You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #91: i sympathize w/ you, but still disagree. especially after music & E. Asian lang. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
91. i sympathize w/ you, but still disagree. especially after music & E. Asian lang.
Edited on Tue May-11-10 11:56 PM by NuttyFluffers
my penmanship was always C grade, and oh how i hated it with a passion in elementary school...

however fine motor skills and structured reproduction being tested repeatedly to faster and faster levels has a very crucial element to other forms of learning in general. it's this level of rote learning that leads to muscle memory development where the mind is then freed up to do more processing tasks. when the mind is freed up then you can finesse skills you already have high levels of familiarity with, and then perceive where else to apply them.

handwriting very much falls into this category, as much as i want to dismiss it. and in an alphabetic script it may have less of a relation to parallel thinking or spatial development, but in pictographic (i.e. glyphic, ideographic, etc) scripts knowing the pieces and where they go quickly helps you understand the components of more complex graphic symbols -- and how to finesse them into greater shades of allegorical meaning.

it's the same reason i hated scales and arpeggios in music, but noticed that the kids who practiced these mundane exercises the most went on to be the better seated in the symphony. when you practice a scale so much the organizing principle substructure becomes second-nature; one could glance at key changes and not even have to think about which notes/fingerings to avoid. suddenly you are liberated into noticing overall patterns in musical structure, and given leeway to introduce diacritics to evoke a greater emotive work.

it does have a point, as much as my inner child grudgingly hates to admit it.

edit: i have noticed the same level of dedication to structural form reproduction in the beginning when dancers, painters, and martial artists are first taught the basics... it seems to be the very basis of all the arts and crafts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC