JoeyT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-10 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
They just have to suspect you might at some point maybe commit a crime. Then in a lot of places it's handed over to a lawyer that gets a share of the money to argue, if you're allowed to sue to get your seized possessions back at all. There have been tons of cases where someone was carrying more money than a policeman thought they should have had. That's ALL it takes.
Of course even if you don't bother with asset forfeiture, eminent domain is enough to argue that the government seizing privately owned property isn't unconstitutional.
|