72. Were they supposed to ignore a Court order and not reply?
It is the Solicitor General's job to opine on matter touching federal jurisdiction...and FSIA fits that.
When you read the brief, the SC is not foreclosing on a finding of no immunity under an exception to FSIA....only that the 9th incorrectly applied Oregon law.
I agree--the Vatican makes me sick, too, but the SC shouldn't change its opinion on the law based on the disgustingness of the defendant....
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
