babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-21-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. I know the Obama admin is thinking of supporting Crist |
|
Edited on Mon Jun-21-10 12:24 PM by babylonsister
because he has a better shot than Meek, so I don't think you'll encounter any problems. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0610/38590.html Democrats flirt with backing Charlie Crist |
| -A friendly suggestion: Clone DU. |
Laelth |
Jun-21-10 12:14 PM |
#0 |
 -
Progressives are too narrow minded to co-exist - then the conservatives are smarter! |
stray cat |
Jun-21-10 12:19 PM |
#1 |
  -
Have you had time to read Skinner's OP this morning? |
EFerrari |
Jun-21-10 12:32 PM |
#10 |
| -
There will be a problem with the Florida race for senator. Charlie Crist (I) |
monmouth |
Jun-21-10 12:19 PM |
#2 |
| -
I know the Obama admin is thinking of supporting Crist |
babylonsister |
Jun-21-10 12:21 PM |
#4 |
| -
And who knows, Charlie has received a lot of good music from Dems |
monmouth |
Jun-21-10 12:28 PM |
#5 |
| -
I could never support that fucking closet queen who is gay and |
jonnyblitz |
Jun-21-10 01:21 PM |
#55 |
| -
Oh goody just what we need |
dflprincess |
Jun-21-10 12:38 PM |
#20 |
| -
Crist is an I in name only |
BeFree |
Jun-21-10 12:31 PM |
#7 |
| -
That would be a shame but I don't think you're the last word on it...n/t |
monmouth |
Jun-21-10 12:33 PM |
#11 |
| -
Well, you'll see |
BeFree |
Jun-21-10 12:50 PM |
#32 |
| -
Well, hush my mouth for saying it, but |
peace frog |
Jun-21-10 12:38 PM |
#18 |
| -
Gawd |
BeFree |
Jun-21-10 12:52 PM |
#34 |
| -
Check out the Dem, Kendrick Meek....A loser...n/t |
monmouth |
Jun-21-10 12:58 PM |
#37 |
| -
I have |
BeFree |
Jun-21-10 01:08 PM |
#42 |
| -
They can't all be Alan Grayson, more's the pity |
peace frog |
Jun-21-10 01:09 PM |
#44 |
| -
Hey! He called a Democrat running for office a loser! |
tmyers09 |
Jun-21-10 02:23 PM |
#76 |
| -
there will always be a few like that |
anigbrowl |
Jun-21-10 01:06 PM |
#41 |
| -
What about attacks from conservative Democrats? |
YOY |
Jun-21-10 12:20 PM |
#3 |
| -
Oh, they're *very* careful not to directly break the rules. |
Ignis |
Jun-21-10 01:48 PM |
#63 |
| -
You forgot "Rollseyes" |
YOY |
Jun-21-10 01:49 PM |
#65 |
| -
I left that out because that's how I respond to the above. |
Ignis |
Jun-21-10 01:52 PM |
#67 |
| -
How about the ones that use the "socialist" word for policies... |
JHB |
Jun-21-10 03:53 PM |
#94 |
| -
Get in line, YOY |
peace frog |
Jun-21-10 03:56 PM |
#95 |
| -
Hilarious |
Electric Monk |
Jun-21-10 12:29 PM |
#6 |
| -
It was not intended as an attack. |
Laelth |
Jun-21-10 12:32 PM |
#9 |
| -
I actually think this is a pretty smart idea |
Tailormyst |
Jun-21-10 12:32 PM |
#8 |
| -
I'm sure you can find a board to "attack Democrats" |
sandnsea |
Jun-21-10 12:33 PM |
#12 |
| -
This interface is excellent. This board is well-run. |
Laelth |
Jun-21-10 12:39 PM |
#21 |
| -
If I can manage to engage without being banned |
sandnsea |
Jun-21-10 01:14 PM |
#48 |
| -
Should criticism of Joe Lieberman have been censored? |
PassingFair |
Jun-21-10 12:39 PM |
#22 |
| -
Can you do it without the "pink tutus"? n/t |
sandnsea |
Jun-21-10 01:13 PM |
#46 |
| -
Ummmm...... |
Coyote_Bandit |
Jun-21-10 12:33 PM |
#13 |
| -
The site you are looking for already exists |
scheming daemons |
Jun-21-10 12:33 PM |
#14 |
| -
+1 n/t |
JTFrog |
Jun-21-10 12:36 PM |
#15 |
| -
Sigh. It appears I am doomed to be mis-heard here. |
Laelth |
Jun-21-10 12:37 PM |
#16 |
| -
Maybe our suspicion is based on.... |
scheming daemons |
Jun-21-10 12:42 PM |
#24 |
| -
Guilt by association? I see. n/t |
Laelth |
Jun-21-10 12:43 PM |
#25 |
| -
Huh? You want individual DU sites specifically catered to "associations" |
scheming daemons |
Jun-21-10 12:48 PM |
#29 |
| -
I do not believe you are discussing this in good faith. n/t |
Laelth |
Jun-21-10 12:51 PM |
#33 |
| -
Then we're even.... I don't believe your OP is in good faith n/t |
scheming daemons |
Jun-21-10 01:18 PM |
#52 |
| -
If that were what Skinner and the guys wanted they would have done it. |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Jun-21-10 12:48 PM |
#30 |
| -
Perhaps. Or, perhaps they never considered it. |
Laelth |
Jun-21-10 01:09 PM |
#43 |
| -
You do know that by simply posting it in GD you have no assurance they will see it? |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Jun-21-10 01:35 PM |
#58 |
| -
I posted the OP on Skinner's main thread. |
Laelth |
Jun-21-10 01:43 PM |
#60 |
| -
Why would you assume the mods would discuss it with the admin? |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Jun-21-10 02:07 PM |
#70 |
| -
Sorry. I can not justify my assumptions, though I was honest about them. |
Laelth |
Jun-21-10 02:19 PM |
#75 |
| -
You're more than welcome |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Jun-21-10 02:40 PM |
#77 |
| -
You make an excellent point here: |
leftstreet |
Jun-21-10 01:25 PM |
#56 |
| -
And the OP is already a member. |
Blue-Jay |
Jun-21-10 12:38 PM |
#19 |
| -
Gosh, it seems to me... |
Spazito |
Jun-21-10 12:37 PM |
#17 |
| -
Why re-invent the wheel? That does not make sense to me. n/t |
Laelth |
Jun-21-10 12:41 PM |
#23 |
| -
Why ask others to do the heavy lifting for something you want to have happen? |
Spazito |
Jun-21-10 01:11 PM |
#45 |
| -
Moot point... a site like the OP wants already exists |
scheming daemons |
Jun-21-10 12:46 PM |
#27 |
| -
Yes, I know, both your points are accurate.... |
Spazito |
Jun-21-10 01:14 PM |
#49 |
| -
Looking forward to visiting your new site? Which name did you choose? |
ret5hd |
Jun-21-10 12:45 PM |
#26 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Jun-21-10 12:47 PM |
#28 |
| -
I've said some things here that I shouldn't have said |
anthroguy101 |
Jun-21-10 12:50 PM |
#31 |
| -
Or perhaps a Progressive Forum on DU with relaxed rules? |
yowzayowzayowza |
Jun-21-10 12:53 PM |
#35 |
| -
That might work. I suspect that forum will have a lot of traffic, though. |
Laelth |
Jun-21-10 01:15 PM |
#50 |
| -
How would you adapt the new rules for that forum? |
yowzayowzayowza |
Jun-21-10 01:20 PM |
#53 |
| -
I am not sure. It would depend on what the admins were willing to tolerate. |
Laelth |
Jun-21-10 01:32 PM |
#57 |
| -
You mean like Chuckie C, that former (R) turned (I) running against ... |
Spheric |
Jun-21-10 02:51 PM |
#80 |
| -
If that were true, the other sites that represent that view would have higher traffic |
scheming daemons |
Jun-21-10 01:21 PM |
#54 |
| -
Maybe Admin would consider a free-for-all subforum |
leftstreet |
Jun-21-10 02:16 PM |
#74 |
| -
I thought that was the Lounge. |
yowzayowzayowza |
Jun-21-10 03:20 PM |
#90 |
| -
I wonder what would be in it for them |
Orangepeel |
Jun-21-10 12:55 PM |
#36 |
| -
That's possible. I don't know. |
Laelth |
Jun-21-10 01:03 PM |
#39 |
| -
That's kind of like asking you to take a second full time job for the same pay. |
MilesColtrane |
Jun-21-10 01:02 PM |
#38 |
| -
Would it be twice the work? I really don't know. |
Laelth |
Jun-21-10 01:05 PM |
#40 |
| -
You should get right on that...nt |
SidDithers |
Jun-21-10 01:14 PM |
#47 |
| -
"Disagreementa are what make horse-races." Mark Twain |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Jun-21-10 01:17 PM |
#51 |
| -
Sure... I'm positive this site is a snap to manage... |
redqueen |
Jun-21-10 01:39 PM |
#59 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-21-10 01:44 PM |
#61 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-21-10 01:44 PM |
#62 |
| -
But, please feel free to hint the emperor's wearing apparal may be incomplete. |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Jun-21-10 01:48 PM |
#64 |
| -
But hint only please |
Oregone |
Jun-21-10 01:50 PM |
#66 |
| -
'Zactly. And, only hint that there is a possiblility that the apparel is absent. |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Jun-21-10 02:52 PM |
#81 |
| -
Blech, nevermind. |
Barack_America |
Jun-21-10 01:58 PM |
#68 |
| -
Am I misunderstanding...? |
chowder66 |
Jun-21-10 02:06 PM |
#69 |
| -
I use the word "attack" for clarity purposes, though I admit it is extreme. |
Laelth |
Jun-21-10 02:14 PM |
#73 |
| -
still confused....maybe? |
chowder66 |
Jun-21-10 02:48 PM |
#79 |
| -
I don't want to be looking over my shoulder all the time here. |
Laelth |
Jun-21-10 02:55 PM |
#84 |
| -
I'm sorry you feel that way....seriously |
chowder66 |
Jun-21-10 03:42 PM |
#93 |
| -
That is not what was said |
treestar |
Jun-21-10 02:12 PM |
#71 |
| -
Your sig line is part of the problem I see around here |
ecstatic |
Jun-21-10 02:13 PM |
#72 |
| -
Well put. nt |
Robb |
Jun-21-10 02:56 PM |
#85 |
| -
Bingo. |
Vickers |
Jun-21-10 03:35 PM |
#92 |
| -
How passive aggressive. |
HiFructosePronSyrup |
Jun-21-10 02:43 PM |
#78 |
| -
How wonderful of you to show your face. |
tmyers09 |
Jun-21-10 02:53 PM |
#82 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Jun-21-10 02:54 PM |
#83 |
| -
I don't see anything in the rules that would stop you |
Radical Activist |
Jun-21-10 02:57 PM |
#86 |
| -
Enforcement has changed. |
Laelth |
Jun-21-10 03:01 PM |
#87 |
| -
Werd! (nt) |
whatchamacallit |
Jun-21-10 03:07 PM |
#88 |
| -
I see no problem criticizing a Dem, I think they are tired of the bashing |
Rex |
Jun-21-10 03:07 PM |
#89 |
| -
.org and .net are pointing at .com. Could use one of them for a facade site where there are no rules |
L0oniX |
Jun-21-10 03:30 PM |
#91 |
| -
so many of the members I admired and learned from |
mikita |
Jun-21-10 04:03 PM |
#96 |
| -
I agree. The worst part in being banned from a forum is losing the connections |
inna |
Jun-21-10 04:20 PM |
#97 |
| -
Locking |
cbayer |
Jun-21-10 04:21 PM |
#98 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread