Time for change
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #50 |
| -Thoughts on the Obama Administration’s Efforts to Control the Gulf Oil Spill |
Time for change |
May-24-10 04:14 PM |
#0 |
 -
I rec'd this very thoughtful thread only to have it come to zero |
Lerkfish |
May-24-10 04:24 PM |
#1 |
 -
K&R |
Ruby the Liberal |
May-24-10 04:32 PM |
#4 |
 -
eh? |
BeFree |
May-24-10 04:35 PM |
#5 |
| -
That's not what I'm saying |
Time for change |
May-24-10 05:22 PM |
#10 |
| -
I say this, again |
BeFree |
May-24-10 06:06 PM |
#16 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-24-10 04:26 PM |
#2 |
| -
you didn't read it |
HughMoran |
May-24-10 04:39 PM |
#7 |
| -
Well done! |
Ruby the Liberal |
May-24-10 04:31 PM |
#3 |
| -
Great post and thanks for including the links |
SemiCharmedQuark |
May-24-10 04:37 PM |
#6 |
| -
K & R. Back up to 5. |
freddie mertz |
May-24-10 04:40 PM |
#8 |
| -
Fair analysis |
HughMoran |
May-24-10 04:40 PM |
#9 |
| -
Why do you feel the need to so excessively highlight your myriad criticisms of this administration? |
Number23 |
May-24-10 05:28 PM |
#11 |
| -
DU's version of 'street cred' |
grantcart |
May-24-10 05:48 PM |
#12 |
| -
He doesn't want to be thrown under the bus as a kool-aid drinker. |
berni_mccoy |
May-24-10 05:59 PM |
#13 |
| -
Why do you feel the need to be so excessively defensive of this administration? |
inna |
May-24-10 06:23 PM |
#19 |
| -
lol And why am I not at all surprised that you would be the only person to try and twist what I said |
Number23 |
May-24-10 07:07 PM |
#27 |
| -
You don't even make sense. Bye. |
inna |
May-24-10 08:06 PM |
#31 |
| -
You must have been looking in the mirror when you typed this. |
Number23 |
May-24-10 08:19 PM |
#32 |
| -
Thank you Inna |
Time for change |
May-24-10 08:30 PM |
#33 |
| -
I think that what you have to say about this is generally correct |
Time for change |
May-24-10 06:29 PM |
#21 |
| -
Thanks for this. |
Number23 |
May-24-10 07:15 PM |
#28 |
| -
Thank you. I need to clarify something |
Time for change |
May-25-10 05:21 AM |
#38 |
| -
"I don't think that the "reflexive need to catigate the President" is prevalent here." |
Number23 |
May-25-10 04:14 PM |
#52 |
| -
Fair enough. |
berni_mccoy |
May-24-10 06:00 PM |
#14 |
| -
On the BP thing, he's being too laid back. |
cornermouse |
May-24-10 06:06 PM |
#15 |
| -
I agree. |
Time for change |
May-25-10 07:43 AM |
#39 |
| -
The minute the Feds "take over" |
Karenina |
May-24-10 06:22 PM |
#17 |
| -
They (BP) will dump the expense on the taxpayer any way. |
cornermouse |
May-24-10 06:23 PM |
#18 |
| -
It would be great if BP is penalized severely for this. |
Time for change |
May-24-10 07:46 PM |
#30 |
| -
What efforts? |
sendero |
May-24-10 06:25 PM |
#20 |
| -
Obama's "indep't panel" on oil spill: look who's on it: Poppy Bush's William Reilly: |
amborin |
May-24-10 06:30 PM |
#22 |
| -
"We therefore must balance environmental risks with the nation’s energy requirements." |
Time for change |
May-24-10 07:41 PM |
#29 |
| -
Endured my first "Obama's Katrina" conversation today. |
hay rick |
May-24-10 06:32 PM |
#23 |
| -
K & R nt |
laughingliberal |
May-24-10 06:32 PM |
#24 |
| -
k&r |
Swamp Rat |
May-24-10 06:33 PM |
#25 |
| -
Sorry to burst your bubble, but...... |
backtomn |
May-24-10 06:36 PM |
#26 |
| -
I'll say this only once or perhaps a few dozen times more: every one of junior's |
indepat |
May-24-10 08:31 PM |
#34 |
| -
Oh, yes. Boy, do I agree with that. |
EFerrari |
May-24-10 08:41 PM |
#35 |
| -
I think you're right on target about the need to rid our agencies of entrenched ideologues. |
Time for change |
May-24-10 09:45 PM |
#37 |
| -
Rec'd if just for the thoughtfulness and gut-wrenching honesty n/t |
Catherina |
May-24-10 08:49 PM |
#36 |
| -
I agree with everything, except - |
donco6 |
May-25-10 07:54 AM |
#40 |
| -
I don't trust them either |
Time for change |
May-25-10 09:34 AM |
#42 |
| -
In the end, it's mostly semantics |
zipplewrath |
May-25-10 08:16 AM |
#41 |
| -
I agree with what you are saying but want to add this: |
truedelphi |
May-25-10 03:43 PM |
#50 |
| -
The fallicy of looking forward |
zipplewrath |
May-25-10 03:55 PM |
#51 |
| -
Not to accuse you of plagiarism, but I posted about the guiding philosophy of |
truedelphi |
May-26-10 01:35 AM |
#54 |
| -
So we're in violent agreement |
zipplewrath |
May-26-10 07:33 AM |
#55 |
| -
Yep, we violently AGREE |
truedelphi |
May-26-10 04:02 PM |
#58 |
| -
Yes, definitelty |
Time for change |
May-26-10 09:12 AM |
#56 |
| -
I don't agree with your conclusions this time. |
glitch |
May-25-10 09:43 AM |
#43 |
| -
I didn't mean to give the impression that we should allow BP to be in charge |
Time for change |
May-25-10 10:00 AM |
#44 |
| -
Obama did put together a scientific commission mid-May |
glitch |
May-25-10 11:08 AM |
#45 |
| -
Yes, we basically agree on what you say in the last paragraph of your post |
Time for change |
May-25-10 11:29 AM |
#46 |
| -
It's a start, I'll take it! |
glitch |
May-25-10 11:45 AM |
#47 |
| -
I do agree that BP is probably more interested in maximizing profits than in the consequences of |
Time for change |
May-25-10 12:26 PM |
#48 |
| -
They are aware of the benefits of PR and spending money on it as long as it appears to |
glitch |
May-25-10 01:23 PM |
#49 |
| -
I basically am with you on all that |
Time for change |
May-26-10 09:28 AM |
#57 |
| -
The video BP doesn't want you to see: Cousteau |
Dr.Phool |
May-25-10 09:48 PM |
#53 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread