You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

".... so was Chernobyl" -- Contessa Brewer on MSNBC [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Flaxbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:17 AM
Original message
".... so was Chernobyl" -- Contessa Brewer on MSNBC
Advertisements [?]
to Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison.

Hutchison mentioned that the BP accident was a statistical anomaly (part of her argument to resume deep water drilling). Brewer said "Well, so was Chernobyl".

And that brings us to a huge, very important point: we cannot trust any regulatory body in this country to do its job; we can't trust any industry run for profit to not cut corners if doing so will save money / boost the bottom line and make shareholders happy.

Are we really comfortable having nuclear power plants? One "statistical anomaly" in this country could wipe out multiple states for untold thousands of years. Please, take a moment to imagine what would happen if a similar chain of f*ckups that happened on the Deepwater Horizon rig occurred at a nuke plant. And don't tell me it couldn't happen.

We are absolute fools to think we can safely use nuclear power. The rest of the world joins us in this idiocy. There is acceptable risk, and then there is unacceptable risk, and nuclear power falls very squarely into the unacceptable risk category.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -".... so was Chernobyl" -- Contessa Brewer on MSNBC Flaxbee  Jun-16-10 11:17 AM   #0 
  - France has used nuclear power for quite a while, safely at that.  EOTE   Jun-16-10 11:20 AM   #1 
  - There is absolutely no way  Jackpine Radical   Jun-16-10 11:24 AM   #3 
  - Well, I understand that one never can say never.  EOTE   Jun-16-10 11:29 AM   #9 
  - The Titanic didn't really have independently sealed bulkheads  sharp_stick   Jun-16-10 11:33 AM   #12 
  - if you'd like to believe that, fine  Flaxbee   Jun-16-10 11:24 AM   #4 
  - That is true.  anthroguy101   Jun-16-10 11:21 AM   #2 
  - how is it clean?  Flaxbee   Jun-16-10 11:26 AM   #6 
  - I was asking about renewable energy compared to nuclear  anthroguy101   Jun-16-10 11:27 AM   #8 
  - Not renewable but it is clean.  fishbulb703   Jun-16-10 11:38 AM   #13 
  - Nuclear energy has one direct negative output.  Jackpine Radical   Jun-16-10 11:26 AM   #7 
  - i hear nuclear power is very safe  Enrique   Jun-16-10 11:24 AM   #5 
  - The Mining Companies in Australia have a 10,000 year responsibility  Ichingcarpenter   Jun-16-10 11:31 AM   #10 
  - I've not been a strong anti-nuke guy but it is hard to have any faith at all  TheKentuckian   Jun-16-10 11:32 AM   #11 
  - Okay there is water shortages in the South and West  EC   Jun-16-10 11:50 AM   #14 
  - EXACTlY!!! This accident has changed my stance on safe nuke power, can't trust deregulating politici  uponit7771   Jun-16-10 11:51 AM   #15 
  - I know!  XemaSab   Jun-16-10 11:52 AM   #16 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC