You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #111: "Criminalization is sometimes the only thing that has an effect." [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #102
111. "Criminalization is sometimes the only thing that has an effect."
Edited on Sat May-08-10 07:23 PM by mike_c
Ultimately, my point is that criminalization has NOT had the desired effect. If it had, our prisons would not be full of drug users.

I'm confused-- have you had any direct experience with people who use narcotics? I'm thinking specifically about heroin and other opiate derivatives. You make it sound like they turn into raving monsters who'll kill their grandmothers for their next fix. That is, unfortunately, the cartoon version that law enforcement and national policy makers have promulgated for decades, but it isn't true, by and large.

SOME heroin users are party animals who get in way over their heads. Exactly the same thing happens with drinkers. Some are social drug users who do it occasionally, more like raver types (the general phenomenon, not any specific connection between raves and narcotics-- just an analogy). Ditto for drinkers. Some are quite, functioning junkies, using their dope and then going to work in the morning, just like everyone else. Some are what I think of as wastoids from the beginning, the sort of people who don't so much fall into the bottle-- or the dime bag-- so much as propel themselves full force into the most degraded state they can achieve. Junkies don't have any lock on that franchise. My ex was an alcoholic who did far more damage to her "body and mind" than most "hard" drug users I've known.

The truth is that most drug users are just like most drinkers, a circumstance that makes sense because they're ALL drug users. We look the other way, for the most part, when their drug of choice is alcohol, but like you, many people construe that to mean that there is some massive qualitative difference between skin-poping a little horse after work and having a few stiff drinks every night. I mean, sure, the experience is different, but the long term effects, the social effects, etc are not very different at all-- or they wouldn't be, if not for law enforcement and the criminalization of whole segments of society. And marijuana, the drug that is largely fueling this debate currently, is downright benign. Know anyone who abuses their prescription narcotics? You probably know several. Have they turned into raving maniacs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC