You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: The Marketeers are at it again, "Re-brand" the war to make it more popular [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-07-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
14. The Marketeers are at it again, "Re-brand" the war to make it more popular
Clausewitz defined war "As the use of Force to force someone to do out will". Now he did this after several pages of thought as to what was "War", but he said it was a poor definition, but the only one he could come up with that takes in ALL the different types of war (including raids, blockades, the THREAT of other actions etc.). He even mention the horrors of war (death and destruction) but then while acknowledging such horrors, point out some military actions, minimized such horrors while other maximize them. Thus Vietnam was a "War", our embargo of Cuba is a "War" Vietnam and Korea were "Wars", what the US did in El Salvador and Nicaragua in the 1980s was "War" (as is what the US is doing in Columbia and Iraq today).

The problem is this War is unpopular, It is a "War" but something has to be done to make it more popular. Marketeers when facing such a problem on a consumer product try to "re-brand" such bad products by giving it a new image. Sometimes this requires a new name and packaging, thus the search for a "Czar" for the "War" and now this attempt to re-brand Iraq into something new. The term "Police Action" would be they first choice, but that term was used in Vietnam. The term has to be that shows the US is still trying to achieve its aims through the use of Force, but avoid the use of the term "War" or any term with "negative" connotations like "Force". Liberation is a another term to be avoid given its use in the first weeks of the war in the form of "Operation Iraqi Liberation" Which reduced to abbreviations become O.I.L. The war then became "Operation Iraqi Freedom". "Operation" is another term they want to avoid for it si to militaristic given its use in Desert Strom and other military operations.

Thus the search for a new name, to make the war in Iraq sound better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Moves afoot to change 'war' definition babylonsister  May-07-07 08:25 AM   #0 
  - I prefer the original name: "G. Dubya Two"  Xipe Totec   May-07-07 08:27 AM   #1 
  - Whatever happened to "Operation Iraqi Liberation" or OIL for short? n/t  NNN0LHI   May-07-07 08:29 AM   #2 
  - Five years later they are figuring this out?  Toots   May-07-07 08:30 AM   #3 
  - Maybe we should call it "King George's Sandbox" n/t  Raven   May-07-07 08:33 AM   #4 
  - However . . . if there's some formal redefinition of "war" . . .  MrModerate   May-07-07 08:35 AM   #5 
  - Of course they want the term "war" dropped.  Dhalgren   May-07-07 08:38 AM   #6 
  - Operation: Iraqi Reef  JHB   May-07-07 08:40 AM   #7 
  - 'bush dynasty conflict II'  Double T   May-07-07 08:42 AM   #8 
  - This is what can happen when a major Presidential candidate speaks out.  jsamuel   May-07-07 08:42 AM   #9 
  - Call is what is is: CRUSADE for republicon oil & munitions profits  SpiralHawk   May-07-07 08:44 AM   #10 
  - Neo-conflict  dave_p   May-07-07 08:49 AM   #11 
  - the Dems should call it what it really is -- OCCUPATION  Donnachaidh   May-07-07 08:51 AM   #12 
  - Call it what it is, an Invasion  liberal N proud   May-07-07 09:19 AM   #13 
  - The Marketeers are at it again, "Re-brand" the war to make it more popular  happyslug   May-07-07 09:31 AM   #14 
  - Iraq war has jumped the shark  Zywiec   May-07-07 09:34 AM   #15 
  - In a dramatic shift in policy the prez* today announced that the  Javaman   May-07-07 09:52 AM   #16 
  - Funny! I almost choked with laughter nt  conspirator   May-07-07 10:00 AM   #17 
  - Name change may confound the push for "Unitary President"  SteveM   May-07-07 03:15 PM   #18 
  - They're talking about the War on Terror, not the Iraq war.  yibbehobba   May-07-07 03:18 PM   #19 
  - Call it what they want but we are Losing  lovuian   May-07-07 03:27 PM   #20 
  - I said this in sept 2001  Marnieworld   May-07-07 03:29 PM   #21 
  - Al Qaeda-palooza.  wienerdoggie   May-07-07 03:30 PM   #22 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC