You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: Really? it's not unusual to give high clearances to people that have no experiance? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Really? it's not unusual to give high clearances to people that have no experiance?
That seems absolutely absurd to me.

Al Queda has all kinds of american citizens sympathetic to them. How easy would it be for them to get classified information that could hurt this country if the DoD was that insane?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Pentagon Manhunt-Wikileaks-on the verge of publishing a batch of secret State Department cables kpete  Jun-11-10 08:44 AM   #0 
  - Why would a newbie 22 year old analyst in the military have access to such information?  no limit   Jun-11-10 08:51 AM   #1 
  - Cable = Electrically transmitted message (not document)  Gaedel   Jun-11-10 08:56 AM   #3 
  - But why would 18-22 year olds that have been in the military for such a short time  no limit   Jun-11-10 09:15 AM   #6 
     - 22 is old for a soldier  hootinholler   Jun-11-10 10:23 AM   #9 
     - Really? it's not unusual to give high clearances to people that have no experiance?  no limit   Jun-11-10 10:33 AM   #11 
        - Welcome to the defense industry.  hootinholler   Jun-11-10 12:30 PM   #12 
     - Bullshit, I hear people bragging about their clearances all the time.  arcadian   Jun-11-10 12:34 PM   #13 
  - He could potentially have some on a very specific issue that he was working  karynnj   Jun-11-10 09:00 AM   #5 
  - I read that security got very lax on his base  Clintonista2   Jun-11-10 12:41 PM   #14 
  - OMG we don't want people to know the truth.  L0oniX   Jun-11-10 08:53 AM   #2 
  - They need to publish them NOW!  Joanne98   Jun-11-10 08:56 AM   #4 
  - Exactly. Before Mr. Assange has an ''accident''. nt  Guy Whitey Corngood   Jun-11-10 10:31 AM   #10 
  - If it must be kept secret then it already is a danger to our national security.  izzybeans   Jun-11-10 09:46 AM   #7 
  - "...wed like his cooperation in this, Trans: "We want him in jail before he embarrasses us again.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Jun-11-10 09:47 AM   #8 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC