You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #70: So evidently you can't name any. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #63
70. So evidently you can't name any.
That's because there aren't any.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Why should DUers back Kagan? After reading these posts, I am sad beyond belief Elwood P Dowd  May-10-10 11:30 PM   #0 
  - The case for an extremely intelligent woman, not to mention a  saltpoint   May-10-10 11:37 PM   #1 
  - I might have been born at night, but  Elwood P Dowd   May-10-10 11:41 PM   #3 
  - Had you been, Elwood, I would have strongly praised your  saltpoint   May-10-10 11:56 PM   #8 
     - why not liz cheney? or phyllis schlafly? if being female is the most important thing?  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 12:06 AM   #13 
     - Gosh, Hannah. You sure do use naughty words a lot.  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:09 AM   #14 
     - you're the one who likes fucking kagan because she's a woman.  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 12:11 AM   #17 
     - I'm just blushing up a storm over here, Hannah.  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:12 AM   #19 
     - i have a problem with people who think sex, race or religion is the most salient  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 12:15 AM   #23 
     - It's one factor and an important one.  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:17 AM   #26 
        - it's not a damn bit important. it's a myth that tenure makes SC justices "unbeholden," sorry.  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 12:20 AM   #30 
           - I don't think Poppy would agree with you.  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:22 AM   #33 
              - lol. souter's "turn to the left" = nothing of the sort.  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 12:25 AM   #39 
                 - If you weigh out the 5-4 votes of recent years, you'll find Souter  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:29 AM   #42 
                    - the facts are clear; there are no liberals on the court. there are only the fascists (scalia)  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 12:37 AM   #51 
                    - Whoops. Sorry, Hannah. We disagree entirely.  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:41 AM   #55 
                    - I don't need to "cool down," as I'm neither hot nor angry, though you apparently try  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 12:46 AM   #60 
                    - I'll stand by the point. If you can name a Leftist president, I'll apologize.  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:47 AM   #62 
                       - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   May-11-10 12:48 AM   #64 
                       - that is not the issue  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 01:12 AM   #94 
                          - Whoops -- I said nothing of the sort about pressuring the Party or  saltpoint   May-11-10 01:21 AM   #98 
                          - dissent  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 04:46 PM   #132 
                    - Perfectly said.  lillypaddle   May-11-10 02:39 PM   #122 
                    - Every step forward taken by this nation, including its very formation, came from "the left".  Greyhound   May-11-10 02:52 PM   #125 
                       - I agree with you, which is why I vote the way I do for some decades, Greyhound.  saltpoint   May-12-10 09:02 AM   #149 
                          - But your position seems to be based on the false premise that that is how  Greyhound   May-12-10 01:41 PM   #152 
                             - Incorrect on my "position." I don't have a position insofar as a mechanism,  saltpoint   May-12-10 09:00 PM   #154 
                             - Understood. I'm not sold either way on her, and it is too early for judgment,  Greyhound   May-13-10 12:24 PM   #157 
                    - don't listen to this creature, Hannah Bell.  branders seine   May-11-10 09:23 AM   #115 
                       - I'm a real democrat  lillypaddle   May-11-10 02:41 PM   #123 
                          - I didn't tell you anything at all.  branders seine   May-11-10 02:53 PM   #126 
                          - Well, you said to Hannah Belle  lillypaddle   May-11-10 03:10 PM   #130 
                             - tell *her* that.  branders seine   May-11-10 03:17 PM   #131 
                             - well, sheesh  lillypaddle   May-11-10 06:32 PM   #136 
                          - Democrat has nothing to do with left/right. For the overwhelming majority of its history,  Greyhound   May-11-10 02:55 PM   #128 
                          - you could be right  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 04:51 PM   #133 
                    - ya never can tell  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 12:38 AM   # 
                       - That's for your separate thread. I think the real drama in High Court's  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:43 AM   #57 
                       - +100  Jefferson23   May-12-10 09:42 PM   #156 
     - let's hear them  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 12:15 AM   #24 
        - I don't jump through your hoops, dude. You could google it for all  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:19 AM   #28 
           - your blah blah doesn't make a case for kagan.  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 12:21 AM   #32 
           - The case for Kagan is on-line in various sources including this site,  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:23 AM   #35 
              - summers protegee. world bank. meteoric rise. all i need to know.  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 12:24 AM   #37 
              - It's also apparently all you DO know.  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:28 AM   #41 
                 - i don't give a damn about planned parenthood's rec. abortion is effectively  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 12:32 AM   #43 
                 - The people Planned Parenthood have genuinely and effectively assisted  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:44 AM   #59 
                    - Deleted message  Name removed   May-11-10 12:48 AM   #63 
                       - So evidently you can't name any.  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:51 AM   #70 
                          - Deleted message  Name removed   May-11-10 12:53 AM   #72 
                             - I do say so. Thanks.  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:58 AM   #80 
                             - yes mr T.  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 09:19 PM   #144 
                 - Y'Know  Tsiyu   May-11-10 06:35 PM   #137 
              - yes  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 12:28 AM   #40 
                 - You're free to investigate whatever you please. No one's stopping you.  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:38 AM   #52 
                    - you sure have wasted a lot of time saying nothing of substance, though.  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 12:43 AM   #56 
                    - To me, she is entirely qualified and the case for her as the next SCOTUS  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:47 AM   #61 
                       - Deleted message  Name removed   May-11-10 12:49 AM   #67 
                    - ok  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 12:54 AM   #73 
           - huh?  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 12:23 AM   #36 
     - boy comrade bell, the kagan pick sure has you in a teeth grinding mode!  dionysus   May-12-10 01:47 PM   #153 
     - you betcha  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 12:12 AM   #18 
        - You definitely need a new news source.  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:14 AM   #22 
           - did you really miss what I said?  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 12:20 AM   #31 
              - Again, if you want to play hula hoops, go outside. I don't do your hoops.  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:25 AM   #38 
                 - I haven't argued anything  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 12:32 AM   #44 
                 - very weak. she's smart. she's a woman. obama picked her. that's all i need.  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 12:35 AM   #46 
                    - If that's all you need, it's not much to run on, and it won't win you  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:49 AM   #66 
                       - Deleted message  Name removed   May-11-10 12:50 AM   #69 
                       - If you are interested in a dialogue, Hannah, I'm still up and the candle  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:53 AM   #71 
                          - Deleted message  Name removed   May-11-10 12:54 AM   #74 
                       - You are not interested in dialog, this much is clear to all who read this thread  Moochy   May-12-10 09:23 AM   #151 
                          - Yep. You'll have to settle for me.  saltpoint   May-12-10 09:03 PM   #155 
                 - he's not pouting, & has expressed no anger. hmm, why would you say he has?  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 12:34 AM   #45 
                    - missed that  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 12:36 AM   #50 
                       - not only pouting, but "pouting through your anger" - now there's a trick.  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 12:41 AM   #54 
                          - typically dishonsest debate tactics from The Blind Booster Crew  Moochy   May-11-10 09:33 AM   #117 
                             - Deleted message  Name removed   May-11-10 10:27 PM   #145 
     - ABSOLUTELY!  havocmom   May-11-10 09:20 AM   #114 
        - thanks for that. you seem to be one of only a few who agree on that point.  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 10:32 PM   #146 
           - oh, say Condi Rice for example  havocmom   May-11-10 11:11 PM   #148 
     - !  Starbucks Anarchist   May-11-10 12:49 AM   #68 
  - sure  William Z. Foster   May-10-10 11:53 PM   #6 
  - According to news sources, Condi was not nominated.  saltpoint   May-10-10 11:57 PM   #9 
     - lol  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 12:10 AM   #15 
        - As it happens, the President does in fact select SCOTUS nominees.  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:11 AM   #16 
           - with the advice & consent of his -- ahem -- backers & funders.  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 12:13 AM   #20 
              - Don't disenfranchise yourself.  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:16 AM   #25 
                 - his advisors & backers have made their choice, you mean.  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 12:17 AM   #27 
                    - No, it is not what I meant and it isn't what I typed.  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:20 AM   #29 
                       - so what? it's a lousy choice. it's the choice of international finance capital.  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 12:23 AM   #34 
                       - Well it sounds like you're living a doomsday scenario.  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:56 AM   #76 
                          - Deleted message  Name removed   May-11-10 12:57 AM   #77 
                             - Yet the Kagan nomination is what has you in particular off the tracks.  saltpoint   May-11-10 01:00 AM   #83 
                                - Deleted message  Name removed   May-11-10 01:09 AM   #93 
                                   - So do Bonnie Raitt and Nina Simone recordings, both of which  saltpoint   May-11-10 01:24 AM   #99 
                                      - Deleted message  Name removed   May-11-10 01:44 AM   #104 
                                      - I like all of her albums. Late. Early. All of it. The first two especially,  saltpoint   May-11-10 01:52 AM   #105 
                                      - interesting how most of my comments got deleted, including this totally innocuous one  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 07:31 PM   #138 
                                         - You've stumbled onto  Moochy   May-12-10 09:15 AM   #150 
                       - Deleted message  Name removed   May-11-10 12:35 AM   #47 
                          - If it were pathetic I don't think Obama would be on the verge of  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:55 AM   #75 
                             - not talking about Obama or Kagan  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 12:58 AM   #79 
                                - Both of which stand unless there's some counterpoint which eclipses  saltpoint   May-11-10 01:01 AM   #85 
                                   - sure  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 01:04 AM   #89 
                                      - Pittsburgh is a great town. I hope we can agree on that.  saltpoint   May-11-10 01:07 AM   #91 
                                         - I want to destroy the right wing  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 01:15 AM   #96 
                                            - That's not reversible and needs to be, WZF. There is what other  saltpoint   May-11-10 01:26 AM   #101 
                                               - I give  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 01:36 AM   #102 
                                                  - Deleted message  Name removed   May-11-10 01:43 AM   #103 
                                                  - sure is.  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 07:33 PM   #139 
  - The more Im reading on Elena Kagan,  ultracase24   May-11-10 12:14 AM   #21 
     - Kagan's ideological disposition is less formed than other potential  saltpoint   May-11-10 12:58 AM   #78 
        - true for Clarence Thomas as well  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 12:59 AM   #82 
        - Agree, not that it's news. The application holds for ALL Justices.  saltpoint   May-11-10 01:03 AM   #88 
        - Goldman Sachs advisor during the bankster meltdown.  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 01:03 AM   #87 
        - Not disqualifying. Not even illegal.  saltpoint   May-11-10 01:05 AM   #90 
        - rigged processes usually do. prevail, i mean.  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 01:20 AM   #97 
        - This alone should disqualify her.  gmoney   May-11-10 09:35 AM   #118 
        - a lot is not known about her except she is a Washington insider  ultracase24   May-11-10 01:09 AM   #92 
  - Triangulating  depakid   May-10-10 11:40 PM   #2 
  - Don Siegelman is long since forgotten, now that  QC   May-10-10 11:51 PM   #4 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   May-11-10 12:36 AM   #49 
  - Yes, everything changed and yet nothing changed?  QC   May-11-10 12:59 AM   #81 
     - not yet ..but we have had bad bad air to breathe..now winds have taken the stink away..for now  flyarm   May-11-10 01:14 AM   #95 
        - With you on the coast, and with you in your anger towards the corporations & their apologists  rudy23   May-11-10 10:52 AM   #120 
  - I have not forgotten.. . . n/t  annabanana   May-11-10 09:16 PM   #143 
  - Her job as Soliciter General is to represent the position of the US Governement  housewolf   May-10-10 11:52 PM   #5 
  - True, but then how do we know her personal views?  SlipperySlope   May-11-10 12:01 AM   #10 
  - here's one clue:  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 04:53 AM   #108 
  - Personal views are soft information, nobody can know them for certain except the person who has them  Hippo_Tron   May-11-10 02:48 PM   #124 
  - Good point. However it is a sad reminder the Obama is carrying forward  avaistheone1   May-11-10 12:35 AM   #48 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   May-11-10 12:39 AM   #53 
     - Never read Strauss. Is there a particular work of his where this happens?  avaistheone1   May-11-10 12:44 AM   #58 
        - it used to be on all the Project of the New American Century stuff..  flyarm   May-11-10 01:24 AM   #100 
  - that could be said of every Republican  William Z. Foster   May-11-10 01:02 AM   #86 
  - Yup, people quoting her cases as SG (both positive and negative) keep forgetting that.  Jennicut   May-11-10 03:01 PM   #129 
  - Obama will protect the Bush crew at all costs  MannyGoldstein   May-10-10 11:54 PM   #7 
  - Someone is keeping a seat warm for him at the Carlyle table. nt  Lorien   May-11-10 01:01 AM   #84 
  - But today Sean Hannity told me that she's a radical liberal.  progressoid   May-11-10 12:03 AM   #11 
  - no, she's TRIANGULATED  JCMach1   May-11-10 12:05 AM   #12 
  - It's called "gaming the ref"  glitch   May-11-10 09:15 AM   #113 
  - And Savage Weiner says she's a "red diaper doper baby"  gmoney   May-11-10 09:37 AM   #119 
  - This DUer doesn't.  TexasObserver   May-11-10 12:49 AM   #65 
  - As Solicitor General, her job is to argue for Obama's policy. So your disagreement  pnwmom   May-11-10 03:40 AM   #106 
  - actually, in her comments to graham during the vetting, she agreed with  Hannah Bell   May-11-10 06:19 AM   #110 
     - What does that have to do with the Siegelman case, the topic of the OP?  pnwmom   May-11-10 02:20 PM   #121 
  - There has not been a REAL LIBERAL appointed since Marshall  old mark   May-11-10 03:53 AM   #107 
  - John Marshall.... n/t  Davis_X_Machina   May-11-10 06:58 AM   #111 
  - Bottom line, they shouldn't  mmonk   May-11-10 04:59 AM   #109 
  - I wish that I could rec this more than once.  tnlefty   May-11-10 09:11 AM   #112 
  - DUers are a monolithic bloc? Still, DUers don't have to back Kagan  ProSense   May-11-10 09:29 AM   #116 
  - Because at the end of the day she will probably vote with Breyer, Ginsburg, and Sotomayor  Hippo_Tron   May-11-10 02:55 PM   #127 
  - We are supposed to back her because the president said to.  QC   May-11-10 05:08 PM   #134 
  - She is the best this Administration would allow. She is too conservative for me but  saracat   May-11-10 06:28 PM   #135 
  - Kagan is no Justice Stevens, she signs briefs arguing for unitary executive power re Gitmo, etc. n/  2 Much Tribulation   May-11-10 08:53 PM   #140 
  - Obama and the "Centrist" Democratic Party Leadership WILL be successful...  bvar22   May-11-10 09:14 PM   #141 
  - I don't. nt  LWolf   May-11-10 09:15 PM   #142 
  - I still say she's a witch  jpak   May-11-10 10:35 PM   #147 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC