karynnj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-04-10 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 16. Think more how they regulate landline based telephony |
|
not content. The question was the FCC rethinking the Bush era designation of the Internet as an information provider rather than as a network on which the information passes.
The fact is that the bit torrent problem could be handled under either designation. There is no reason that under regulation the only fee has to be unlimited service.
|
| -Obama FCC Expected to Abandon Net Neutrality, Universal Internet |
Echo In Light |
May-04-10 10:34 AM |
#0 |
-
If Obama knows what's good for him |
rocktivity |
May-04-10 10:40 AM |
#1 |
 -
What's good for Wall Street and corporate America is good for President Obama |
Better Believe It |
May-04-10 10:58 AM |
#9 |
-
For one term, anyway. |
WinkyDink |
May-04-10 11:16 AM |
#23 |
-
Sometimes it is stunning what this administration is doing |
MadHound |
May-04-10 10:40 AM |
#2 |
 -
Do we even know this as fact yet? |
madokie |
May-04-10 10:43 AM |
#5 |
-
if "net neutrality" works anything like the way I'm forced to pay for Benny Hinn if I want cable... |
Romulox |
May-04-10 10:41 AM |
#3 |
 -
Fortunately for you, you're way off base. |
Occulus |
May-04-10 10:55 AM |
#7 |
  -
Wait a minute. What about stuff like bit torrent, streaming movies (over commercial services) etc.? |
Romulox |
May-04-10 11:00 AM |
#10 |
 -
There's tons and tons of bandwidth available, don't know why streaming is an issue |
uponit7771 |
May-04-10 11:03 AM |
#15 |
  -
That bandwidth is "available" because all customers are required to pay upwards of $60/month |
Romulox |
May-04-10 11:42 AM |
#32 |
 -
You're missing the point; currently, the network itself doesn't care. |
Occulus |
May-04-10 12:01 PM |
#37 |
  -
Electronic Arts, Stardock, and Steam are all COMMERCIAL services. That is precisely the point. |
Romulox |
May-05-10 09:18 AM |
#51 |
 -
And how do you feel about single payer health care? |
GoneOffShore |
May-04-10 09:54 PM |
#47 |
 -
Strongly in favor. This "net neutrality" is closer to Obama's triangulated "HCR"--mandated private |
Romulox |
May-05-10 09:19 AM |
#52 |
 -
Actual Obama Basher quote "....facts are wrong..." |
uponit7771 |
May-04-10 11:01 AM |
#11 |
-
The new 'bidness friendly' Democratic party? nt |
laughingliberal |
May-04-10 10:42 AM |
#4 |
-
I'm starting to believe the president is following a script written before he ran. |
whatchamacallit |
May-04-10 10:51 AM |
#6 |
 -
So am I. And it would explain much about his fast-track to the WH. |
WinkyDink |
May-04-10 11:18 AM |
#26 |
-
Here is my thought |
Tailormyst |
May-04-10 11:47 AM |
#34 |
-
To be fair, however, that is applicable to any "electable" prez candidate |
Echo In Light |
May-04-10 01:08 PM |
#38 |
-
Absolutely |
Tailormyst |
May-04-10 09:48 PM |
#45 |
-
You know, I've never liked the idea of the FCC controlling the Internet anyway. |
Xithras |
May-04-10 10:57 AM |
#8 |
 -
Think more how they regulate landline based telephony |
karynnj |
May-04-10 11:07 AM |
#16 |
-
But even looking that way, you find issues. |
Xithras |
May-04-10 11:29 AM |
#28 |
-
the decision not to treat ISPs as subject to Title II regulation goes back to 1998 |
onenote |
May-04-10 11:34 AM |
#31 |
-
Thanks for the correction |
karynnj |
May-04-10 11:55 AM |
#36 |
-
As I read it, unnamed sources say "leaning toward". |
LiberalAndProud |
May-04-10 11:02 AM |
#12 |
 -
Standard trial balloon. Just like they were "leaning toward" abandoning the Public Option. |
jgraz |
May-04-10 11:10 AM |
#19 |
-
+1 |
Echo In Light |
May-04-10 11:15 AM |
#22 |
-
k&R yet another betrayal |
amborin |
May-04-10 11:02 AM |
#13 |
 -
Sorry, but this is not just "another betrayal". This is Obama putting an end to democracy. |
jgraz |
May-04-10 11:09 AM |
#17 |
-
you're right; "another betrayal" doesn't begin to capture what's occurring |
amborin |
May-04-10 11:11 AM |
#20 |
-
It ought to be like the TELEPHONE: UNIVERSAL, and transmitting ANY message. |
WinkyDink |
May-04-10 11:17 AM |
#25 |
-
I feel so hopeful! n/t |
QC |
May-04-10 11:03 AM |
#14 |
-
Obama continues to act like a Clinton-Republican |
upi402 |
May-04-10 11:09 AM |
#18 |
 -
Obama governs to the right of Nixon |
amborin |
May-04-10 11:13 AM |
#21 |
  -
Nixon [gulp] did a lot, and wanted to fight the drug war... |
upi402 |
May-04-10 11:23 AM |
#27 |
 -
"socialism" == "untrammeled, un-regulated, neo-liberal capitalism" |
amborin |
May-04-10 11:29 AM |
#29 |
 -
upi402 = no party |
upi402 |
May-04-10 11:54 AM |
#35 |
 -
by abandoning democratic (lower case 'd') principles |
amborin |
May-04-10 04:11 PM |
#40 |
 -
I feel a little compassion for the Big Dog. |
bvar22 |
May-04-10 02:22 PM |
#39 |
-
LOL! |
amborin |
May-04-10 04:12 PM |
#41 |
-
for all those in a lather about the end of democracy |
onenote |
May-04-10 11:17 AM |
#24 |
 -
FUCK FACTS!!! /sarcasm |
uponit7771 |
May-04-10 11:32 AM |
#30 |
 -
Yep, congress is to blame. |
JoeyT |
May-04-10 09:17 PM |
#44 |
-
Can't say as I am surprised |
Tailormyst |
May-04-10 11:46 AM |
#33 |
-
Bump |
Echo In Light |
May-04-10 05:03 PM |
#42 |
-
Thanks for posting this! Keep the pressure going! -nt |
scentopine |
May-04-10 08:35 PM |
#43 |
 -
+1 |
Echo In Light |
May-05-10 08:35 AM |
#49 |
-
They may be known by the lengths to which they will go in tying themselves into knots to defend .... |
Stinky The Clown |
May-04-10 09:51 PM |
#46 |
-
K&R |
Wednesdays |
May-04-10 10:55 PM |
#48 |
-
Kick and Recommend -- This would be an unacceptable flip flop. |
Armstead |
May-05-10 08:45 AM |
#50 |