You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #28: Fair enough. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. Fair enough.
Mine was a knee-jerk reply.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Should progressives be angry about Sestak/Romanoff? CarlaLevin  Jun-03-10 10:03 AM   #0 
  - Politics is, in part, the power of persuasion. I don't like what  alfredo   Jun-03-10 10:08 AM   #1 
  - No, because in neither case did Obama do what the GOP is accusing him of doing. REAGAN DID!  HopeHoops   Jun-03-10 10:09 AM   #2 
  - I'm not angry about it. It's something that has been done for decades.  sinkingfeeling   Jun-03-10 10:09 AM   #3 
  - Is Sestak any better than a Republican?  Warpy   Jun-03-10 10:09 AM   #4 
  - Let me clarify.  CarlaLevin   Jun-03-10 10:14 AM   #10 
  - I know you are. But progressives aren't.  Iggo   Jun-03-10 10:10 AM   #5 
  - I'm a progressive, and I am.  donco6   Jun-03-10 11:05 AM   #24 
     - Fair enough.  Iggo   Jun-03-10 11:13 AM   #28 
        - It's an issue that's being confused by the RW, too.  donco6   Jun-03-10 11:16 AM   #29 
  - It's politics. Jeezus.  TwilightGardener   Jun-03-10 10:11 AM   #6 
  - And if a liberal party wont field a liberal candidate, politics also dictates voters will look away  Oregone   Jun-03-10 10:59 AM   #23 
  - Anyone angry about that should grow up.  DefenseLawyer   Jun-03-10 10:11 AM   #7 
  - I have no problem with party leaders backing candidates  CarlaLevin   Jun-03-10 10:21 AM   #13 
  - Don't get mad - get even. Vote for Romanoff...  eleny   Jun-03-10 10:12 AM   #8 
  - Why is my crap detector going off in blazes?  rurallib   Jun-03-10 10:14 AM   #9 
  - definitely did not get this news from Faux News  CarlaLevin   Jun-03-10 10:17 AM   #12 
  - If Fox is manufacturing outrage over this (and they are), that should give you pause.  emulatorloo   Jun-03-10 10:36 AM   #18 
     - That's not the point for me at all.  donco6   Jun-03-10 11:08 AM   #25 
     - People will vote the way they want to vote, so it will all work out in the end.  emulatorloo   Jun-04-10 11:18 AM   #34 
        - Thankfully, it will now.  donco6   Jun-04-10 11:32 AM   #35 
           - "that choice would have been eliminated by outside intervention" Romanoff and Sestak have free will  emulatorloo   Jun-04-10 11:47 AM   #36 
              - And that's good on them.  donco6   Jun-04-10 11:55 AM   #37 
                 - Romanoff sounds terrific!  emulatorloo   Jun-04-10 11:57 AM   #38 
     - By Issa's reasoning it would be illegal to make a job offer to ANYONE with an announced interest in  OregonBlue   Jun-03-10 11:54 AM   #31 
  - When people say, "Should we be angry?", they clearly want us to be angry.  TwilightGardener   Jun-03-10 10:24 AM   #15 
  - I don't think it's just a progressive issue.  alc   Jun-03-10 10:16 AM   #11 
  - definitely not just a progressive issue!  CarlaLevin   Jun-03-10 10:22 AM   #14 
  - I think you should prioritize your Anger-Units. Don't waste them on everything  emulatorloo   Jun-03-10 10:25 AM   #16 
  - +1  Celebration   Jun-03-10 10:30 AM   #17 
  - I think it is a bunch of manufactured crap because what  Bitwit1234   Jun-03-10 10:38 AM   #19 
  - GOP and Fox want to turn it into a Toomey win  emulatorloo   Jun-03-10 10:41 AM   #20 
  - It's a blatantly corrupt practice  notesdev   Jun-03-10 10:44 AM   #21 
  - I agree with your basic premise  zipplewrath   Jun-03-10 10:54 AM   #22 
  - The thing is, in this case, Romanoff has a really good shot.  donco6   Jun-03-10 11:10 AM   #27 
  - I believe this has been going on since the beginning of time so no, I'm not shocked or angry.  OregonBlue   Jun-03-10 11:09 AM   #26 
  - There is no perspective with the story.  krispos42   Jun-03-10 11:19 AM   #30 
  - Sestak isn't very progressive. In fact Specter's year as a Dem was more to the left than Sestak.  LynneSin   Jun-03-10 11:58 AM   #32 
  - No. Incumbents always stick up for other incumbents  eridani   Jun-04-10 06:02 AM   #33 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC