You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #55: I could never support that fucking closet queen who is gay and [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
55. I could never support that fucking closet queen who is gay and
Edited on Mon Jun-21-10 01:23 PM by jonnyblitz
takes an anti-gay stance. People should watch the documentary "Outrage".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -A friendly suggestion: Clone DU. Laelth  Jun-21-10 12:14 PM   #0 
  - Progressives are too narrow minded to co-exist - then the conservatives are smarter!  stray cat   Jun-21-10 12:19 PM   #1 
  - Have you had time to read Skinner's OP this morning?  EFerrari   Jun-21-10 12:32 PM   #10 
  - There will be a problem with the Florida race for senator. Charlie Crist (I)  monmouth   Jun-21-10 12:19 PM   #2 
  - I know the Obama admin is thinking of supporting Crist  babylonsister   Jun-21-10 12:21 PM   #4 
  - And who knows, Charlie has received a lot of good music from Dems  monmouth   Jun-21-10 12:28 PM   #5 
  - I could never support that fucking closet queen who is gay and  jonnyblitz   Jun-21-10 01:21 PM   #55 
  - Oh goody just what we need  dflprincess   Jun-21-10 12:38 PM   #20 
  - Crist is an I in name only  BeFree   Jun-21-10 12:31 PM   #7 
  - That would be a shame but I don't think you're the last word on it...n/t  monmouth   Jun-21-10 12:33 PM   #11 
     - Well, you'll see  BeFree   Jun-21-10 12:50 PM   #32 
  - Well, hush my mouth for saying it, but  peace frog   Jun-21-10 12:38 PM   #18 
  - Gawd  BeFree   Jun-21-10 12:52 PM   #34 
     - Check out the Dem, Kendrick Meek....A loser...n/t  monmouth   Jun-21-10 12:58 PM   #37 
        - I have  BeFree   Jun-21-10 01:08 PM   #42 
        - They can't all be Alan Grayson, more's the pity  peace frog   Jun-21-10 01:09 PM   #44 
        - Hey! He called a Democrat running for office a loser!  tmyers09   Jun-21-10 02:23 PM   #76 
  - there will always be a few like that  anigbrowl   Jun-21-10 01:06 PM   #41 
  - What about attacks from conservative Democrats?  YOY   Jun-21-10 12:20 PM   #3 
  - Oh, they're *very* careful not to directly break the rules.  Ignis   Jun-21-10 01:48 PM   #63 
  - You forgot "Rollseyes"  YOY   Jun-21-10 01:49 PM   #65 
     - I left that out because that's how I respond to the above.  Ignis   Jun-21-10 01:52 PM   #67 
  - How about the ones that use the "socialist" word for policies...  JHB   Jun-21-10 03:53 PM   #94 
  - Get in line, YOY  peace frog   Jun-21-10 03:56 PM   #95 
  - Hilarious  Electric Monk   Jun-21-10 12:29 PM   #6 
  - It was not intended as an attack.  Laelth   Jun-21-10 12:32 PM   #9 
  - I actually think this is a pretty smart idea  Tailormyst   Jun-21-10 12:32 PM   #8 
  - I'm sure you can find a board to "attack Democrats"  sandnsea   Jun-21-10 12:33 PM   #12 
  - This interface is excellent. This board is well-run.  Laelth   Jun-21-10 12:39 PM   #21 
  - If I can manage to engage without being banned  sandnsea   Jun-21-10 01:14 PM   #48 
  - Should criticism of Joe Lieberman have been censored?  PassingFair   Jun-21-10 12:39 PM   #22 
     - Can you do it without the "pink tutus"? n/t  sandnsea   Jun-21-10 01:13 PM   #46 
  - Ummmm......  Coyote_Bandit   Jun-21-10 12:33 PM   #13 
  - The site you are looking for already exists  scheming daemons   Jun-21-10 12:33 PM   #14 
  - +1 n/t  JTFrog   Jun-21-10 12:36 PM   #15 
  - Sigh. It appears I am doomed to be mis-heard here.  Laelth   Jun-21-10 12:37 PM   #16 
  - Maybe our suspicion is based on....  scheming daemons   Jun-21-10 12:42 PM   #24 
  - Guilt by association? I see. n/t  Laelth   Jun-21-10 12:43 PM   #25 
     - Huh? You want individual DU sites specifically catered to "associations"  scheming daemons   Jun-21-10 12:48 PM   #29 
        - I do not believe you are discussing this in good faith. n/t  Laelth   Jun-21-10 12:51 PM   #33 
           - Then we're even.... I don't believe your OP is in good faith n/t  scheming daemons   Jun-21-10 01:18 PM   #52 
  - If that were what Skinner and the guys wanted they would have done it.  Lone_Star_Dem   Jun-21-10 12:48 PM   #30 
  - Perhaps. Or, perhaps they never considered it.  Laelth   Jun-21-10 01:09 PM   #43 
     - You do know that by simply posting it in GD you have no assurance they will see it?  Lone_Star_Dem   Jun-21-10 01:35 PM   #58 
        - I posted the OP on Skinner's main thread.  Laelth   Jun-21-10 01:43 PM   #60 
           - Why would you assume the mods would discuss it with the admin?  Lone_Star_Dem   Jun-21-10 02:07 PM   #70 
              - Sorry. I can not justify my assumptions, though I was honest about them.  Laelth   Jun-21-10 02:19 PM   #75 
                 - You're more than welcome  Lone_Star_Dem   Jun-21-10 02:40 PM   #77 
  - You make an excellent point here:  leftstreet   Jun-21-10 01:25 PM   #56 
  - And the OP is already a member.  Blue-Jay   Jun-21-10 12:38 PM   #19 
  - Gosh, it seems to me...  Spazito   Jun-21-10 12:37 PM   #17 
  - Why re-invent the wheel? That does not make sense to me. n/t  Laelth   Jun-21-10 12:41 PM   #23 
  - Why ask others to do the heavy lifting for something you want to have happen?  Spazito   Jun-21-10 01:11 PM   #45 
  - Moot point... a site like the OP wants already exists  scheming daemons   Jun-21-10 12:46 PM   #27 
     - Yes, I know, both your points are accurate....  Spazito   Jun-21-10 01:14 PM   #49 
  - Looking forward to visiting your new site? Which name did you choose?  ret5hd   Jun-21-10 12:45 PM   #26 
  - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Jun-21-10 12:47 PM   #28 
  - I've said some things here that I shouldn't have said  anthroguy101   Jun-21-10 12:50 PM   #31 
  - Or perhaps a Progressive Forum on DU with relaxed rules?  yowzayowzayowza   Jun-21-10 12:53 PM   #35 
  - That might work. I suspect that forum will have a lot of traffic, though.  Laelth   Jun-21-10 01:15 PM   #50 
  - How would you adapt the new rules for that forum?  yowzayowzayowza   Jun-21-10 01:20 PM   #53 
  - I am not sure. It would depend on what the admins were willing to tolerate.  Laelth   Jun-21-10 01:32 PM   #57 
     - You mean like Chuckie C, that former (R) turned (I) running against ...  Spheric   Jun-21-10 02:51 PM   #80 
  - If that were true, the other sites that represent that view would have higher traffic  scheming daemons   Jun-21-10 01:21 PM   #54 
  - Maybe Admin would consider a free-for-all subforum  leftstreet   Jun-21-10 02:16 PM   #74 
     - I thought that was the Lounge.  yowzayowzayowza   Jun-21-10 03:20 PM   #90 
  - I wonder what would be in it for them  Orangepeel   Jun-21-10 12:55 PM   #36 
  - That's possible. I don't know.  Laelth   Jun-21-10 01:03 PM   #39 
  - That's kind of like asking you to take a second full time job for the same pay.  MilesColtrane   Jun-21-10 01:02 PM   #38 
  - Would it be twice the work? I really don't know.  Laelth   Jun-21-10 01:05 PM   #40 
  - You should get right on that...nt  SidDithers   Jun-21-10 01:14 PM   #47 
  - "Disagreementa are what make horse-races." Mark Twain  Tierra_y_Libertad   Jun-21-10 01:17 PM   #51 
  - Sure... I'm positive this site is a snap to manage...  redqueen   Jun-21-10 01:39 PM   #59 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jun-21-10 01:44 PM   #61 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jun-21-10 01:44 PM   #62 
  - But, please feel free to hint the emperor's wearing apparal may be incomplete.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Jun-21-10 01:48 PM   #64 
     - But hint only please  Oregone   Jun-21-10 01:50 PM   #66 
        - 'Zactly. And, only hint that there is a possiblility that the apparel is absent.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Jun-21-10 02:52 PM   #81 
  - Blech, nevermind.  Barack_America   Jun-21-10 01:58 PM   #68 
  - Am I misunderstanding...?  chowder66   Jun-21-10 02:06 PM   #69 
  - I use the word "attack" for clarity purposes, though I admit it is extreme.  Laelth   Jun-21-10 02:14 PM   #73 
     - still confused....maybe?  chowder66   Jun-21-10 02:48 PM   #79 
        - I don't want to be looking over my shoulder all the time here.  Laelth   Jun-21-10 02:55 PM   #84 
           - I'm sorry you feel that way....seriously  chowder66   Jun-21-10 03:42 PM   #93 
  - That is not what was said  treestar   Jun-21-10 02:12 PM   #71 
  - Your sig line is part of the problem I see around here  ecstatic   Jun-21-10 02:13 PM   #72 
  - Well put. nt  Robb   Jun-21-10 02:56 PM   #85 
  - Bingo.  Vickers   Jun-21-10 03:35 PM   #92 
  - How passive aggressive.  HiFructosePronSyrup   Jun-21-10 02:43 PM   #78 
  - How wonderful of you to show your face.  tmyers09   Jun-21-10 02:53 PM   #82 
  - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Jun-21-10 02:54 PM   #83 
  - I don't see anything in the rules that would stop you  Radical Activist   Jun-21-10 02:57 PM   #86 
  - Enforcement has changed.  Laelth   Jun-21-10 03:01 PM   #87 
  - Werd! (nt)  whatchamacallit   Jun-21-10 03:07 PM   #88 
  - I see no problem criticizing a Dem, I think they are tired of the bashing  Rex   Jun-21-10 03:07 PM   #89 
  - .org and .net are pointing at .com. Could use one of them for a facade site where there are no rules  L0oniX   Jun-21-10 03:30 PM   #91 
  - so many of the members I admired and learned from  mikita   Jun-21-10 04:03 PM   #96 
  - I agree. The worst part in being banned from a forum is losing the connections  inna   Jun-21-10 04:20 PM   #97 
  - Locking  cbayer   Jun-21-10 04:21 PM   #98 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC