Kalun D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-07-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #87 |
| 90. This Is Not About Belief |
| -Obama Top Recipient of BP Oil Campaign $$$$$ |
amborin |
May-06-10 08:57 PM |
#0 |
 -
Yeah! So what? |
ncteechur |
May-06-10 08:59 PM |
#1 |
  -
maybe it explains why BP got exempted from EIS, and why Obama switched to a pro-drilling position |
amborin |
May-06-10 09:01 PM |
#4 |
| -
Very disappointing...my firs thought on hearing this was it was another Bush policy... |
joeybee12 |
May-07-10 11:34 AM |
#76 |
| -
Okay. |
Drunken Irishman |
May-06-10 09:00 PM |
#2 |
| -
71 thooooooooooooooouuuuuuusand dollars |
underpants |
May-06-10 09:01 PM |
#3 |
| -
lolol |
HughMoran |
May-06-10 09:08 PM |
#11 |
| -
And the point is? |
jaxx |
May-06-10 09:02 PM |
#5 |
| -
BP's project would have been prohibited had an EIS been conducted |
amborin |
May-06-10 09:05 PM |
#7 |
| -
Okay, I just went back and read your response more thoroughly explaining this. |
gateley |
May-06-10 09:08 PM |
#9 |
| -
that's great ! |
amborin |
May-06-10 09:13 PM |
#16 |
| -
I've been so disappointment in so many of his choices, but thought he probably |
gateley |
May-06-10 09:23 PM |
#25 |
| -
agree |
amborin |
May-06-10 09:24 PM |
#26 |
| -
Think we'll see either? (Actually, the Fed needs to GO, IMO). nt |
gateley |
May-06-10 09:27 PM |
#28 |
| -
only if enough people hear about it, and demand answers |
amborin |
May-06-10 09:29 PM |
#30 |
| -
Then I'm going to send your links to Rachel, Keith, and Ed -- they do a good job |
gateley |
May-06-10 09:31 PM |
#32 |
| -
great, thanks! |
amborin |
May-06-10 09:33 PM |
#33 |
| -
I missed that -- hope my e-mail (and your links) nudge him to do it again. This |
gateley |
May-06-10 10:01 PM |
#51 |
| -
agree |
amborin |
May-06-10 10:25 PM |
#53 |
| -
I am going to start a Salazar to be fired posting. Here I go..... |
glinda |
May-06-10 09:33 PM |
#36 |
| -
I always find fault with these things (unless they're damning to Republicans, |
gateley |
May-06-10 09:05 PM |
#6 |
| -
there appears to be a double standard and you articulated it well |
amborin |
May-06-10 09:10 PM |
#12 |
| -
Everyone's views are colored by their prejudices. For example, someone who called Obama a "freeper" |
SemiCharmedQuark |
May-06-10 09:42 PM |
#42 |
| -
+1 |
NaturalHigh |
May-06-10 09:43 PM |
#43 |
| -
$77,000 out of $260,000,000... |
druidity33 |
May-07-10 06:33 AM |
#70 |
| -
More observations |
Kalun D |
May-07-10 10:55 PM |
#91 |
| -
+1000 |
amborin |
May-08-10 11:21 AM |
#94 |
| -
Open government |
tavalon |
May-07-10 03:16 AM |
#68 |
| -
exactly; different set of standards suddenly with |
amborin |
May-07-10 11:21 AM |
#73 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-06-10 09:06 PM |
#8 |
| -
yes because Democrats never question other Democrats right |
subsuelo |
May-06-10 10:01 PM |
#52 |
| -
Politico shows how not to report on campaign contributions |
babylonsister |
May-06-10 09:08 PM |
#10 |
| -
I'd love to blame BP too, but I think it was more Halliburton at work. |
Rex |
May-06-10 09:11 PM |
#13 |
| -
BULL FU*KING SH*T |
Kalun D |
May-07-10 02:32 AM |
#62 |
| -
Well you blame who you want to in your tirade and I will pick who |
Rex |
May-07-10 03:00 PM |
#87 |
| -
This Is Not About Belief |
Kalun D |
May-07-10 10:49 PM |
#90 |
| -
More Facts |
Kalun D |
May-08-10 07:30 PM |
#99 |
| -
+1000 |
amborin |
May-09-10 12:25 PM |
#101 |
| -
on Ed Shultz's radio program today |
CatWoman |
May-06-10 09:11 PM |
#14 |
| -
i think that's splitting hairs |
amborin |
May-06-10 09:16 PM |
#17 |
| -
I strongly disagree |
CatWoman |
May-06-10 09:18 PM |
#18 |
| -
The trouble lies in the bundling of contributions |
depakid |
May-06-10 09:18 PM |
#19 |
| -
They are all in bed together, literally. |
FreeJG |
May-06-10 09:12 PM |
#15 |
| -
I prefer the mediamatters take on this. |
NYC_SKP |
May-06-10 09:18 PM |
#20 |
| -
thank you |
CatWoman |
May-06-10 09:20 PM |
#21 |
| -
do you think exempting BP from the required Environmental Impact Study was OK? |
amborin |
May-06-10 09:21 PM |
#23 |
| -
I don't think relying on Politico's false reporting is going to help anything. |
SemiCharmedQuark |
May-06-10 09:25 PM |
#27 |
| -
the article is not from Politico; and it raises serious concerns; why was BP exempted? |
amborin |
May-06-10 09:28 PM |
#29 |
| -
The blog post cites an article based on Politico's slanted reporting |
SemiCharmedQuark |
May-06-10 09:33 PM |
#34 |
| -
Open Secrets reports it, too; and many news outlets; same with the exemption |
amborin |
May-06-10 09:35 PM |
#38 |
| -
They report that Obama exempted BP because of 70,000 dollars? No. |
SemiCharmedQuark |
May-06-10 09:37 PM |
#39 |
| -
Bullsh*t |
Kalun D |
May-07-10 02:44 AM |
#64 |
| -
Geithner has lied repeatedly to Congress, |
truedelphi |
May-07-10 03:13 AM |
#67 |
| -
+1000 |
amborin |
May-07-10 11:18 AM |
#72 |
| -
Not All |
Kalun D |
May-07-10 02:39 AM |
#63 |
| -
Of course not. And one has nothing to do with the other. |
NYC_SKP |
May-06-10 09:33 PM |
#35 |
| -
would people think this was ok if it concerned a repub? doubtful; corporate donations to Bush have |
amborin |
May-06-10 09:37 PM |
#40 |
| -
Not a corporate donation. It was donations by people that work for BP |
SemiCharmedQuark |
May-06-10 09:39 PM |
#41 |
| -
How many times is this same shit going to get posted? Give it up. |
Pirate Smile |
May-06-10 09:20 PM |
#22 |
| -
this is the first I've seen it, and it's important; we're facing an ecological catastrophe |
amborin |
May-06-10 09:22 PM |
#24 |
| -
Really? You didn't know about this until now? |
namahage |
May-06-10 09:51 PM |
#46 |
| -
ROFLOL! |
SemiCharmedQuark |
May-06-10 09:53 PM |
#49 |
| -
Well done... |
SidDithers |
May-07-10 02:00 AM |
#59 |
| -
OMG. So he/she really DID know this was posted before. Good grief. |
DevonRex |
May-07-10 12:29 PM |
#81 |
| -
Ideologically I am kinda on your side |
tkmorris |
May-07-10 02:07 AM |
#61 |
| -
"smacked down" not at all; the truth is hard to accept |
amborin |
May-07-10 11:27 AM |
#74 |
| -
Well, Jane Hamsher hadn't weighed in yet. We were all waiting, with bated breath... |
Tarheel_Dem |
May-06-10 09:30 PM |
#31 |
| -
nothing has been refuted; an investigation is needed into the exemption |
amborin |
May-06-10 09:34 PM |
#37 |
| -
Desperate much? |
ProSense |
May-06-10 09:43 PM |
#44 |
| -
I think there should be an investigation, but only because this was a huge disaster. |
SemiCharmedQuark |
May-06-10 09:44 PM |
#45 |
| -
glad you agree there needs to be an investigation! |
amborin |
May-06-10 09:52 PM |
#47 |
| -
Where was it refuted? If you mean that now we don't count |
sabrina 1 |
May-06-10 10:00 PM |
#50 |
| -
agree; |
amborin |
May-06-10 10:31 PM |
#54 |
| -
PUT ON YOUR CORPORATE TELEVISION BLINDERS EVERYONE |
Kalun D |
May-07-10 02:47 AM |
#65 |
| -
I fail to see the importance of this, aart from the coincidental nature of it |
Stinky The Clown |
May-06-10 09:53 PM |
#48 |
| -
you don't see the importance of the exemption? |
amborin |
May-06-10 10:33 PM |
#55 |
| -
Gimme a break. I'm tryin' to earn back some creds with the local Kool Kids |
Stinky The Clown |
May-08-10 06:35 PM |
#95 |
| -
He lifted the ban on Offshore drilling. |
sabrina 1 |
May-07-10 01:04 AM |
#56 |
| -
+1000 |
amborin |
May-07-10 11:16 AM |
#71 |
| -
His administration |
The Old Creak |
May-07-10 11:32 AM |
#75 |
| -
Because he was 'calling the bluff of the right' |
Strelnikov_ |
May-07-10 12:27 PM |
#80 |
| -
I'm not sure what all that has to do with Obama |
sabrina 1 |
May-08-10 02:57 AM |
#92 |
| -
suddenly, b/c it's "our" guy, all standards are gone; Obama's sudden embrace of "drill, baby, drill" |
amborin |
May-08-10 07:14 PM |
#97 |
| -
Gimme a break. I'm tryin' to earn back some creds with the local Kool Kids |
Stinky The Clown |
May-08-10 06:36 PM |
#96 |
| -
i'm afraid that |
amborin |
May-08-10 07:16 PM |
#98 |
| -
K&R for the realists - got it back to +1. (nt) |
ConsAreLiars |
May-07-10 01:14 AM |
#57 |
| -
K/R #3 |
emilyg |
May-07-10 01:48 AM |
#58 |
| -
Unrec for being deliberatly misleading...nt |
SidDithers |
May-07-10 02:01 AM |
#60 |
| -
And if republicans reclaim the House....... |
thelordofhell |
May-07-10 03:00 AM |
#66 |
| -
k & r |
girl gone mad |
May-07-10 04:20 AM |
#69 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
May-07-10 11:49 AM |
#77 |
| -
Great! Obama has been legally Bribed... expect very little to happen to BP now |
fascisthunter |
May-07-10 11:54 AM |
#78 |
| -
Unrec for a misleading post |
NJmaverick |
May-07-10 11:55 AM |
#79 |
| -
And unrecced for saying he/she didn't know it had already been posted. |
DevonRex |
May-07-10 12:30 PM |
#82 |
| -
Unrecced for the flaming panties... and... |
JuniperLea |
May-07-10 12:39 PM |
#83 |
| -
for the truth |
amborin |
May-07-10 02:31 PM |
#85 |
| -
? |
amborin |
May-07-10 02:30 PM |
#84 |
| -
You have to admit, tho, it was pretty funny... |
SidDithers |
May-07-10 02:59 PM |
#86 |
| -
It was funny. Jon is right again! nt |
DevonRex |
May-07-10 03:31 PM |
#88 |
| -
And he just told them to clean up their own damn mess to... |
and-justice-for-all |
May-07-10 03:33 PM |
#89 |
| -
Makes you wonder |
jeanpalmer |
May-08-10 03:39 AM |
#93 |
| -
Obama nominated BP for "outstanding safety and pollution prevention" |
amborin |
May-09-10 12:25 PM |
#100 |
| -
The drill policy and cozy BP relationship is BS... sorry if you believe the man benevolent |
gov for sale |
May-09-10 01:13 PM |
#102 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread