
Thanks for your kind remarks. |
Unvanguard |
Jun-22-10 01:55 PM |
#43 |
-
Excellent response |
HughMoran |
Jun-22-10 02:04 PM |
#44 |
-
The problem with arguing that this isn't a left/right conflict |
EFerrari |
Jun-22-10 02:17 PM |
#47 |
-
Fair enough. |
Unvanguard |
Jun-22-10 02:36 PM |
#49 |
-
Let's see how we do. |
EFerrari |
Jun-22-10 02:44 PM |
#50 |
-
Left-wing Democrats will disengage... |
TBF |
Jun-22-10 05:19 PM |
#53 |
-
Some of us are fighting for something much more deeper than you have posted. |
mmonk |
Jun-22-10 01:04 PM |
#24 |
-
K&R |
rucky |
Jun-22-10 01:39 PM |
#39 |
-
I could not agree with this post more. Well done. |
grantcart |
Jun-22-10 01:41 PM |
#40 |
-
Your political perspective and assessment of the issues we confront align with my thinking as well |
HughMoran |
Jun-22-10 01:55 PM |
#42 |
-
You are free to link to it as much as you like. |
Unvanguard |
Jun-22-10 02:15 PM |
#46 |