You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #31: Locking [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Grateful for Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
31. Locking
We are locking this at the thread author's request.

Grateful for Hope
For the DU Moderators
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Have we had a day before this last Tuesday where more disgusting women won elections? cascadiance  Jun-12-10 10:56 AM   #0 
  - Probably. But what, exactly, is an "undesirable woman?"  MineralMan   Jun-12-10 11:08 AM   #1 
  - Sorry, I should have qualified it better. My thread title was already too long...  cascadiance   Jun-12-10 11:15 AM   #3 
     - Hmm...I guess I don't see an intrinsic difference between men  MineralMan   Jun-12-10 11:23 AM   #6 
        - Thom Hartmann cites many positive characteristics when women have more power in society...  cascadiance   Jun-12-10 11:32 AM   #10 
           - Two of those women won Republican primary elections. It is to be  MineralMan   Jun-12-10 11:37 AM   #11 
           - Halter as a "PROGRESSIVE" was polling better than Lincoln was against Republicans...  cascadiance   Jun-12-10 12:02 PM   #15 
           - Ah, ok.. that is the RW meme of the day..  left coaster   Jun-12-10 01:08 PM   #28 
  - Maybe unintentional, but..  JohnnyLib2   Jun-12-10 11:12 AM   #2 
  - How about "disgusting". Perhaps a little stronger, but less potentially "sexist"...  cascadiance   Jun-12-10 11:20 AM   #5 
     - Are they somehow more "disgusting" than the equivalent  MineralMan   Jun-12-10 11:25 AM   #8 
        - I guess they are all "really" Republicans though two ARE registered Dems...  cascadiance   Jun-12-10 11:42 AM   #12 
  - We've had plenty of "undesirable" men-- now it's the women's turn.  TreasonousBastard   Jun-12-10 11:19 AM   #4 
  - For sure... Perhaps we turned a page Tuesday...  cascadiance   Jun-12-10 11:23 AM   #7 
  - There did seem to be a lot of corporate whore media hype about "all the women candidates"  Sebastian Doyle   Jun-12-10 11:30 AM   #9 
  - The right is just trying to play the vag card here..  left coaster   Jun-12-10 01:18 PM   #30 
  - we are getting more stupid as time goes on.  ProgressiveVictory   Jun-12-10 11:43 AM   #13 
  - Sorry, dude.. you are coming off as a sexist asshat..  left coaster   Jun-12-10 11:45 AM   #14 
  - I said they were disgusting BECAUSE OF THEIR POV!!!  cascadiance   Jun-12-10 12:15 PM   #16 
     - So, women are only acceptable  Abq_Sarah   Jun-12-10 12:32 PM   #20 
     - So tell me which of those I mentioned I should have more respect for...  cascadiance   Jun-12-10 12:38 PM   #24 
     - Expecting more from women is in and of itself sexist.  Codeine   Jun-12-10 12:35 PM   #22 
     - So is Thom Hartmann sexist?  cascadiance   Jun-12-10 12:39 PM   #25 
     - In my opinion, to base any part of one's vote on the gender of the candidate is wrong..  left coaster   Jun-12-10 12:37 PM   #23 
        - So why did we vote in two of them as Democrats if they are "typical Republicans"?  cascadiance   Jun-12-10 12:53 PM   #26 
           - I can only explain to you how I myself vote.. nt  left coaster   Jun-12-10 01:09 PM   #29 
  - Disgusting people.  Iggo   Jun-12-10 12:17 PM   #17 
  - Ain't it a bitch?  mitchum   Jun-12-10 12:19 PM   #18 
  - I think republican men are too damn embarrassed to run  Bitwit1234   Jun-12-10 12:24 PM   #19 
  - Perhaps there's something to that too...  cascadiance   Jun-12-10 12:34 PM   #21 
  - unrec.  emilyg   Jun-12-10 01:00 PM   #27 
  - Locking  Grateful for Hope   Jun-12-10 01:20 PM   #31 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC