You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: Yes! Great catch--"silly and ridiculous" does not mean "untrue" nt [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Yes! Great catch--"silly and ridiculous" does not mean "untrue" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -WH: Idea that BP Given Special Exemption Because of Campaign Cash to Obama Silly and Ridiculous ProSense  May-06-10 07:03 PM   #0 
  - Nevertheless, the implication is there  depakid   May-06-10 07:09 PM   #1 
  - Ridiculous.  ProSense   May-06-10 07:12 PM   #2 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   May-06-10 07:36 PM   #10 
     - What's ridicuous is to read spin that ignores a fundamental reality of the American political system  depakid   May-06-10 09:07 PM   #23 
        - "If this were the Bush administration, you and others would be screaming bloody murder ...  ProSense   May-06-10 09:15 PM   #25 
           - I don't expect objectivity from you on this or any point relating (even remotely) to Obama  depakid   May-06-10 09:32 PM   #26 
              - Deleted message  Name removed   May-06-10 09:38 PM   #28 
              - Nor do I expect propriety or much sense of maturity based on the nature of your posts  depakid   May-06-10 09:40 PM   #30 
                 - Don't make me laugh. n/t  ProSense   May-06-10 09:53 PM   #33 
              - $76.5 million from elite bundlers is what O got  amborin   May-07-10 12:42 AM   #40 
                 - That fact alone doesn't prove a point re: allegations of favoritism, etc.  depakid   May-07-10 02:57 AM   #42 
  - yes. it is silly and ridiculous that we have a system of governance  branders seine   May-06-10 07:12 PM   #3 
  - "funded by bribes "  ProSense   May-06-10 07:14 PM   #4 
  - Every campaign contribution is a bribe.  branders seine   May-06-10 07:19 PM   #5 
     - "Otherwise, corporations and their lobbyists wouldn't do it. " What?  ProSense   May-06-10 07:22 PM   #7 
        - So BP did not donate to Obama?  branders seine   May-06-10 07:24 PM   #8 
        - Americans kept Republicans out of the WH.  girl gone mad   May-06-10 07:39 PM   #13 
  - Yes! Great catch--"silly and ridiculous" does not mean "untrue" nt  rudy23   May-06-10 07:37 PM   #11 
  - It's called bundling.  ipaint   May-06-10 08:41 PM   #17 
     - "It's called bundling." $71, 000 in bundling?  ProSense   May-06-10 08:44 PM   #18 
        - I was replying to post 3 about the general system of campaign finance.  ipaint   May-06-10 08:47 PM   #21 
  - Nobody mentions Halliburton who was implicated as the cementer of the rig  Rosa Luxemburg   May-06-10 07:19 PM   #6 
  - Shhhhh  HughMoran   May-06-10 07:39 PM   #12 
  - Of course not  underpants   May-06-10 08:46 PM   #20 
  - What pisses me off is that some people on DU propogate those misleading reports  still_one   May-06-10 07:32 PM   #9 
  - +1...nt  SidDithers   May-07-10 02:09 AM   #41 
  - He raised what 100's of millions and he is going to be swayed  WCGreen   May-06-10 07:42 PM   #14 
  - It's a special $71,000  ProSense   May-06-10 08:20 PM   #15 
     - You are implying that it's BPs $71K against $779 million in other contributions as if  hulka38   May-06-10 09:34 PM   #27 
        - "$71,000 buys you some favor in any administration." What?  ProSense   May-06-10 09:40 PM   #29 
           - $71K from any group  hulka38   May-06-10 09:50 PM   #31 
           - Group? Employees do not donate as a group.  ProSense   May-06-10 09:52 PM   #32 
              - Maybe he's not aware that BP employees donated a good chunk of cash to him.  hulka38   May-06-10 10:21 PM   #34 
                 - You really think that he is that Venal, that for the cost of one modest  WCGreen   May-07-10 12:30 AM   #35 
           - It's actually hilarious to watch you arguing that money from big business  Marr   May-07-10 12:36 AM   #37 
  - Who is number 2? nt  ipaint   May-06-10 08:34 PM   #16 
  - Goldman Sachs  ProSense   May-06-10 08:46 PM   #19 
     - It certainly bought them a few positions in the administration.  ipaint   May-06-10 08:57 PM   #22 
     - Oh, yes-- the Obama Administration has been very hard on Goldman Sachs.  Marr   May-07-10 12:39 AM   #38 
  - I don't understand this. By some DUers' logic, if you have a job  Arkana   May-06-10 09:11 PM   #24 
  - Was your contribution bundled or not?  girl gone mad   May-07-10 12:35 AM   #36 
  - Obama got $76,500,000 or $76.5 million from elite bundlers  amborin   May-07-10 12:41 AM   #39 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC