You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #64: Thanks for proving you have nothing. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. Thanks for proving you have nothing.
Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -CTV Ottawa - Pit bull ban not reducing dog bites in Ont.: THS baldguy  Apr-29-10 06:15 PM   #0 
  - All the pits I've known have been sweethearts  Warpy   Apr-29-10 06:26 PM   #1 
  - No dog should be left under the supervision of any person who can't control it.  baldguy   Apr-29-10 06:35 PM   #2 
  - My pit bull and I are very good apartment dwellers!  Lucky Luciano   Apr-29-10 10:03 PM   #50 
  - But that contradicts all the media reports about pitbulls  the other one   Apr-29-10 06:52 PM   #3 
  - I expect that this ban will probably reduce the number of deaths  conservdem   Apr-30-10 12:20 PM   #113 
  - What a pair of ears on that liddle sweetie....  BrklynLiberal   Apr-29-10 07:03 PM   #4 
  - Orchids ears are a little droopy right now.  baldguy   Apr-29-10 08:54 PM   #17 
     - Awwww. I am sure you have no problem providing her with a bit of TLC for now.  BrklynLiberal   Apr-29-10 09:12 PM   #25 
  - k&r for trying to address reasons dogs bite rather than a type of dog.  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 07:07 PM   #5 
  - "Countless pit bulls and Staffordshire terriers have been euthanized because of the ban  flvegan   Apr-29-10 07:11 PM   #6 
  - Dupe  depakid   Apr-29-10 07:14 PM   #7 
  - Get back to us in another 6-7 years  depakid   Apr-29-10 07:15 PM   #8 
  - BSLs haven't worked in the UK, they haven't worked in Australia,  baldguy   Apr-29-10 08:23 PM   #11 
  - Th actual problem one can address effectively is the dangerous breeds  depakid   Apr-29-10 08:30 PM   #12 
     - Question about bans. Do you seriously believe that making it impossible for assholes  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 08:47 PM   #13 
     - Its the Pit Bulls that *create* irresponsable dog owners, don't-cha-know.  baldguy   Apr-29-10 08:57 PM   #18 
     - well golly gee, that explains my uppityness  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 08:59 PM   #21 
        - Apologist!!1!  flvegan   Apr-29-10 09:44 PM   #39 
     - Assholes will own dogs- and policy needs to address that as best it can  depakid   Apr-29-10 09:23 PM   #30 
        - You are so wrong  Texasgal   Apr-29-10 09:31 PM   #35 
        - The denialism astonishes even the cynical sometimes  depakid   Apr-29-10 09:59 PM   #47 
        - pitbulls are genetically designed to attack humans? o.m.g.  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 09:45 PM   #40 
           - "to be responsive and gentle to people."  depakid   Apr-29-10 10:00 PM   #48 
              - Indeed. That is what makes them such good search & rescue dogs  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 10:37 PM   #68 
     - BSLs don't reduce the severity of injuries caused by dog bites either.  baldguy   Apr-29-10 08:49 PM   #14 
  - This "banned the breeding, sale and ownership of pit bulls. "  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 08:53 PM   #16 
  - You'll still be wrong then. n/t  flvegan   Apr-29-10 09:23 PM   #29 
  - We shall see- as I live where such bans are thankfully in place.  depakid   Apr-29-10 09:24 PM   #31 
     - Living in a sad, knee-jerk society bound by media hype  flvegan   Apr-29-10 09:26 PM   #33 
        - Living in a safe environment with universal health care, living wages, low unemployment  depakid   Apr-29-10 09:54 PM   #43 
           - Next  flvegan   Apr-29-10 09:56 PM   #44 
              - Forget the sharks- try these guys:  depakid   Apr-29-10 10:01 PM   #49 
  - loser  Lucky Luciano   Apr-29-10 10:04 PM   #51 
  - looks like they don't distinguish a chihuahua nip from a pit bull attack.  provis99   Apr-29-10 07:27 PM   #9 
  - Why is it that every "billy wanna be bad ass" .....  doublethink   Apr-29-10 07:44 PM   #10 
  - I think you are saying every dog of a certain size should be banned?  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 08:51 PM   #15 
     - Yes you are wrong,  doublethink   Apr-29-10 09:51 PM   #42 
     - In fact tell ya what ..... lets have a contest .....  doublethink   Apr-29-10 09:57 PM   #46 
        - "150 lb pit bull?" LOL at the ignorance.  flvegan   Apr-29-10 10:04 PM   #52 
        - Ya know the ignorance is in 'getting the point' ....  doublethink   Apr-29-10 10:17 PM   #56 
        - Really?  flvegan   Apr-29-10 10:20 PM   #59 
        - .........  doublethink   Apr-29-10 10:21 PM   #62 
           - Thanks for proving you have nothing.  flvegan   Apr-29-10 10:22 PM   #64 
        - You edited your post to take out your "inaccuracy"? I won't call you stupid.  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 10:39 PM   #70 
           - Why is it so hard for you people to get the point ?  doublethink   Apr-29-10 10:45 PM   #75 
              - Bigger dogs can cause more damage. Gotcha  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 10:48 PM   #78 
                 - BINGO !! I SAID THAT !!  doublethink   Apr-29-10 10:58 PM   #80 
                    - Here is a problem, people buy into that "150 lb pit bull" thing. It adds to the "OMGness"  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 11:05 PM   #84 
                       - Pit Bulls get bad press because of the idiots that DO train them to fight......  doublethink   Apr-30-10 12:48 AM   #108 
        - There you happy now? But still stupid.  doublethink   Apr-29-10 10:19 PM   #57 
           - Look above you, "stupid"  flvegan   Apr-29-10 10:20 PM   #61 
              - still laughing ....  doublethink   Apr-29-10 10:21 PM   #63 
                 - Still wrong. Still look like an idiot.  flvegan   Apr-29-10 10:23 PM   #65 
                    - Take your anger issues elsewhere ..... skippy ....  doublethink   Apr-29-10 10:30 PM   #66 
                       - Your valid point that you believed pitbulls get to be 150lbs? Yup.  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 10:40 PM   #71 
                       - Okay see post #75 ..... n.t.  doublethink   Apr-29-10 10:46 PM   #76 
                       - No you didn't.  flvegan   Apr-29-10 10:41 PM   #72 
                          - Well I was close .... 142 lbs is the U.S. record .....  doublethink   Apr-30-10 01:43 AM   #109 
                             - Shows you what a knowledgable breeder can do.  baldguy   Apr-30-10 05:54 AM   #110 
                                - Here is what I said from my original post upthread #10 ....  doublethink   Apr-30-10 11:38 AM   #112 
        - Pitbulls generally weight from 40-75 lbs. SO clearly you habe bought into the media hype. nt  Lucky Luciano   Apr-29-10 10:09 PM   #54 
        - habe?  doublethink   Apr-29-10 10:20 PM   #58 
        - LOL! Never could type well. I make many off by one keystrokes!  Lucky Luciano   Apr-30-10 08:06 AM   #111 
        - So are dalmations.  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 10:46 PM   #77 
        - So you are saying that every dog of a certain size SHOULD be banned. Thanks for clarifying.  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 10:35 PM   #67 
           - My original post stands on its own ..... if you can't understand it ...  doublethink   Apr-29-10 10:38 PM   #69 
              - "do you think the damage done would have been as severe?" If it was a dog similar size, yes.  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 10:45 PM   #74 
                 - Yes I agree on that .... also .....  doublethink   Apr-29-10 11:01 PM   #81 
  - Tell me about the severity of bites.  BlooInBloo   Apr-29-10 08:57 PM   #19 
  - big dogs like st bernards bite harder than small dogs like shitzus.  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 08:58 PM   #20 
  - .  baldguy   Apr-29-10 09:07 PM   #24 
     - Cool. Now make it a 2-dimensional graph....  BlooInBloo   Apr-29-10 09:14 PM   #26 
        - Ban dalmations! All 101 of them!  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 09:18 PM   #27 
        - Uh... I just told you a good way to quantify "doggie danger"...  BlooInBloo   Apr-29-10 09:23 PM   #28 
           - I looked @ the list, did as you said. Big dogs that have more of a tendency to bite  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 09:31 PM   #34 
           - Here's a clue - why not ban *people who create dangerous dogs*?  baldguy   Apr-29-10 09:37 PM   #38 
           - maths! Must be you are a Brit!  Lucky Luciano   Apr-29-10 10:11 PM   #55 
        - IOW, Bloo's "gotcha" failed.  flvegan   Apr-29-10 09:25 PM   #32 
           - Huh? What gotcha?  BlooInBloo   Apr-29-10 09:32 PM   #36 
              - your chart that shows several other big dogs have more of a tendency to bite  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 09:47 PM   #41 
  - Good article on breed fears...  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 09:06 PM   #22 
  - 17 fatal dog attacks in 42 yrs in Ohio committed by 11 different breeds...  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 09:07 PM   #23 
  - Virtual kisses to that sweet face!  Texasgal   Apr-29-10 09:32 PM   #37 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-29-10 09:57 PM   #45 
  - The other breeds are overcompensating  Canuckistanian   Apr-29-10 10:06 PM   #53 
  - The quotes from the article following yours shed light on the data.  TexasObserver   Apr-29-10 10:20 PM   #60 
  - Why do you say "Pit Bulls inflict severe damage, more than most breeds"?  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 10:42 PM   #73 
     - Lockstep brainwashing.  flvegan   Apr-29-10 10:51 PM   #79 
     - Because it is true.  TexasObserver   Apr-29-10 11:03 PM   #82 
     - Proof of that assertion is needed. No, it isn't true. Why do you look for  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 11:06 PM   #85 
        - It's the truth you can't handle. Deal with it.  TexasObserver   Apr-29-10 11:07 PM   #86 
        - Your sig line is not proof. If you seriously think a sig line is proof, well  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 11:20 PM   #87 
        - It's a quote from a court finding supporting a legislative ban on pit bulls.  TexasObserver   Apr-29-10 11:21 PM   #88 
           - Your inability to come up with more than "it's the truth, it's a quote" from nonsourced  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 11:24 PM   #90 
              - It's a quote from the column in the OP, as I've told you already.  TexasObserver   Apr-29-10 11:27 PM   #92 
                 - No, you haven't.  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 11:42 PM   #95 
                    - Yes, I have. It's in the body of the article.  TexasObserver   Apr-29-10 11:45 PM   #99 
                       - THANK you for finally saying it is in OP. No, all you say is "it's a quote"  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 11:51 PM   # 
        - Pit Bulls don't bite more frequently, and they don't have the strongest bite.  baldguy   Apr-30-10 04:28 PM   #115 
        - Told you. n/t  flvegan   Apr-29-10 11:23 PM   #89 
           - I wish my sig line was the truth. Maybe if I start repeating "its' the trooth, its' a quote"  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 11:26 PM   #91 
              - It would be if you sourced it to a court holding, as I have.  TexasObserver   Apr-29-10 11:28 PM   #93 
              - 5 states say it is a legal civil right. Too bad the other states haven't passed the laws yet  uppityperson   Apr-30-10 12:00 AM   #107 
              - Like Fox News, one can pick and choose tidbits and repeat over and over  flvegan   Apr-29-10 11:39 PM   #94 
                 - The truth about the breed really hurts.  TexasObserver   Apr-29-10 11:43 PM   #96 
                 - Prove it.  flvegan   Apr-29-10 11:45 PM   #98 
                 - I have. Judicial finding affirming legislative finding.  TexasObserver   Apr-29-10 11:47 PM   #101 
                    - No you haven't.  flvegan   Apr-29-10 11:51 PM   #102 
                    - Yes, I have. It's not important to persuade pit bull zealots.  TexasObserver   Apr-29-10 11:54 PM   #104 
                       - It's the truth! clap clap clap clap clap  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 11:56 PM   #105 
                       - So then...you've really got nothing.  flvegan   Apr-29-10 11:57 PM   #106 
                       - Since I can't say what I really want to say...  ceile   Apr-30-10 04:37 PM   #117 
                    - Not proof. Show me the proof, the evidence that that opinion was based on.  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 11:53 PM   #103 
                 - clap clap clap clap clap I believe!!!  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 11:46 PM   #100 
                 - I think of it more as Tinkerbelle fallacy, aka "the big lie".  uppityperson   Apr-29-10 11:45 PM   #97 
     - dupe  TexasObserver   Apr-29-10 11:04 PM   #83 
  - I love my pit. unfixed and wouldn't hurt a fly.  fishbulb703   Apr-30-10 12:24 PM   #114 
  - I was walking Orchid the other day when a huge male GSD came charging out of his yard toward her.  baldguy   Apr-30-10 04:34 PM   #116 
  - I'm sorry,  TEXASYANKEE   Apr-30-10 04:53 PM   #118 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC